similar to: Wonder shaper wierdness.

I have a linux server connecto into a 100mps LAN, i use iptables implementation of shorewall (shorewall.net) and then I used the wondershaper. When I adjusted the values below, I got a download speed for vsftp at a whooping 1187.91 KB/s but a upload speed is only a painful 27 KB/s. I dont fully understand the underpinng codes behind the wondershaper htb stuff. can someone guide me on how can i

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi there, what''s difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ please advice. regards, /vicky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBfuS9pbZvCIJx1bcRAl27AKCldJljOgC89SPKAmPMM4Vwitc3IACdFS3s

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

I am just starting on the list! I have a little question: I tried Wonder Shaper and i love it! The uploads no more mess with my downloads. Now i really can get all of my ADSL! But, i run wondershaper manually everytime when system reboots: ./wshaper I use RH8 and here dont have a /etc/ppp/ip-up.d to put the configuration file, like README say to me to do. Somone know where i need to put it? Or

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As stated by your message, I''ll try it again on the mailing list.. I tried your wondershaper today and there is one thing I am puzzling about. If I add port 80 and 21 like this NOPRIOPORTSRC=''80 21'' The uploads from my webserver and ftp server are a lot faster then without adding the ports and surfing the web is a pain. If

Hi, i don''t know if anyone can help me. I Have and Linux RedHat 9.0 machine, where i have installed the wondershaper script to limit my inbound internet speed. And on the Linux it works fine, but then i have an Windows machine that uses the linux machine to get to the internet. And this on this machine the script does not seam to have any impact. I''m trying to limit my upload

Hello everyone. I''ve been trying to get Qos to work here for two days now, but it REALLY doesn''t seem to work the way I want to. Here is my situation: Internet Wireless LAN Firewall DMZ Local lan As you can see, I got a Debian box in the middle as my firewall with 3 network interfaces and a wireless one. I use

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what

Greetings, I am trying to set up Wonder Shaper to work along with Shorewall 2.0.8. I have read through this document here: http://shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm and set the necessary options in shorewall.conf, and I coped the contents of the htb file to tcstart and changed things in accordance with the readme. Now from what im seeing, that''s all there is to it and it should work,

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Thanks for the tips Brian, Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the ethernet interface and cable modems. To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a saw some messages talking about that. One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''s assume there is no

Hey, I was fiddling with wonder shaper and it works great, except in my situation I only have 1 real network interface and the other interface is a virtual interface ie eth0:0, and tc doesn''t seem to support that. I have 2 subnets, one of which goes to the router which then goes to the internet, and the other subnet which contains the rest of the computers which go through this server

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hi al.. I just write program that helps to configure tc with HTB and iptables CLASS extension. Its written in perl and uses Apache like config files. Program can be found on http://sourceforge.net/projects/ist-shaper/ or http://www.ingwar.eu.org/ist-shaper/ In few days will be new version with time aware rules. The simply config file looks like this.

Hi! I have configured traffic shaping with htb and imq but when i am downloading the latency for example on the Bnet class is very high ..... example: 65 kb/s download best latency: 56ms lateny on bnet class while downloading: 400 350 250 350 400 100 300 200 80 200 300 250 ..... To get informations about latency i am marking ping packets with iptables. I want to play during other users

Hello guys, I am experiencing a strange behaviour with HTB. Here is my situation: Test PC -------- internet ------------- ISP ----- fiber connection --------- (eht2) RT1 (eth1) --------- wireless connection ------------ (eth4) RT2 (eth0) -------- users RT1 - Slackware router RT2 - Slackware router Delay between Test PC and ISP is approx 450 ms. I have the following shapers

Hi, first of all, let me thank you for your great Shoreline Firewall. I use it with great success at home (protecting my WiFi connection). And now if I could have a question about traffic shaping. I did read everything I could find but I still have two problems: first, the MARK from tcrules is not working in HTB based simple tc filter line ("handle $MARK fw classid 1:20"). If I switch