similar to: Egress shaping over multiple interfaces?

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Yesterday I started using CBQ in production on our firewall over an IMQ device, but since then I get a lot of messages in my syslog like below: On Wednesday 13 November 2002 09:07, root@ism.nl wrote: > Nov 13 08:01:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. > Nov 13 08:12:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. > Nov 13 08:18:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages

Hi Guys, Here is a question that is probably of concern to many of us. I am under pressure to provide some solution for ingress traffic shaping. What my customer demands is to divide the downstream (ingress) of an ADSL lines to two classes of traffic - important traffic and non important downloads. He has a very reasonable requirement: he wants a guarantee of at least 1000kbps at all times for

Hi I''m completely stuck with the tcng language - I assume there must be some way to arrange queues hierachically like eth1 | TBF | PRIO / \ class class but my attempt (below) produces a "inferno.tc:8: qdisc "tbf" has no classes near "prio"" when run through tcc. dev eth1 { egress { tbf (rate 128kbps, burst 64kb,

Hello all, My company is sharing it''s internet access with a neighbor and the neighbor in question was eating our bandwidth (both in upload and download) most of the time. I finally set up a linux router to limit the incoming/outgoing bandwidth to his network by adding a tbf on eth0 interface and eth1 interface of the router (neighbor is behind eth1 and we are in-between him and the

Hi, I can''t get traffic shaping working. This is my situation: -------- ------ Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2 -------- leased line ------ eth1 eth0 We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

Objective: All web traffic originating from my proxy server should be forwarded through interface eth2 instead of the default eth0. The reply should take the same path back to the proxy server. Problem: On the return bout, the kernel doesn''t pass the packet to the higher layers. The reply seems to be getting tossed away between PREROUTING and INPUT Netfilter chains.

I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps. Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed. What about the ingress policer would do

Okay here is my setup: Gentoo Box running 2.6.4 w/ 4 NICs 1 NIC is for internal network 3 NICs are for external network The machine has a static address assigned to the internal network nic. This nic runs dhcp and dns forwarding. The other 3 nics have external dynamic IP addresses. All will have the same gateway. There are 3 NICs because this is a very large pipe, that will only allocate a

Hello All Its first time i posting to this mail list :). I have done something (maybe) important. I write new IMQ device driver based from Martin Devera and Patrick McHardy implementation with device EOS support. My current implementation supporting only egress trafic shaping and kernel 2.4.25. For more details, source and examples have look at my page http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos Ill

Hi ! I have a single host which is connected via an 512kbit ADSL link to the n= et. I quite often use some realaudio application that uses some bandwidth = and I want to avoid other traffic to scale that bandwidth down. So I used = some classes (with htb) on imq0 device and applied some filters and it see= ms to work in most cases. However, there are some sites with which downloa= d is

Hi, I would like to know how to specify the token rate when a tbf qdic is created using tc tool.. Will it be a default value when tbf qdisc is created? This could be a silly question.... im quite new to all these stuff.. but im really interested.. any help will be most appreciated... thanks in advance, sanjeev -- ______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS

Hi, I''ve a router configuration with a dsl connection and two ethernet NICs. How can I control the traffic of the dsl connection when then destination of the traffic can go out of the router using two diferent interfaces? ppp -- router --- lan | DMZ I''ve read that the solution could be IMQ, but i prefer to not to patch kernel and iptables. Any

Hi, I have more ethernet cards. Egress shaping with HTB over eth0 works fine, ingress shaping with HTB over IMQ works also fine, but in both of cases I use only one class of traffic. Now I want to divide traffic to 3 classes on other interface (egress to ineternal network). I try this command sequense tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid

Hi all, It is my understanding that with HTB, the rate and the ceiling are divided over the elements of the class. E.g. using a rate of 100 kb and a ceiling of 2000 kb for a class with 10 elements on a 100Mb NIC, the effect of the ceiling will be that if all elements are generating their maximimum possible trafic they will be effectively limited to ~ ceiling / number of elements, in this case

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

Hello ppl, I''m playing with the pfifo scheduler, its simple, and i cannot understand what''s wrong. So, i have test machine, with one interface eth0, and i want to send no more than 3 packets/sec out of that interface, so i do: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root pfifo limit 3 And i get pfifo scheduler on eth0 with limit of 3, but it sends as many packets per second as it wants, without

Dear All, Sorry to trouble again..... After go through www.lartc.org I have implemented the HTB instead of CBQ for the same scenario. Now following files are under /etc/sysconfig/htb directory. eth0 DEFAULT=30 R2Q=10 eth0-2.root RATE=256kbps BURST=25k eth0-2:10.comp1 RATE=120kbps BURST=12k PRIO=0 LEAF=sfq RULE=192.168.200.0/24 eth0-2:20.comp2

Hi there, I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate 1Mbit/s! My setup: I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the