similar to: noob questinon: is dev in rails underwindows a good idea

Sorry for the off-topic question but I need advice on a buying a ISCSI SAN for 4-6 servers running CentOS 4.4 .The main purpose for the SAN is to store email accounts (that will be accessed by imap - dovecot) and other documents. Minimal redundancy is required (e.g. dual power supplies, battery backed write cache or mirrored controllers) and price for a 2 TB configuration should be under $ 10000.

Hello, I had talked earlier with 'Timothy B. Terriberry' <tterribe at xiph.org>, about adding support for AVX instructions in Opus, but since he appears to be busy I would like to resend this on the mailing list. I've created a pull request https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/5 to add the testing infrastructure for the changes before adding the actual code. A draft for the rest

Hello there, Can anyone help me with a problem i have.... I have an ethernet LAN, made over dumb fast-ethernet switches (10/100mbit) without management, so there is no IP for the switches. What I want, if possible, is to find out if a switch is down or not. It''s like with routers... if you want to find out if a router is OK, either you send ICMP directly to the router, or to a host

Hi all, I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :) I also posted this on Linux-HA lists with no responses so I posted it here. I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2.

Hello, I'm currently looking to see if Opus could benefit from AVX/AVX2 instructions and I've made some experiments optimizing xcorr_kernel_* function in celt using AVX2 intrinsics and got about 1.5x-1.6x speedup over SSE floating point version in pitch_sse.c. Have AVX optimizations been tried in Opus? Is there someone I could talk to about optimizing compute intensive tasks in Opus using

Hello there, Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ? I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple bandwidth limmiting, and it works. I''ve read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but couldn''t make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for ingress policing ...

Hello, I've created a pull request[1] to enable configuration to search for AVX support and set OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_AVX accordingly. Please review. Thanks, Radu [1] https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/3 -----Original Message----- From: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Timothy B. Terriberry Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:29 AM To: opus at xiph.org

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:04:04PM +0100, Radu Rendec wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at the code in virtnet_set_link_ksettings, it seems the speed > and duplex can be set to any valid value. The driver will "remember" > them and report them back in virtnet_get_link_ksettings. > > However, the supported link modes (link_modes.supported in struct >

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:04:04PM +0100, Radu Rendec wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at the code in virtnet_set_link_ksettings, it seems the speed > and duplex can be set to any valid value. The driver will "remember" > them and report them back in virtnet_get_link_ksettings. > > However, the supported link modes (link_modes.supported in struct >

Hello everyone! We are working on writing a paper about testing the reliability of C compilers by using Csmith (a random C99 program generator). A previous testing effort, using Csmith, found 202 LLVM bugs, which represented 2% of all reported bugs at that time (PDF: https://www.flux.utah.edu/download?uid=114 <https://www.flux.utah.edu/download?uid=114>): . However, after this paper was

Hello, I've integrated the tests and AVX pitch code into my fork: https://github.com/rvelea/opus/commits/master I ran test_opus_decode and it seems to be running OK. I'll do some more measurements with VTUNE and the new pitch test in the following days and get back to you with a pull request and the data. In the meantime if you have time to give it a quick look and maybe point out any

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 18:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:04:04PM +0100, Radu Rendec wrote: > > Looking at the code in virtnet_set_link_ksettings, it seems the speed > > and duplex can be set to any valid value. The driver will "remember" > > them and report them back in virtnet_get_link_ksettings. > > > > However, the

I'm going to need to build a few Asterisk boxes that have dual and quad T1 interfaces. I knew Digium made T1 interface cards and on this list I heard about Sangoma so I did a quick search and found the hardware page at voip-info.org which lists several manufactures I didn't know about. All that leads to this question: I'll be using T1s in the USA. What experiences have you all had

Sorry. I missed that. Good observation. Please go ahead and correct the patch. Thanks, Radu -----Original Message----- From: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Timothy B. Terriberry Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 11:08 AM To: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] AVX Optimizations Velea, Radu wrote: > Yes, > > Thank you. I'll follow up with

Hello I am trying to use pam to authenticate dovecot again a mysql database. In /etc/pam.d/dovecot i have: auth optional pam_mysql.so host=localhost db=maildb user=mailro \ passwd=xxx table=users usercolumn=address passwdcolumn=passwd \ where="disabled is NULL and deleted = ''" crypt=1 account required pam_mysql.so host=localhost db=maildb

Thanks, Vedant. Yes, we have done a lot of testing of Clang/LLVM (and GCC) in the past several years (more details at https://people.inf.ethz.ch/suz/emi/index.html): [GCC/LLVM bugs: *1,602* (total) / *1,007* (fixed)] [Reports: GCC (link1 <http://tinyurl.com/ojzdt78>, link2 <http://tinyurl.com/oxlkmjc>, link3 <http://tinyurl.com/jd3jnl3>, link4

On 2017?09?01? 01:04, Radu Rendec wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at the code in virtnet_set_link_ksettings, it seems the speed > and duplex can be set to any valid value. The driver will "remember" > them and report them back in virtnet_get_link_ksettings. > > However, the supported link modes (link_modes.supported in struct > ethtool_link_ksettings) is always 0,

On 2017?09?01? 01:04, Radu Rendec wrote: > Hello, > > Looking at the code in virtnet_set_link_ksettings, it seems the speed > and duplex can be set to any valid value. The driver will "remember" > them and report them back in virtnet_get_link_ksettings. > > However, the supported link modes (link_modes.supported in struct > ethtool_link_ksettings) is always 0,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72943 Priority: medium Bug ID: 72943 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: NV98 [GeForce 9300 gs m] hangs on boot- all linux kernel versions > 3.2 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS:

Hi, I have a 20GB partition on a hard disk that just developed bad blocks. Fortunately, I had backups for the most important data on it, but I'd like to recover some files that were too large to backup. When running 'e2fsck /dev/hdc3', I get the following message: e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... e2fsck: Invalid argument while checking