similar to: HTB code :-)

The HTB scheduler code is a mess, this patch set does some basic house cleaning. The first four should cause no code change, but the last two need more testing. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> "And in the Packet there writ down that doome" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to

Hi, for interested in participation on finishing new HTB developement I created simple docs regarding it. It is some insight into CBQ and HTB workings and problems. See luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/

Witold Szczerba spent his time evaluating fairness of borrowing. His troubles inspired me enough to analyze the problem: When a class changes from yellow to green it disconnects itself from parent''s feedlist. Unfortunately it resets feed pointer to the first child. I created a patch where the class uses classid to remember its position in the feedlist. The patch for 2.4.24 and hopefully

Hi, I''m trying to make run a simple shaping *through HTB*. I have compiled a new kernel 2.4.21. First command from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm said: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument I tryed both standard tc from Debian stable and http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v2/tc.gz this one... I tryed

Hello, I have been searching for HTB theory documentation and found two interesting sources - Devik''s page and docum.org FAQ. In some places they are contradictory which make me think that Devik''s theoretic document (marked "actual") is just too old and does not reflect the latest changes. After reading http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/30.html and others, I

I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs, even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt. To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c . This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with 256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it''s +45. For the many who have 128 up it should limit them to +90 rather than +180. Andy.

Hi, I am new to tc, please forgive me for simple question. I have linux 2.4 in my routers, I would like to use HTB. I have downloaded binary code from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/#source, (tc.gz), but I could not open the file. Is there any other place I can get binary code for HTB. Also if you can give some direction how to patch it, it will be really helpful. Thanks in advance Omer

Hi Devik/Patrik, In setting up IMQ/HTB with a GRE Tunnel I''m constantly getting kernel errors: [root@linux /root]# dmesg ... ... ... NET: XXX messages suppressed. Dead loop on virtual device gre1, fix it urgently! ... ... ... This I get only if I''m going to start cross device b/w control. If I remove iptables rule iptables -t mangle -D POSTROUTING -j IMQ then no such warning

Hi, Trying htb (latest patches from the page) with 2.4.17 I get: RTNETLINK answers: File exists iproute is 20010824 with the patch from the page. The kernel module loads, but is not used: sch_htb 12672 0 (unused) Any ideas? -j

Hi there! I''ve using HTB for a while and now I an faced with a ''problem''. How hierarchical is HTB? Let''s say I have this 3 layer HTB setup: root class 1: (rate=100, ceil=100) 1: children classes 1:10 (30,100) and 1:20 (70,100) 1:10 children classes 1:100 (10,100) and 1:101 (20,100) 1:20 children classes 1:200 (30,100) and 1:201 (70,100) I managed to have

Hello, I think the BUG_TRAP() in the htb_dequeue_tree() is wrong. First it checks if the class pointer "cl" is NULL, which is obviously right. But I do not understand why we also check whenever the queue length of the leaf queue is zero "cl->un.leaf.q->q.qlen". I would have put that in the expression of the "if" statements that comes afterwards. A queue

Hello, I''d like to try out HTB for traffic shaping. I have a test machine with Redhat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.10), I''ve downloaded kernel 2.4.17, applied the patch from http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/, recompiled the kernel (checked the option to use HTB in make menuconfig), and rebooted with the new kernel. When I try to add some rules with HTB (f.i. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hi, I''m a bit confused with the priority of different classes with HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum priority? Any help is most appreciated, Thanks in advance, Sanjeev -- ______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by

Hi, machine: AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and

Hello, I''ve been using cbq''s "weight" parameter to influence distribution of excess bandwidth among sibling classes. Does htb offer something similar? So far I think that - you either use priorities - then excess bandwidth is offered to higher priority classes first, the rest (if any) is distributed among lower priority classes - or you don''t use

I cannot get HTB to function properly. Most classes transmit more than their ceiling, more than any reasonable burst would allow. I have reviewed my script several times but I can''t find anything out of place. The setup is as standard as it gets: one HTB root qdisc, a small tree of HTB classes, one SFQ qdisc for each leaf HTB class. To illustrate the problem, here is non-leaf HTB

hi there, this is my 1st message in the list. I would like to use this wondershaper.htb to limit the bandwith usage at home. My kernel config is: # QoS and/or fair queueing # CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=y CONFIG_NET_SCH_TBF=y

Hello all, Two oopses were found by zhaoyao and Daniel Blueman. Patch against 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here. It will be included in next kernel releases of course. ------------------------------- Martin Devera aka devik Linux kernel QoS/HTB maintainer http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.