similar to: USB failure (was: Networking issue (after latest 5.1 update?))

I just tried this with CentOS 5.3 as well, and got exactly the same symptoms and dmesg output. (As a point of comparison, Ubunu 8.04 on my work laptop is able to access the drive.) Obviously "not detected" is a misapprehension, though I'm puzzled why "lsusb" doesn't show it. The device is there even though the partition table can't be read. ---------- Forwarded

On Jan 11, 2008 11:51 AM, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer at gmail.com> wrote: > It appears that any given process is consistent about which timezone > it uses, but there's no obvious reason why any particular process gets > the local zone vs. UTC. For example, we have a couple of long-running > daemons that fork children to handle network requests, and although > the

Be curious myself as to what info you come up with on the "upgrade via ISO" and "SATA" support questions you posed. Hopefully someone on the list will help you out with a reply to the list. JT > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 19:47:15 -0800 (PST) > From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer at zanshin.com> > To: centos at caosity.org > Subject: [Centos] Upgrade

I've searched but can't find an answer as to how many MGCP paths can a single ADIT/CMG card support? It appears it's only 24 ports, maybe 48. What I'd like to do is install 6 Telco T1's into a single (or more) Adit 600 and route inbound calls towards asterisk. Can I have more than one CMG in a single chassis? Or maybe you know of a better way to connect T1's to

I'm using version 1.2 and need a method to detect the number of channels in use from inside the dial plan. I'd like to count total channels system-wide, but even better if I can determine for a selected extension also. I've searched the wiki, and don't see such a function that does this. Any ideas? Bart -- Barton Fisher Innovative Communications 714-228-5400 Ext 5410

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > DMARC. Hi, Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. Regards Phil -- Google+: https://goo.gl/CPjvNo Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/ GitLab:

On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: >> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been >> kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's >> DMARC. > > Hi, > > Your not the only one. I got it a few hours ago. > > Regards > >

I got file conflicts between the sysreport and sos packages on the file /usr/sbin/sysreport. I unchecked sysreport in the package updater UI and the rest of the update is proceedng.

I'm not *entirely* sure but this began happening at about the time I installed the latest kernel updates for CentOS 5.1 (kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.i686.rpm from January 24). Shortly before that I changed the encryption on my wireless router and switched from ndiswrapper back to the standard bcm43xx driver, but I'm pretty sure the network was OK before that update for the simple reason that

I have 4 TDM T1's going in to a IVR system. The IVR messages are recorded .wav format - The system appears to crap out at about 40 calls - Would using GSM or some other format help save CPU cycles? Using 1.2, Dual Xeon and 2GB ram TIA -- Barton Fisher Innovative Communications 714-228-5400 Ext 5410 http://www.icpage.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

On 9/28/06, Ingo Schaefer <ingo@ingo-schaefer.de> wrote: > Hallo, > > I installed nut 2.0.4 on a Solaris 8 and tried two things: > > First I wanted the ups to connect via usb, but I could not compile the > usb drivers. Make usb told me: no target named usb found Do you have libusb installed? (I was not aware that there was a port of libusb for versions of Solaris before

I've got CentOS 5 installed on my hp pavilion ze 5300 laptop and the network configuration UI says my wireless NIC has been correctly identified and assigned what appears to be the right Broadcom device driver on eth1. However, the inteface doesn't come up. Google doesn't find anything recent about using Linux with Broadcom except for someone's passing remark that Ubuntu 7 beta

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:12:36 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > Is this just a configuration issue (in which case, what do I change?) Your certificate is apparently valid for longer than 39 months. Running your error message "NET::ERR_CERT_VALIDITY_TOO_LONG" through google returns pages and pages of information explaining this issue. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~

> Date: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 21:25:50 +0100 > From: Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com> > > On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: >>> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of >>> having been kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail >>>

On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 21:25 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 11/09/2016 09:21 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:16 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > >> For what it's worth, I just received the auto-notification of having been > >> kicked off the list for excessive bounces. So gmail is honoring Yahoo's > >> DMARC. > > > > Hi,

I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*] However, when FX1.5 crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead. Fired up yum and I'm told I have to install a slew of evolution28 library packages in order to install the firefox package. Why? I removed evolution from my system for a reason, and I'd just as

Like many others on this list, I had been experiencing periodic lockups with my Grandstream products (Handytone 286 ATA & BudgeTone 101). The lockups consisted of seemingly dead devices, no dialtone or response, until I power cycled via software or hardware. The workaround had been to reboot the device every 30 minutes with a cron job. I contacted Grandstream and although they didn't

Apologies if I should ask this elsewhere, google search is not helping. I've got a CentOS5 server with lighttpd installed from EPEL, configured for https only (no connections on ports other than 443). I have the latest security updates for openssl, etc. However, when connecting to the server with recent Chrome from Windows or Android, I get the "Your connection is not private"

------Original Message------ From: centos-request at centos.org Sender: centos-bounces at centos.org To: centos at centos.org ReplyTo: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 71, Issue 28 Sent: Dec 28, 2010 12:00 PM Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or,

If it wouldn't be too much trouble ... when a kernel security update notice is posted to the announcements list, would it be possible to indicate whether the centosplus kernel is also susceptible to the security issue being patched? I'm running the plus kernel now, and find myself wondering whether I will ever need to back off to the base kernel because of security issues. Or is it