Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "specialness of ''local'' table.."
2010 Jul 20
1
imap core dumping on signal 10
We are just trying to bring up a new server and chose to use Dovecot
rather than the uw-imap from our previous servers. At this point I am
just testing with some throw away accounts using squirrelmail. I can
load my inbox, but then the imap connection is lost. I presume you need
some real information to get your teeth into, so this is going to get a
little long. I'll give you three things
2008 Nov 28
2
Panic in 1.1.6 file ioloop.c: line 206
Hi all,
I just had a panic with dovecot 1.1.6, two days after replacing 1.0.15
with it in production.
Here are the logs immediately preceding the panic, I think they're
related. It seems the user connected simultaneously from two different
clients, from his own computer and a webmail running on the server, then
manipulated mail folders on one side, and logged out. The panic occurred
3
2011 Sep 06
2
error in logs, but system appears to work
I'm bringing up a system with dovecot that has been running for years with uw-imap. In making the
switch, I put a tail on the log file, made the switch, and sent a test mail and received it. I was
able to receive mail with no apparent difficulties, but the log file was disconcerting. A number of
users connected during the few minutes I had it running, and for each of them there was an
2007 Jul 20
1
Sharing AD domain info with 2 SBS2003 servers
When I took over as the IT guy in September, there were 2 separate
locations with different domains each managed by a SBS 2003 machine.
The connection between them was an OpenVPN tunnel. The network was
fine and one could see 2 domains in the network.
Local and Local2 are working names. From a workstation on Local one
could see Local2 in the Microsoft Windows Network, and vice versa from
Local2
2011 Jun 10
0
3.0.7: assert in change_local_filter_dir failed
I'm seeing the following assert:
rsync --archive --devices --specials --sparse --one-file-system --verbose --whole-file --numeric-ids --delete-before --hard-links --delete-excluded --exclude-from=/share/alliance-bind-local2/rsync.exclude.all --include-from=/share/alliance-bind-local2/rsync.include.all --include-from=/share/alliance-bind-local2/rsync.include.drive_a '--include=*/'
2009 Mar 31
5
[Bug 1581] New: Pb with syslog
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1581
Summary: Pb with syslog
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.2p1
Platform: Sparc
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: eric.savidan at
2007 Nov 13
6
Facter and arrays
Hi,
Is it possible to have an array as the output of a custom fact? And
then to pass it into a template in Puppet?
I currently have a fact that looks like this:
Facter.add("exports") do
setcode do
case Facter.hostname
when (/thishost/i):
[ "/local", "/local2" ]
end
end
end
& a template like this:
<%
2004 Dec 03
3
Smtp redirect
Hi list,
I have the following problem:
my boss and some other people on my lan want to use their ISP smtp to
send mail when they connect from work lan, but, of course, their ISP
smtp don''t allow relay when they aren''t at home.
You can image my networks so:
eth0 internet public ip
eth1 local1 10.88.11.0/24
eth2 local2
2011 Jul 17
11
[Bug 8308] New: rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
Summary: rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir:
Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
2003 Nov 18
1
ACLs and samba
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting ACLs and samba to work on solaris. In a unix
shell I can set and get the ACLs with setfacl and getfacl just fine.
Connecting with a window machine (w2000/w2003) to samba lets me
list the ACLs and even modify them. The problem is creating new
ACLs. In the logs I get
20031029/local2.error:Oct 29 16:30:11 test1 smbd[5417]: [ID 702911 local2.error]
2003 Mar 20
1
bind blocking rsync
Hi Guys,
Here is the setup.
LVS NAT cluster with director (dir), backup director (bdir), and two
realservers (rs1 and rs2) running apache webserver.
SSH DSA key-based authentication set up between rs1 and rs2 in order to
facilitate automated (via cron) mirorring of htdocs directories. All
works fine untill I decide to host DNS on the same cluster. As soon as I
start BIND on rs1, ssh no longer
2001 Mar 20
1
Ogg for Real
Hi!
Anyone out there that has allready written an Ogg fileformat plug for
RealServers and players?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark de Bokx - Application Engineer
Cistron Internet Services
P.O. Box 297, NL-2400 AG, Alphen a/d Rijn
06-17948710
"I Refuse To Have A Battle Of Wits With An Unarmed Person."
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage:
2011 Feb 25
1
error - dovecot - child (login) killed with signal 16
We've been happily running Dovecot in Solaris 10 for about 8 months now.
Yesterday, Solaris 10's SMF put it in maintenance mode (shut it down) seemingly out of the blue. The
only thing going on was that I had updated the ssl certificate. We had previously been using a self
signed cert. Now we have a cert from InCommon. We had a problem with a few users who are still on
ancient Eudora
2008 Jan 08
8
Shorewall and LVS-NAT (via fwmark) nat'd machines can't access the outside world directly
Hi guys,
I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll
start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite
enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong
one ;)
I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS.
Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan
|
eth2
2018 Dec 18
0
High Load average on NFS Spool - v.2.1.15 & 2.2.13
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH
CHS CISA CISSP:
> I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with
> dovecot. Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I
> have been experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot
> servers.
> I am not certain why they are not well behaved. Here is the
>
2018 Dec 18
2
High Load average on NFS Spool - v.2.1.15 & 2.2.13
I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with dovecot.?
Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have been
experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot servers. I am not certain
why they are not well behaved.? Here is the configuration information.
This configuration is currently running at a load average of 17.
/usr/sbin/dovecot -n
# 2.1.15:
2018 Dec 18
0
High Load average on NFS Spool - v.2.1.15 & 2.2.13
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:26 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH
CHS CISA CISSP:
> I have, but I will be happy to review it once again.
>
>
> On 12/18/18 2:14 PM, admin wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E.
> > Whale, CEH CHS CISA CISSP:
> >
> >
2000 Oct 11
0
RE: CBQ and load balancing -> solved
Hi there,
I got the solution for my problem, and thought may at someday somebody
could use it. Julian Anastasov and some people from the LVS mailing list
helped me with it.
---
Subject: Re: LVS and CBQ
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:53:01 +0000 (GMT)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: joern maier <joern.maier@informatik.uni-ulm.de>
CC:
2006 Sep 15
1
Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
Is it possible?
For LVS you have to deal with something called the ARP problem (viz.,
the realservers should not respond to ARP requests for the hardware
address associated with the virtual IP). This is solved with some
sysctl stuff for kernel 2.2.x and for 2.4.26+, but of course CentOS 3
is 2.4.21.
There's a kernel module "noarp" that's suppoed to work for all 2.4.x
kernels
2018 Dec 18
1
High Load average on NFS Spool - v.2.1.15 & 2.2.13
dont play net cop here
but since you want to try force your opinion down others throats heres
one for you, if you want to try dictate to someone to bottom post to
suite you how about you use proper net etiquette yourself and TRIM
your posts
On 12/19/18, admin <admin at awib.it> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:26 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH
> CHS CISA CISSP:
>>