similar to: (E)SFQ HRR (=Hierarchical Round Robin)

lartc-request,hello! 　　 I find a line in tbf_change() in sch_tbf.c: ptab = xchg(&q->P_tab, ptab); Can I consider that the pointers are exchanged between q->P_tab and ptab? as following: prev=q->R_tab; q->R_tab = rtab; rtab = prev; Is my understanding righ? ======= 2002-03-23 12:01:00 you wrote:======= >Send LARTC mailing list

added to http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ FAQ section. ------------------------------- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I''m forwarding copy of the message to lartc group too as it may be of general interest. Regarding your case I''ll try to summarize our conversation. You asked me for explanation of an error message. I answered and asked for basic informations. You followed with msg that there is no other info. I directed you where to find it and reasked basic config info again. Other mails

Witold Szczerba spent his time evaluating fairness of borrowing. His troubles inspired me enough to analyze the problem: When a class changes from yellow to green it disconnects itself from parent''s feedlist. Unfortunately it resets feed pointer to the first child. I created a patch where the class uses classid to remember its position in the feedlist. The patch for 2.4.24 and hopefully

I just wanted to inform that there is new patch donated by Walter Karshat which implements packet overhead and MPU computations to the rate table. See diff for details on arguments. No tc binary available yet at I have to compile it on system with older glibc (not everyone use 2.3.2). ------------------------------- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer

Hello all, Two oopses were found by zhaoyao and Daniel Blueman. Patch against 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here. It will be included in next kernel releases of course. ------------------------------- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] "weight" parameter in htb? Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:54:01 +0530 From: Shekhar Joshi <shekhar@disha.co.in> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl On Tuesday 02 April 2002 07:32 pm, you wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:34:08PM +0200, Martin Devera wrote: > > > E.g. you might have a customer agency which needs say 256

Can I use the same SFQ queue dicipline for all the classe in a CBQ or HBT system?

Martin Devera wrote: > If you read the manual, the algorithm will not work correctly > with {,c}burst < MTU ... > devik > I just tried to change {,c}burst to 1600, or leaving them by default but no visible result. here is the latest tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:101 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 40Kbit ceil 40Kbit burst 1599b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1599b/8 mpu 0b quantum 512 level

Hello, First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing my problems here now... I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

libswfdec/swfdec_html_parser.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.c | 2 + libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 9 ++---- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie_as.c | 3 ++ libswfdec/swfdec_xml.c | 5 +++ test/trace/xml-escape-5.swf |binary test/trace/xml-escape-6.swf |binary test/trace/xml-escape-6.swf.trace

I have this problem: I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a min speed: Vmax and Vmin. The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the actual bandwidth (you don''t not how much, you only know the speed is between Vmax and Vmin) for N clients. The bandwidth should be shared so nobody can get more bandwidth than the others.

Hi, for interested in participation on finishing new HTB developement I created simple docs regarding it. It is some insight into CBQ and HTB workings and problems. See luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/

Might be of interest for some of you, especially: o HTB - detailed look into new QoS shaper - Martin Devera o Linux Packet Classification Performance - Jamal Hadi Salim o Status of IPv6 Implementations - Peter Bieringer o High Availability using Keepalived - Alexandre Cassen o Application Layer Fingerprinting - Hendrik Scholz

Hi people, What are the pros and cons of Winbind, LDAP and Kerberos in a Samba 3.0.2 plus Active Directory environment ? What could be the best design for this scenario ? Estevam Henrique ========================================================= Esta mensagem pode conter informacao confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se voce nao for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber

Thanks: To Stef and Tobias Geiger for giving me the answer. I used the prio to get the order right. Don't know why I did'nt think of it myself. Compression: Another thing that might be useful to the list is the use of compression (Deflate etc.) to get better bandwidth across links. This requires a Linux router at both ends of the link. I got the idea from a product called Peribit see

You should use the ntlm_auth module provided by samba. -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de Riccardo Baldanzi Enviada em: quinta-feira, 22 de abril de 2004 16:51 Para: samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: [Samba] Problems with ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp Hi Guys,

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2