similar to: ruby on rails on ARM am335x

On 2013-10-18 7:11 AM, Sebastian Reimers wrote: > Hello!, > > i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch > on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON > floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. > > At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower > in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could

Hi, Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been seeing an increase in the CPU time. In version 1.0.x, complexity 5-10 are the exactly the same for music.

I wrote: > In a floating point build > it's enabled only at complexity setting 10 Sorry. I meant that in a _fixed_point_ build the new analysis code is enabled only at complexity setting 10. It's currently enabled for floating point builds at complexity 7 or higher. Both fixed and float builds default to complexity 9 in 1.1. -r

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that > increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you > appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and > up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been >

Hello!, i've just compared the 1.0.3 release with the master branch on a BeagleBone Black (AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 with NEON floating-point accelerator) and Arch Linux ARM. At the moment I dont no why, but I see that 1.1 is much slower in encoding. Are there any default changes, that I missed and could explain this? Normaly I suggested a better performance with 1.1 and the ARM

Hi, I have purchased a VPS that has WHM cpanel. I have logged into the root of my system using putty and installed ruby 1.9.3 via rvm and rails 3.2.9. I have created a website in cpanel that has created a public_html directory that is live and working on the web. I then created a simple ruby website called blog in the public_html directory. My question is how do I get the ruby application to run

Hello, you can compile opus with "--enable-fixed-point". That saves a cpu ressources. https://github.com/Studio -Link/PKGBUILDs_clean/blob/master/opus/PKGBUILD#L23 -- nice regards, Sebastian Reimers ------------------------------------------ IT-Service Sebastian Reimers Am blanken Boom 14 32369 Rahden Festnetz: 05776-3930000 Fax-Nummer: 05221-17242088 Skype: miete-admin E-Mail:

Hello, has anyone running a linphone-application on am335x (like beaglebone) with opus codec. My CPU has extreme high load, wenn ist start with opus codec. Is there a possibikity tu optimize f?r this single core ARM? Thanks Helmut Sholz ______________________________ BAYERISCHER RUNDFUNK Rundfunkplatz 1 80335 M?nchen HA IT und Medientechnik Abteilung Systemservice Funkhaus FG Sendungssysteme

Hello, I am trying to cross compile LLVM. Build and compile on Mac OS X 10.5.7 Target is an Angstrom Linux Cortex-A8 Beagle board. I would like to avoid GPLv3. I can compile. But when I run my executable on Beagle crt0.S is calling an AngelSWI to setup the heap and stack. But the AngelSWI seems to just be a stub because it returns zeros for the pointers. That leads to a segfault. If I hack in

On Jul 2, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Neel Nagar wrote: > I suspect that my llvm-gcc cross compiler is using the wrong > assembler because it does not recognize "-mcpu=cortex-a8". This is a known problem. We've only added support for ARMv7 (including cortex-a8) in llvm in the last week or so, and the associated changes for llvm-gcc are still pending. Unless you need specific

I suspect that my llvm-gcc cross compiler is using the wrong assembler because it does not recognize "-mcpu=cortex-a8". I was trying to build a cross compiler for a Mac host. Now I am trying to build on x86_64 Linux. I am targeting a Beagle board with an ARM Cortex-A8 and Angstrom Linux. TRIED: to use the script in llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/build-install-linux.sh I used the recommended

On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. Sorry this reply wasn't as quick. > On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT) markhor <markhor at ispras.ru> wrote: > > Hello. > > I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM > "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. I got this email 9 times at a difference of a few minutes, did you send it that many times, or something wrong with the mailing list? Best regards, --Edwin

Hi Charles, Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> > wrote: > >> First issue: whatever I set as the offdelay, seems to be ignored and >> the UPS just cuts the power about 2sec after receiving

Now that I have HLVM up and running on x86 and x64 I am interested in testing it out on an ARM in preparation for their imminent world domination. I believe LLVM already has excellent support for the ARM thanks to Apple's ARM-based products. However, I'd really like an ARM-based consumer device suitable for developing and testing HLVM on, rather than using a cross compiler and

I'm needing a way to full text index a bunch of pdfs so that I can search them from a web front end. Beagle would be ideal. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending upon your viewpoint), mono, and mono apps, will likely never see the light of day in RHEL. I'm looking for the most straightforward way to get beagle installed. I don't need the gnome gui, just beaglelib, beagled, and

Hi, there was a message in the list at Fri 26 Oct 2007 21:13:58, that beagle was added to centos testing repo. But I could not find it there. Please could someone give me an advice. Thank's a lot! "We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the CentOS-5 testing repo for both x86_64 and i386." Are there any experiences with beagle under centos 5? Is it usable now

Hi Folks Can anyone help me with the following error - is it serious; is the file transferred; are the other files transferred? [morgan@morgansmachine ~]$ rsync -a -X -A -z -v /home/morgan/Documents 192.168.1.30:/home/morgan/Documents morgan@192.168.1.30's password: building file list ... done rsync: rsync_xal_set:

Hi Renato, > > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > > their software but for packaging purposes. > > > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > > Dragonegg. > > > > Hi Folks,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > Now that I have HLVM up and running on x86 and x64 I am interested in > testing > it out on an ARM in preparation for their imminent world domination. I > believe LLVM already has excellent support for the ARM thanks to Apple's > ARM-based products. However, I'd really like an ARM-based