similar to: [iptables] LOG & DROP simultaneously ?

I have looked through the archives, and I can''t find the answer(not that it isn''t there) I have two connections to the net. I want load balancing and redundancy. cable adsl (24.141.) (64.229) | | | | | | | | ------------ | linux | |redhat 7.0| I have no idea were to even start. I would like equal access to both connections.

Hi, can anyone help me with this problem i''ve got! I have a problem with routing on my Mandrake 7.2 Linux Box i was wondering if you could help me with. I live in Australia and as broadband access isn''t very available at the moment, i have 2 modems to dialup to my isp (dynamic ips assigned) to increase my bandwidth at an affordable level. What currently happens is i have a

Hi. I''ve got here the following configuration: (turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more accurately way) Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT [if doesn''t really

Isn''t it possible with iptables to filter on DSCP field? Thanks, Tom Aernoudt

& If can HOW ? thx

Hello All, I have two Internet link and two LAN networks I have Redhat-7.1 linux-2.4.17 kernel and 2 NICs In eth0 172.16.1.1 and eth0:1 192.168.1.1 in eth1 are public ips of isps as eth1 a.b.c.d and eth1:0 w.x..y.z I want do source routing using ip rule command. echo 200 isp1 >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from 172.16.1.0/24 table isp1 ip rule ls 0: from all lookup local

Hi, I have a linux box connected to two leased lines as follows: _/\__/\_ / \ +--------+ +------------+ ( Internet )----+ Router | | SMTP server| \_ __ _/ +----+---+ +------+-----+ \/ \/ | 200.200.200.254 | 100.100.100.2\ -+-------+----- ... ---------+-- 100.100.100.1\ | 200.200.200.1 +-+--+--+ | Linux | +---+---+ _/\__/\_ 192.168.1.1 |

Hello, lately I've been playing with the idea of doing in-place updates of systems using either rsync or xdelta. However, both rsync and xdelta seem to be dead set on writing a new file first, and then atomically exchanging it with the old file. Now, as I want to apply a binary delta to a full filesystem, bigger than the available temporary space, this really makes rsync and xdelta

I have the following forced up mew by evil telco problem: - One IP - Homebrew LAN - portforwarding for some services. - extra PPTP/ppp layer to an internal 10.* network which mutilates DNS answers. Setup: Machine A has ip a.b.c.d (real IP) and is reachable over ADSL with it from the world. It does NAT for an internal LAN 192.168.0.0/24) and has portforwading turned on for some ports (eg 80)

hi, anyone to know a tool that will display more friendly output ... probably a tree like structure (if no cross sections occur)... OR a top like output... thanx raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody, I'd like to save/restore some partitions on my harddrive via rsync. (They happen to contain other os'es, so I can't safely mount the partitions read/write). So, I'd like to do something like rsync /dev/hda1 server::images/part_1.image -c -z -B65536 -S but: - "skipping non-regular file part_1" is misleading. Not the destination is not a file, the

hi, does someone tried bridge and or router functionality of linux kernel on multiprocessor system. Does multiprocessor system increase network performance or give ability to process higher traffic.. What about highest possible troughput someone have achieved ? etc.. tia _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi, i have a strange situtation. i try to connect to my machine with ssh and the packets are dropped but i have at the top of my rules an accept. the configuration looks like: rules-file: ----------- ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 - TCPDUMP-log: ------------ 12:16:08.153934 84.153.98.30.1322 > [my-destination-machine].ssh: S 3717288415:3717288415(0) win 64240 <mss

Anyone to know iproute-save, iproute-restore like script similar iptables-save/restore ? that stores everytihng routes,rules,tables everything ... then init.d-script that among other things stores the state on shutdown :") (thats easy then) ----- http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-12-08-004-32-OS-BZ-DT-0005 snip> MS Office is popular in the same way as heart disease is the

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

I have searched your FAQ''s and read the documentation on your site as well as googling. I am not able to figure this out. If you have any ideas can you please help. I am using the linux-ha failover with redundant firewalls. As part of the function of the linux-ha software consists a service called heartbeat which is a connection from each failover node through a serial cable or ethernet.

Dear R guru's, I'd like to sort the columns of a matrix according to the elements in the first row, and in case of a tie according to the second row, etc. In case of a 3xn matrix woppa, something like colorder _ order(woppa[1,], woppa[2,], woppa[3,]) I just cannot seem to find a way to do this for a variable number of rows, e.g. if woppa has 10 or 15 rows I now manually cut and paste to

Hello: I just started using Shorewall this morning and must say that I''m very impressed. Much nicer than what I was using previously. I love the ability to type ''shorewall logdrop ww.xx.yy.zz'' and completely block a particular IP address. However, the log part doesn''t happen. When I look in the logdrop chain, there is no LOG prefix. I''ve looked

hi I would like to ask is the following config correct for what I want to achieve ... Scenario: I have 3 networks 192.168.12.0/24, 192.168.48.0/24, 192.168.56.0/24 and most of the users use 1 IP, some of them more... If I make flat u32-filter search the box will make aprox/max 3 * 256 = 768 checks for every IP, so i''m deciding to deploy u32 hashes.. Here is the config I think to use