similar to: Request to grant me Wiki edit rights

Could someone please replace the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories with the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for the purposes of the article, please let me know.

KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a

Hello, Discussion point and request for edits (either through an existing approved editor, or via myself if I am granted access) Hopefully a constructive suggestion to improve documentation, and elsewhere in the Wiki it advises me to raise such things through this mailing list. I recently noticed in Freenode/#centos somebody seeking help and being redirected to

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39

Hello, I created a wiki username JoshuaFranklin and would like to contribute a description of http://iuscommunity.org/ to this page: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories IUS is a new third party repo for RHEL that provides the "latest upstream versions of PHP, Python, MySQL". It is sponsored by internal work at Rackspace (but officially unsupported). Thanks, Joshua

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >

Hello, My name is Rizky Ariestiyansyah here is my detail on the wiki usernamer : ph03nix FirstnameLastname : Rizky Ariestiyansyah Please allow me to contribute edit the wiki and l10n also I can help create event in Indonesia. Thank you -- Rizky Ariestiyansyah Founder of Evone Firefox OS Developer Volunteer ID-CERT, Mozilla, IlmuBerbagi, XFCE, Fedora. Blog : http://oonlab.com/ Phone : +62

Hi, I want to update some wiki pages such as http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge for help to developt Centos project. Can any one help to the permissions. Best Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20141023/ef8f7a0a/attachment-0004.html>

Dear CentOS Doc, We are planning to organize CentOS Dojo at Bangalore, India - http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Bangalore2014 - in the month of Nov. I request you to grant `edit` permission to update my homepage - http://wiki.centos.org/DominicGeevarghese - for further followup with speakers/presenters. Thanks in advance. Cheers, -- Dominic Geevarghese 2C7C 2AFC B327 6D12 FB55 29D8 046D A4F6

Howdy, It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is incomplete. The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000 http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b I could dive in an make the changes *I* think need to happen but I'd like to talk to people

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it

hi guys, we've got more and more people who need edit rights to this page, at https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline - is it worth doing a ContainerEngGroup and make that group own this page instead of adding usernames to the page itself ? Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

I would like to be given sufficient access to http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to validate my changes. I have yet to work with the RPM Package Manager, so I will be making edits that need to be reviewed

On 14/01/15 23:51, Trevor Hemsley wrote: > Now as far as the term "Community Approved" goes: I think it's fairly > accurate and I'm not sure what the objection to it was. We have to have > a way to say "These repos are ok" and "these suck" and "these suck worse > than that". The way the page reads at the moment seems to me to strike a

Greetings, I tried to install FASTTRACK repos today from this link: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and the links were broken e.g. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo fyi, Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com

I see this diff: Subject: centos wiki] u/d AdditionalResources/Repositories /RPMForge by AlanBartlett The following page has been changed by AlanBartlett: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge?action=diff&rev2=31&rev1=30 The comment on the change is: No questions should be asked of any author within any article. Please use "Info" to

... which will hopefully be the last part. Sorry that it took that long, but I didn't have too much time on my hands over the last two months or so. This is what should be the last stages of opening up the wiki: a) I have changed the account creation page: <http://wiki-m.centos.org/UserPreferences>. Please view that page while logged out of wiki-m. b) While doing so I have

SerNet has en pages on their site: http://www.SerNet.de/en/samba/ Since I am maintaining the base (en) page page of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories shouldn't the en SerNet home page be the reference in the SerNet paragraph? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Good morning. Might I please have edit access to the AdditionalResources/Repositories page on the wiki? Account name is JohnDennison. Thanks! John -- Humans hate to admit error even as they stand there, black and smoldering, with the stub of a cigarette in one hand, in the middle of a wide crater containing them and the remains of a sign that once read "DANGER: VOLATILE

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent >> repositories safely usable and give a