similar to: Where are we going?

After several weeks of discussion the leaders of Compiz and Beryl have agreed that the two communities shall reunite. This decision is supported by both David and Quinn and represents the majority decision of the administrators and developers in each community. At this early stage not a lot has been decided, but these are the main points of the agreement: - As had previously been decided,

On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 20:11 -0400, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: > Hi David, > > If you've been following the discussion on the forum and/or compizadmin list, > you can see that we aren't getting anywhere with these discussions. The > hangup seems to be selecting a new name for the Compiz-Extra division. The > Beryl people feel it's the only thing they're asking for

This was a private mail and not supposed to go to the compiz list. Please don't don't read it unless you're on the compiz admin list. :) I've apologized to Jeff, Mike, Rico and Arturo for making this mistake and I'd like to apologize to anyone else who might have been offended by it. I guess the good part is that you get an uncensored view of what we feel about the community

Hey All, First off, congratulations to David and the others who worked on the 0.3.4 release and Happy Thanksgiving! There's been some discussion in the forum on the design and functionality of the compiz website and I'd like to get the opinion of David and any others who have an interest in this topic. My first question is to David. You indicated that you were interested in having

Our previous attempts to select a project name for CompComm have not gone well. We tried a poll but the names in the poll were not pre-qualified to determine if they were usable and the ?winning? name was also a strongly disliked name. Kristian and I each proposed a plan to select a name, but that effort got sidetracked by a massive flame war on the mailing list. While our community has some

I'd like to get all of you updated on the compiz related things discussed at the X developer conference that was held last week. The slides I used for my talk are available from here: http://people.freedesktop.org/~davidr/xdevconf07/ and you can also find some notes from all talks here: http://wiki.x.org/wiki/XDC2007Notes My talk was mainly focused on "what's next" and how

Hi Everyone, I'm going to make some big structural cleanups to core which is likely to affect everyone here, but I believe is for the better, so I am posting this mail now to get some feedback and make sure that we don't tread on anyone's toes when I merge all of this stuff. 1st Change: Decorators are going in their own repo ========================================= The decorators

Hello, I'm new to compiz and to this list but I'd like to contribute. I couldn't find a more appropriate place to ask a few questions about the compiz project (which is actually my first question). 1. Since the apparent compiz/beryl fork I don't see a compiz "community" site. Is there one? 2. Is compiz going to continue to be developed, and if so, is there a road

Compiz 0.9.0 is released! This is the first unstable release of the Compiz 0.9 series. This release represents a complete rewrite of the 0.8 series from C to C++, brings a whole new developer API, splits rendering into plugins, switches the buildsystem from automake to cmake and brings minor functionality improvements. This release represents the first developer and tester preview of what will

Danny, Kristian, All, First let me tell you guys whatever you are doing with compiz, keep it up! It's looking great! I have a new error on ArchLinux when running compiz 0.8.2.1 that I have never seen before. I installed Archlinux on 2 boxes to check it out. One on a x86_64 box with the nvidia driver (no problems there) and one on an i686 box with onboard intel video. When connecting over

Compiz 0.9.2 is released! This is the second unstable release of the Compiz 0.9 series. This release represents an evolution of the 0.9 development series and brings a few minor new features and plenty of stability, speed and bugfixes. It should be ready for general usage. The Compiz 0.9.2 tarballs are available at http://releases.compiz.org/0.9.2/ . You can verify these tarballs using the

Hi Since a few days compiz fails to start on my system. It bails out with the message: compiz: No GLXFBConfig for default depth, this isn't going to work. compiz: Failed to manage screen: 0 compiz: No manageable screens found on display :0.0 I'm using Ubuntu Edgy with the beta nvidia drivers and a recent git checkout of compiz. I read somewhere, that this error could be related to mesa

Hello, when I start a second X server or when I suspend (and resume) to ram compiz crashes. I tryed to debug this but its impossible to run gdb on compiz (=freeze). This happens with current git, but If I remember correctly not with 0.3.6 (and git versions < 0.5.0 but I don't know when it started to happen). any ideas?

Resending as kwin and plasma mailinglists think that 200k is too large for a mail. The "attachment" can be found in [2] Hi, Pleas note: crossposting to kwin, compiz and plasma development lists. Please keep all lists CCed. Attached you can find a very first draft for a compositing manager specification. It is currently based upon the KWin/Plasma interaction specified in the

Hello All, A quick update regarding the domain name issue. Ben and I have been in contact with Guillaume and things are moving forward. Guillaume has installed a re-direct page on compiz.com that provides links to both compiz.biz and beryl-project.org. He has also agreed to give David the compiz.org domain name. David, could you contact either Guillaume or myself with your registry

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:14:51PM +0000, Wes James wrote: > > > On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Wes James <comptekki at me.com> wrote: > > I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I?ve been testing 7.1, but I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info for this or is it not supported yet? > ? > > I installed the kde option for centos

Instead of use compiz windows manager, I want to use matchbox, but I want reuse compiz plugins, means I use matchbox + compiz as windows manager + 3D desktop effect solution, would you please give me some suggestion about my plan. What about the effort? Would you please give me some suggestion. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: David Reveman [mailto:davidr at novell.com] Sent:

I forgot to give everyone an update on this. The blur plugin is in a reasonable state now. It requires an OpenGL implementation with an accelerated CopyTexSubImage2D path for usable performance and that's likely not going to change sometime soon. One major performance improvement can still be made, which allow us to avoid the CopyTexSubImage2D path whenever the area behind a blurred region is

Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? Recently Quinns post to the beryl-dev mailing list entitled 'Merge on' has led to a lot of discussion, some of which has been good and some of which has led to a lot of misinformation, to clear things up I'd like to give the story of the merge, and the justification for some of the more peculiar aspects. Basically lets try to avoid

On Jul 17, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:14:51PM +0000, Wes James wrote: On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Wes James <comptekki at me.com> wrote: I have compiz installed on centos 6.6, and I?ve been testing 7.1, but I can't find any info on installing compiz on 7.1. Is there any info for this or is it not