similar to: [off] voip, h323, rtp speed testing

> Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:49:49 +0200 > From: raptor <raptor@tvskat.net> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] X:Y to tcng corespondence ! > > Is there a easy way that I to get class-id<----->tcng-class-path conversation.... and vs. versa.. > > --__--__-- There are couple files can be created by tcc: # cat a.tc dev

hi, does someone tried bridge and or router functionality of linux kernel on multiprocessor system. Does multiprocessor system increase network performance or give ability to process higher traffic.. What about highest possible troughput someone have achieved ? etc.. tia _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi, Has anyone ever succedded in shaping H323 traffic ? I mean reserve a certain bandwidth for it, in order to have a comfortable Netmeeting, and not be disturbed by downloads & others. I tried with HTB but it doesn''t seem perfect... Thanks for replies, Sam Vous manquez d’espace pour stocker vos mails ? Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

Hello, Could somebody tell me is it possible to use asterisk without RTP proxying in SIP<->H323 calls? I mean exactly what canreinvite=yes option do in SIP<->SIP calls. I don't need a transcoding, only a signaling conversion, and this is possible with some softswitches, so i wondering what about asterisk. Same question about H323<->H323 calls I'm using NuFone

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. I know four commands that let you set an IP

Hi, Thanks to those who hinted on the SIP/H323/Skinny capabilities of asterisk ... I am starting to like this app! :D Now, I successfully managed to bridge SIP to H323 (i don't have skinny phones here). Just a question: Is it possible to have Asterisk "just" as a signalling proxy? i have a flat test network, and i would like the RTP streams to be sent directly end to end (sip phone

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I have implemented qos at my gateway, mostly for speeding up dns and [video,voice] chat traffic and to slow down p2p traffic. It seems every thing is working properly, as by browsing speed has been improved. But I want to test it by sending various traffic and to see through which qdisc the traffic flows, so that i can be certain that it is working the way I want it to work. The rules

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. If I remove all general default routes from

hi, anyone to know a tool that will display more friendly output ... probably a tree like structure (if no cross sections occur)... OR a top like output... thanx raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi, i was looking tcc --help, there seems to be no way to tell tcc to generate output only for specified device i.e. tcc -device eth0 m''I mistaken ? thanx raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

is there a way to LOG & -j OTHER-TARGET packet with one rule, or i have to use two ? raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the

Hi, I have config like this ,... but all traffic goes to the default class 1:4, WHY ? What I'' doing wrong... filters are attached to the root ! tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 4 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:4 htb rate 55kbit ceil 55kbit prio 7 <--default class tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 20Mbit tc qdisc add dev

does someone have expirience with HTB and kernel 2.6.5 and up... Does anyone have tested it with thousand of classes and filters.. How it behaves.. tia _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

hi I would like to ask is the following config correct for what I want to achieve ... Scenario: I have 3 networks 192.168.12.0/24, 192.168.48.0/24, 192.168.56.0/24 and most of the users use 1 IP, some of them more... If I make flat u32-filter search the box will make aprox/max 3 * 256 = 768 checks for every IP, so i''m deciding to deploy u32 hashes.. Here is the config I think to use

Hi, Below is my Linux firewall network configuration: - eth0 - isp 1, IP: 1.1.1.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth1 - isp 2, IP: 2.2.2.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth2 - lan, IP: 172.16.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 eth3 - dmz, 192.168.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 isp 1 gateway: 1.1.1.9 isp 2 gateway: 2.2.2.9 Below is my iptables rules: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables

hi, I have strange problems with HTB and several hundred classes flat structure i.e. root |--50kbps |--30kbps |--50kbps |--80kbps |--100kbps .... several hundred classes like this Ceil is the same as rate. The machine get no more than 2-3% average cpu(2.4Ghz pentium). What happens is that from time to time the traffic got "stalled". I tried numerous things to solve

I have a linux server running Mandrake 10, with the kernel configured with "CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y" options, with 4 ethernet cards: - 2 ethernet used to connect to my lan (eth0=192.168.1.x and eth1=192.168.2.x) - 2 ethernet used to internet connection (2 adsl lines, both with 600/300 kbtis) The two lan are used to share

Unless the bridge keeps stateful inspection data and can reply back to the session''s origin, not it route then its fine. The only way I can see this working is either putting the FTP/.. DMZ behind the firewall giving true firewall protection for all services involved, or if you just want to kludge the current solution, you can perform a DNAT/SNAT interface bounce like the following: #