similar to: Newby using IntelR1304BB Need help with installing 6.4

I don't see a menu option from the KDE window or a name in the install software.. Norm

hi. i'm hitting a wall each time i try to format a 3 terabyte partition. i'm able to create the partition using parted but whenever i try to create a 3 terabyte xfs or jfs or ext3 filesystem, the mounted filesystem created is only 1 terabyte. i tried centos x86 and x86_64 4.0 but i always hit a 1 terabyte limit. please help.

Hello, I have an Lacie NAS disk attached to an Gigabit network. Since it only exports samba I mounted on one of my gigabit Linux boxes with smbmount //lacie/terabyte /TERABYTE -o defaults,username=genuser,password=genuser Now I need to export that to all my linux boxes not on the Gigabit network using nfs. When I try to mount I get: mount: old:/TERABYTE failed, reason given

I have a quad core server in which I want to run 4 virtual servers. On this server I have a 1/2 terabyte raid 1 I have split between the 4 members that have the OS on it. I have raid 5 10 terabyte internal storage running on a 3ware 9690a card. I want to share this storage between the servers without partitioning it. Is this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work: bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc00000ac) Could not check secret Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this. I can get log files, but

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/16/2015 09:11 AM, Callum Scott wrote: >> It is running a little >> tight on memory and so there have been a couple of events where the >> OOM_killer has been invoked and killed off MySQL, which you would >> expect. > > One thing that should be noted is that regardless of swappiness, > overcommit might be an issue. If a single

Has anyone experienced a significant degradation in ext3 performance when using it on a Multi-TeraByte RAID? As part of an experimental setup, I hooked up three 300GB drives and made an EXT3 RAID5 out of them, using the entire space one each drive, and started throwing a large number of files in the size-range 3KB to 50 KB. Then, I deleted the raid, and created a new one, but this time, I used

Hey FLAC gang - Just thought you'd like to know CD Baby has switched to FLAC for archiving the 40,000 CDs we have in stock. Luckily HD space is down below $1/gig so we got a 6-terabyte RAID-5 box set up for about $7000. Got the FreeBSD boxes churning away night and day, ripping and archiving. I'll do a more formal press release for ya in a couple months as we're further along, but

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range? (And yes, we do actually run a 70 TB at the moment, so I'm not asking just to annoy you; I'm genuinely

Hi, folks, This is a test post; to make it of interest, here's an issue you might want to be aware of, those with not brand new hardware. We've got a few Dell PE R415s. A 2TB b/u drive on one was getting full, so I went to replace it with a 3TB drive (a WD Red, not that it matters.) We got the system in '11. I built the drive - a GPT, 1 3TB partition, on an R320, from '12.

On 8/17/2016 7:46 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > There's no option in BIOS to disable the RAID mode; this is NEC servers !! huh. i've never seen anyone using the lsi megaraid firmware with intel SATA ports, so thats two things weird about NEC, kinda glad I don't ever see those. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

I have just purchased an HP ProLiant HP ML110 G5 server and install ed CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on it. It has the following spec: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3065 @ 2.33GHz 4GB ECC memory 4 x 250GB SATA hard disks running at 1.5GB/s Onboard RAID controller is enabled but at the moment I have used mdadm to configure the array. RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation 82801 SATA RAID Controller For a simple

Greetings, I'm seeing some weird issues surrounding the 2 terabyte limit on my 3ware (9590SE, PCI Express model) raid controller. Currently, the raid array is 6 x 500GB disks for a total of around 2.3 terabytes formatted. Looking at the documentation on the 3ware site, the raid card can handle a single partition over 2TB, but it still looks like fdisk fails to create a primary partition over

I'm curious to what people are using for backing up their samba servers. Here's are some specs to consider: - 1TB (yes, that's terabyte) of data - multiple servers backup to one tape drive connected to a server (preferably a linux system) - using an autoloader (in this case, an HP 1/9 LTO system) - need to be able to backup daily changes and/or changes since last full backup

On 11/16/2020 01:23 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: >> I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the >> motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS upgrade of >> the system, I lost the RAID 1 setup and was no longer able to boot >> the system. > The Intel RST RAID (aka Intel Matrix RAID) is

I ran into a problem that I couldn't resolve straight away, but would like to solve for sometime in the future. We have a Thecus storage server (similar to a Buffalo TeraByte, if that helps?) that has a Mac filesystem on it. The mother board was failing, but the drives are still OK. A new box has been added, so the urgency is sort of gone. I was going to try and back up the data to a new

I'm considering using rsync in our data center but I'm worried about whether it will scale to the numbers and sizes we deal with. We would be moving up to a terabyte in a typical sync, consisting of about a million files. Our data mover machines are RedHat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 and all the sources and destinations are NFS mounts. The data is stored on big NFS file servers. The

I'm looking to replace my (old, creaky) netbook (Acer Aspire One D255e, a screaming dual core 1.6 GHz Atom, and a whole 2 gigs of RAM) with something faster but not too large. Sometimes (usually) the netbook is painfully slow. Something like a hi-res 14 (or 15) inch screen (full HD), minimum of 4 gigs RAM, HD of a half terabyte or bigger. I'd like to not have to go over 600-700 dollars,

I performed a test install of CentOS Beta 5 on a system with two ~60 GB drives. When installing CentOS 4 on this system, I normally work thru setting up Software RAID with identically sized partitions on each drive. For my test, the CentOS installer only presented a single drive. I took the default of letting it do what it wanted. After looking over the system I have verified that /boot is

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:04:54AM -0800, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > > > NAS offers safe concurent access (generally, there might be > > some NAS devices outthere that do not). NAS device will > > manage file system internally, and export it over NFS or > > SMB protocols to the clients. > > Such NAS' are a combined host+storage aka