similar to: [gem] Rails Exception Handler released

I''m interested in knowing whether a session is created by pages requested by web crawlers and bots. I am using MySQL as a the session store and would like to prevent requests by web crawlers and bots from creating unnecessary session entries. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:59:24AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:57PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > + /* > > + * Mark the per-cpu GHCBs as in-use to detect nested #VC exceptions. > > + * There is no need for it to be atomic, because nothing is written to > > + * the GHCB between the read and the write of ghcb_active. So it is safe >

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 01:48:31PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 09:59:24AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:57PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * Mark the per-cpu GHCBs as in-use to detect nested #VC exceptions. > > > + * There is no need for it to be atomic, because nothing is written to

Portable OpenCL (pocl) v0.6 released ------------------------------------ Portable OpenCL aims to be an efficient open source (MIT-licensed) implementation of the OpenCL 1.2 standard. In addition to producing an easily portable open source OpenCL implementation, another major goal of the project is improving performance portability of OpenCL programs with compiler optimizations, reducing the

My understanding was that using the :post=>true on a link_to() was supposed to prevent search engine crawlers from triggering the link. However, this does not seem to be working for me. Is there something else that I should be/can be doing to accomplish this? Thanks. -Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> TBAA on loads and stores is super useful for conveying high-level type

Regarding Wei's patch that modifies the shrinker implementation, versus this patch which reverts to OOM notifier: I am in favor of both patches. But I do want to make sure a fix gets back ported to 4.19 where the performance regression was first introduced. My concern with reverting to the OOM notifier is, as mst@ put it (in the other thread): "when linux hits OOM all kind of error paths

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:57PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > index a4fa7f351bf2..bc3a58427028 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include <linux/sched/debug.h> /* For show_regs() */ > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > #include

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:57PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > index a4fa7f351bf2..bc3a58427028 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include <linux/sched/debug.h> /* For show_regs() */ > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > #include

On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > TBAA on loads and stores is super useful for conveying high-level type knowledge to LLVM transformations. But often translating a high-level language into LLVM IR will result in runtime calls

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > indexing the llvm.org svn archive. This means that when you search for > an > > LLVM-related symbol in code search, you get one of the many (possibly > > out-of-date) mirrors, rather than the up-to-date llvm.org version. This > is > > sad. > This is intentional. The

Hi All, I''m running: WinXP-Pro/SP3 Rails 2.3.5 MySQL 5.0.37-community-nt I ran rake db:create:all and got something like: LibMySQL.dll required. I had a worse symptom previously when, on an earlier post on a related failure, Sharagoz kindly suggested I drop back to a 5.0 version of MySQL. As I prepared this post, I wanted to recall my version. In particular, I wanted to run select *

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> Add the handler for #VC exceptions invoked at runtime. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 4 + arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 7 ++ arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 167

I've uploaded Xapian 1.0.7, which as usual you can download from: http://xapian.org/download This release fixes an assortment of bugs, and improves efficiency in a few cases. It's intended to be a relatively safe incremental update over 1.0.6. For a more detailed overview see: http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/ReleaseOverview/1.0.7 The full lists of user-visible changes are linked to from

On 16 January 2018 at 12:23, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > Do we have to emit directives in the epilogue, too? One of my test case fail > due to the directives in the epilogue have been executed. After removing > them from epilogue, the exception is caught as expected. Emitting directives in the epilogue is hard because the directives apply to all instructions

In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.970503190235.5733A-100000@puck.nether.net>, Myles Uyema <linux-security@redhat.com> wrote: > [mod: But from reading the source I think you don''t need a /dev entry > to remount the partition without the nodev. Moreover you could MAKE > the /dev entry and use that if it were necessary. But that is not the > issue. The issue is that a

One of the tools I use most frequently when coding is Google codesearch. Unfortunately, llvm.org's robots.txt appears to block all crawlers from indexing the llvm.org svn archive. This means that when you search for an LLVM-related symbol in code search, you get one of the many (possibly out-of-date) mirrors, rather than the up-to-date llvm.org version. This is sad. For more info, see the

Hi When I make a call from the outside to asterisk and the call is asnwered, all is OK, but when I make a call from the outside to asterisk and hangup before the call is answered, you got this WARNING in the console: Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521 ast_read: Exception flag set on 'UniCall/2-1', but no exception handler Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521

Just did a few searches, trying to find a redhat or centos 6.x livecd iso, preferably an i686... but no joy. Maybe google's web crawlers haven't found the page yet. Anybody here know where to find it? tia, ken

Hi John, > If you run into problems, please email llvmdev. I'll periodically check > llvm.org to make sure it's still up. I'm seeing long delays on llvm.org again. Pages are served eventually, but it takes minutes for each requests. Are there any dynamic scripts on the server that can eat a lot of resources? I think the nightly tester result pages would qualify? Perhaps