similar to: gcc 4.x on centOS 5

hello to all, i am a newbie to CentOS. for my project work i need to have RHEL. so i searched Google for Open alternatives and found CentOS to be most popular. i have used Fedora, the base of RHEL and CentOS. Fedora is the one of the most buggy *NIX distro i have ever seen. since Fedora is the base of RHEL which is the base of CentOS, i just want to know whether CentOS is stable and reliable

Hi All In my project I am to take date of birth from user so I used datetime_select. It renders three selection boxes, year, month and day. But I want order as day, month and year. I added :order option for datetime_select, it renders normal selection boxes with order year, month and day. Why :order does not work with datetime_select? see my following code <%= datetime_select(:user2,

Hi all, Hope this isn't off-topic, but I thought the lists might be interested in a video interview I did with Eben Moglen, the head of the Software Freedom Law Center. Eben has given legal advice and help for Samba for many years, and is a very interesting person to listen to. Hope people find this enjoyable: http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/07/geek-time-with-eben-moglen.html

There is some pine rpm for release 4? Im too used to it and I dont like mutt. -- Roger D. Vargas http://dsgp.blogspot.com | Linux, programaci?n, juegos ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, m?s seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue. FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have LLVM 3.9 and GCC 4.9. NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM 3.8. Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that it also has LLVM 3.8. Going back to what Joerg said earlier. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=netbsd says NetBSD 7 ships with GCC 5.3, but Joerg said 4.8. Which is it? And even

For anyone still on gcc 4.2.1, then I think this entire discussion is kind of irrelevant, because they are already having to build a new toolchain to compile LLVM, since the minimum is currently 4.7. So for those people, I would imagine 4.7 vs. 4.9 makes no difference? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the table of the distrowatch page, but if FreeBSD 11 has clang 3.8 as you say, why does

I know this may be a stupid place to ask, but I have to ask. I'm looking for a new Linux distro to use and support. I've been a loyal purchaser of SuSE Linux Pro for the last 3 years. I've paid my $90 loyally, in part because I wanted money to actually go to someone working on OSS, but also because I thought it was a good bargain, to get a quality, tested distro for that cost. The

I see a lot of people talking about c++14 and *maybe* clang-N.N.N will support it, but is there any tests which can be used to actually/tangibly verify this? Is there tests for the features being proposed to take advantage of? It would be prudent to ensure there's tests available to verify on buildbots before any decision to switch is made. Break this into steps and it becomes a plan instead

Oh it's "documented" - great.. well that doesn't give any weight to if it works and how robust. Is there tests for these features or not? I know if I wanted to add or change *anything* a test would be required. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > It's documented here > > http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html >

Hi Friends, Could anybody suggest me some nice and useful plugins for RadRails! It would be very great if we make list of all such plugins! 1)________ 2)________ 3)________ 4)________ 5)________ 6)________ 7)..... Please fill above blanks and lets make a big list of it! -- Don''t live to geek; geek to live. http://anilw.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hello list. I've just read this news (http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=02638) - in my opinion very good idea. What do you think? Regards.

Hello, I'm searching for a test that applies to a dataset (N=36) with a continuous zero-inflated dependent variable and only one nominal grouping variable with 2 levels (balanced). In fact there are 4 response variables of this kind which I plan to test seperately - the amount of zeroes ranges from 75 to 97%.. I searched the web and found several modelling approaches but have the feeling

I read on the wiki page "BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End" that the bind version supported by the Samba version 4.5.2 is Bind 9.11? Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS repo offers Bind9.10.3 and Debian Jessie is Bind9.9.5. Currently running Samba 4.5.0 (from source) on Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS. Does this suggestion mean I am limited to Samba version 4.5.1 until Ubuntu upgrades the bind9 version? I have been

Hi, Emilis, I have two working Icecast players which implement client-side parsing of yp.xml and searching then through it: - Python, can either transform the yp.xml into SQLite database and then search inside, or can store the yp.xml locally and transfer in into DOM, then search it. http://www.zavedil.com/software-xbmc-icecast - Java (Android), same algorithm as Python but only the SQLite

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:04:15AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:09:08PM +0000, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: > > The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue. FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have LLVM > > 3.9 and GCC 4.9. NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM 3.8. > > Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that

Hi all, i want to virtualize an existing Centos 5.x machine (intel xeon, 64 bit OS, Qlogic HBA) into a vmware 3.X VM that will not be connected to the SAN (hence no need for the HBA drivers). So i googled a while and found this link: http://virtualaleph.blogspot.com/2007/05/virtualize-linux-server-with-vmware.html However the link is quite old and I wonder if anyone here has done such conversion

Hi Thomas, On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:43:28AM +0200, Thomas B. Ruecker wrote: > Do players support https? obviously not. But the implementation of SSL in a player isn't that hard. In a matter of fact, SSL isn't the best solution for a public stream, but I want to use it for a private stream, where every user has the knowledge how to use a player with ssl. :-) > You could simply set

I have a fairly simply laid out network that could easily use static routing. However, I plan to expand quickly and don''t wish to spend the better part of my life maintaining static routes. INTERNET | --------- Gateway | - LAN 172.16.1.x | - LINK 192.168.1.1 --------- |<----wifi --------- router 2 | -LAN 172.16.2.x | -Link 192.168.1.2 ---------

Thanks for your help Dale, I got a little bit more clue (in snipped the begining the build messages) : ar cru /Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a /Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/lib/System/Debug/Alarm.o /Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/lib/System/Debug/Disassembler.o

Has anyone experienced the conversion of the aluminum chassis Mac G5 to a Linux box? Curious in Pennsylvania. I need to obtain the power cable somewhere to try it. It is a 64-bit monster, so seems like it is worth trying if I can find the weird cable it needs. No luck to date regarding the cable. Thanks. The Bears will never win until number six leaves.