similar to: subclasses with inherited_resources?

I wanted to do: foo.wrap and wrap would go to a specialized wrap for some types of foo and a general Object#wrap for all the others. So I added wrap to Object class Object def wrap self end end This worked except for objects which are actually AssociationProxy objects pretending to be some other object. The reason is that AssociationProxy removes all but a few methods from itself.

I''m upgrading to the latest version of ActiveAdmin and am running into the following when trying to start the app: Expected ../app/model/store/base.rb to define Base base.rb defines base like: module MyApp class Store::Base end end I''ve done some digging and found that ActiveAdmin did some refactoring to derive everything from a BaseController. It also depends on

I had code class_inheritable_accessor :attrs, :instance_reader => false, :instance_writer => false self.attrs = {} now i want to get rid of class_inheritable_accessor, but class_attribute only supports instance_writer, not instance_reader options and i really don''t want instance reader. Is there any way to do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

I have: module MySpike extend ActiveSupport::Concern included do class_attribute :foobar, instance_writer: true end end But, I want to be able to override the class attribute writer and/or instance writer method to do something when the attribute is set via self.foobar = true before or after calling super to set the attribute. Unfortunately, I can''t find a clean way

I''m having a terrible time trying to test a nested route with rSpec. I can''t seem to tell rSpec to expect the call @item.user. The following error message plagues me not matter how I try to fuss with the mock: Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''ItemsController handling POST / items should redirect to the new course on successful save'' Mock

I''ve just stumbled (literally, while I was trying to fix a glitch I was having after upgrading Aegis...) on the Inherited Resources gem... why did no-one tell me?! ;-) Is everyone else using some form of controller base-class? Am I the last on this bus! https://github.com/josevalim/inherited_resources -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Hi everyone, I''m working on creating a site that functions similar to digg.com (please no "no more digg clones" remarks please! :) ). One thing I really like about digg is there URLs are very nice to read and I would like to emulate that without having a lot of actions spread out all over my application. So in my app I have three main resources: Users, Tags, and Items

I can''t understand why authenticate_or_request_with_http_basic keeps failing even though I am entering the correct info. If I try to access /admin/items/new, I enter the correct info but I keep getting prompted. The strange part is that when I cancel out, I get "HTTP Basic: Acce". Here''s the controllers: class Admin::BaseController < ApplicationController

Hey :) I''m trying to create a method for making a sitemap dynamically. It works great for flat sites where you simply have your controllers in the app/controllers directory. In this case, I can extract the controller names like, @controllers ObjectSpace.subclasses_of(ActionController::Base).each do |obj| @controllers["#{obj.controller_name}"] = obj end However,

Hi, I ran in trouble with unexpected rollbacks using cucumber 0.3.0. My feature-file looks like Scenario: Create Valid Item Given I start and the step is Given /^I start$/ do get "/items" end In my log/test.log I get SQL (0.2ms) SET NAMES ''utf8'' SQL (0.2ms) SET SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL=0 SQL (0.1ms) BEGIN Processing ItemsController#index

Hi I run into problem trying to set expectations for the mockobject.class method, I had to undefine a method before I could set some expectation. Is there any better way of doing it? object = mock() .... klass = class <<object; self; end klass.send(:undef_method, "class") # I had to do this because Mocha utilizes "method_missing(symbol, *arguments, &block) "

How do you go about implementing and rspecing subdomains as account keys? I''m sure that this must be an issues for others as well. So I have an app using subdomains as account keys. The Application Controller sets up @current_company in a before filter. Everything is done within the context of the @current_company. After reading about Demeter''s Revenge

There is a bug in jruby that causes thread locks around things like accesses to class attributes created with class_attribute. The notifications system is affected by this, and it''s blowing up our app. We need to disable all instrumentation and notifications for the time being. Anyone know how to do that cleanly? CHris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

On my current project I needed to create a stub that responded correctly to the id message. Here''s the change I put into my copy of head. Index: lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb =================================================================== --- lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (revision 1114) +++ lib/mocha/mock_methods.rb (working copy) @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ method_names =

I''m trying to setup some fragment caching which works fine for the index but i''m not sure how to ignore the caching if they are searching the index results. my code in short: ItemsController def index @items = Item.search(params[:search], params[:min_rank], params[:max_rank], params[:classification_id], ...) end index.html.erb <% cache (''items'',

ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-mswin32] latest version of edge rails - patched to make the server work with win32 (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4139) On some pages WEBrick is crashing with the following: d:/programming/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/profiler.rb:27: You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! (NoMethodError) You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occured

Was going to have a variety of request params sent in and use a class_attribute that would define types of request parameters that are allowed. strong_parameters wouldn''t be too much trouble in such a case if it would allow me to manually permit some attributes (dynamically determined) in the controller but allow strong_parameters to enforce security of others. Is this something

I''m trying to get a select box of categories to appear in my items views after I created everything using generate scaffold, but I can''t get the categories to appear in my forms. class ItemsController < ApplicationController def new @item = Item.new @category = Category.find_all end ... class Item < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :category end class

Hey guys, i am facing some problems in calling an action. see details: in sale_items controller, i have a function def saleedit --code-- render ( :action => ''saleedit'') end and i have a file in view/sale_items/saleedit.html.erb. okay. now i have one more view view/sale_items/new.html.erb. in this file i have a form like this: <% form_tag url_for(:action =>

I''ve always wanted to be able to do stuff like this in my functional tests c = customers(:customer_1) c.expects(:great_customer_service) post :service_customer, :id => c.id This of course fails because inside the rails action a different instance of customer is used. Some of the time setting your expectation/stubbing on Customer.any_instance works, but it''s not