similar to: RFC: conflict_warnings plugin

I know that Rails 3 ideal of unobtrusive javascript will result in the removal of all inline javascript. But where does that leave RJS? It looks like PrototypeGenerator is still a part of the Rails core, so I''m going to assume that RJS templates will remain unchanged. Still looks like gems/plugins such JRals will be necessary for use of other JS frameworks. Can anyone confirm or deny

Since each ACQUIRE_LOCK/RELEASE_LOCK call must balance, this code is difficult to debug. Enable DEBUG_LOCK to add some prints which can help. The only definitive list of public APIs is found indirectly in the generator (in generator/c.ml : globals). --- generator/c.ml | 18 ++++++++++++++ src/errors.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- src/events.c

Hi, On Saturday 06 June 2015 14:20:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Since each ACQUIRE_LOCK/RELEASE_LOCK call must balance, this code is > difficult to debug. Enable DEBUG_LOCK to add some prints which can > help. There's some way this could be simplified: > const char * > guestfs_last_error (guestfs_h *g) > { > - return g->last_error; > + const char *r; >

dear redhat, i examined a friend's system today, to help him configure it. assuming that he just "installed" from scratch the samba package, it appears that you have provided a default smb.conf file for redhat 6.1 that puts samba private configuration files in /etc. the suggested options, for example show "smbpasswd file = /etc/smbpasswd". this is REALLY bad. 1) you

I've looked in a lot of places but found nothing. I'm trying to perform an rsync between 2 RH 7.2 boxes with kernel 2.4.14. My rsync version is 2.4.6 protocol version 24 Here is the command I'm passing: /usr/bin/rsync -a -vv -C --progress --delete -e ssh /tmp remote.host.com:/tmp Everytime I run this command with one of the users, I get this error: "building file list ...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9562 Summary: Systemd socket activation Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at emery.neomailbox.net

We permit the following constructs in libguestfs code: if (guestfs_some_call (g) == -1) { fprintf (stderr, "failed: error is %s\n", guestfs_last_error (g)); } and: guestfs_push_error_handler (g, NULL, NULL); guestfs_some_call (g); guestfs_pop_error_handler (g); Neither of these would be safe if we allowed the handle to be used from threads concurrently, since the error

I appologize in advance if this is a "stupid user problem" but here goes. I have a RH 6.1 machine with PAM 0.75. I installed OpenSSL and OpenSSH (2.9p1). ssh works fine however when I try to run sshd and then ssh into this same machine I get Failed Password for user x. I copied the RH sshd.pam file into /etc/pam.d/sshd. I even deleted the user and readded it. He can log onto the

Getting the following panic on a new Dell Poweredge 1650. This machine is going to be a VPN server and has a large number of pptp links configured. The machine is stable if mpd is not running. (kgdb) where #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc0229a0f in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc0229e4d in panic (fmt=0xc042876c "%s") at

On 19 April 2013 17:48, Török Edwin <edwin at etorok.net> wrote: > Otherwise what might seem like a 20% improvement > could very well be just a 0.2% improvement in practice. > This is (maybe to a lesser extent) what happens with most of our benchmarks, and running them 3 times doesn't add that much confidence but makes it run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as

On 04/15/2013 11:01 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Török Edwin <edwin+ml-debian at etorok.net> wrote: >> On 04/03/2013 01:20 AM, Renato Golin wrote: >>> Hi Torok, >>> >>> I've used a hard-coded list on the input parameter and still got some output (slightly) scrambled between two different bots... >>> >>>

I'm just starting with rsync(). I grabbed the 3.0.7 source and built it on Mac OS X.6.5 (./configure and ./make reported no problems.) When I try running with -X or -A, I get the following error messages: rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0) rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0) A quick look at the buglist didn't reveal anything to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 Summary: adjust Linux out-of-memory killer to stop sshd being killed Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=34176 7 OS/Version: Linux

Previous discussion here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/thread.html#00048 v2: - Use a cleanup handler to release the lock. - Rebase to upstream. Note I have not fixed the problem(s) with error handling (patch 3).

This patch isn't ready to go upstream. In fact, I think we might do a quick 1.30 release soon, and save this patch, and also the extensive changes proposed for the test suite[1], to after 1.30. Currently it is not safe to use the same handle from multiple threads, unless you implement your own mutexes. See: http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#multiple-handles-and-multiple-threads These

This is probably another area where a bit of dynamic behavior could help. When we find a regressions, kick off some runs to bisect back to where it manifests. This is what we would be doing manually anyway. We could just search back with the set of regressing benchmarks, meaning the whole suite does not have to be run (unless it is a global regression). There are situations where we see commit

Some more crashes of 4.8-RELEASE. Lets see what do I have today: # ls -l /var/crash total 1576676 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jul 30 13:31 bounds -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jun 25 17:30 kernel.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 4 00:08 kernel.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 15 19:28 kernel.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 16 17:50 kernel.3

New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0) Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare: c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0 I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool. As a test, I have pulled disk

Hi all, I've searched the depths of the resources on the internet; however I'm having trouble deploying a pxeboot solution via pxelinux. So far what I have successfully implemented in my infrastructure is a successful pxeboot setup for FreeBSD ( without the use of pxelinux ). I'd ultimately like to have a solution that will allow me to choose a network install of various Unix-like

Hi all, I have the following in my extensions.conf: exten => s,4,GotoIf($["${CALLERID(number)}" = "8585979857" | "8585970327"]?15:5) The numbers listed above are known spammer numbers. However, when I call from any other CALLERID, it still directs me to s,15 which is the Hangup() application. Here are logs from the asterisk CLI: -- Executing