similar to: callback executed like after_save but after transaction

Hi, I have a legacy database ''old'' and a new database ''new'' which rails uses. I set up models using old with establish_connection(old), and this works well, except for include: class OldModel < ActiveRecord::Base establish_connection(old) end class NewModel < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :old_model end a = OldModel.find :first NewModel.find(:all,

We''re migrating a Rails 2.3.x application to Rails 3 and RSpec 2.x. In Rails 2.3.x we were using https://github.com/freelancing-god/after_commit to provide after_commit functionality (now provided by Rails 3). The plugin version of after_commit came with some helpers to make testing with `use_transactional_fixtures = true` work. From: https://github.com/freelancing-god/after_commit

Hi! I''m trying to extend ActiveRecord''s find method (Rails 1.0, Ruby 1.8.2), but I recognize a strange behaviour of the "alias_method" call. I wrote a very simple script to explain my problem: ------------------------------------------------------ module ActiveRecordExtension def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) base.class_eval do

I have a Production model, which represents a farmer''s crop. After create (via after_save) I call a method that creates one or more Supply models, which represent a week of anticipated product harvest. After each of those are created, a class method gets called that tries to match each new Supply with outstanding orders for the same time period. If a match is made, a transaction (an

I''ve asked this before, but never got a working response. I''d like to store an object inside a binary field in my db. So I''d have a class like this class MyAwesomeClass def do_something_awesome ... end end then class MyRecord < ActiveRecord::Base end the table my_record would have a binary field, my_object, that would store an object of

There''s a small inconsistency in ActiveRecord''s callback syntax that has tripped me up before. It wouldn''t be a big deal, but it can lead to a silent failure. I''d like to suggest that it either be made consistent or be made to fail loudly. The issue is that to do something before validating, but only when creating, you use `before_validation on: :create`,

Hey guys, Firstly, I''m new to the list and great work with backgroundrb, it''s sweet!!! I''ve just started noticing an issue and i''m wondering if there is a standard fix. The situation is as follows: 1. In my model''s after_save I call my worker asynchronously with the active record object''s id as a parameter (the record that has just

Hello, I've been trying to set this UPS up on a Synology NAS DS218+ which uses NUT, and even though they are using NUT, they don't have all drivers available as NUT has them at NUT's website. Please see that below: root at DSAltaCloud:/usr/syno/etc/ups# upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller DSM6-2-1-newmodel-repack-23796-180722 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID

Like with simple table editing, there are also typical ways of how a user usually interacts with one-to-many or many-to-many relations. For example, one would show the fields of one row of table1 in the screen and below a line-by-line view of all associated entries in table2. Then, one could press an "Edit" button and add or delete rows from table2 to this entry of table1,

Hello, I''m developing an app that basically, receives a 10MB or less XLSX files with +30000 rows or so, and another XLSX file with about 200rows, I have to read one row of the smallest file, look it up on the largest file and write data from both files to a new one. I just did a test reading a few rows from the largest file using ROO (Spreadsheet doesn''t support XSLX and

Hi List! May I tap into your combined common sense ? I have a legacy logging app that needs to be modernized. At the moment, Data is going to be stored in 5 tables, one table is going to contain more than 200 million and 2 others about 60 million rows. Mysql will be used, unless someone sees a major advantage in using something else (at the moment data is stored in a raw positioned file format,

Dear all Please see the following module, In module SX3 SX4 and SX5 have similar class Tasklist, but inherit from different class. I will use the following code to connect to different data sources RemoteSX3Model.establish_connection sx3_hash RemoteSX4Model.establish_connection sx4_hash RemoteSX5Model.establish_connection sx5_hash How can I refactor my code in module to look simpler? Thank you

what is the proper way to loop through a list in a rails view (assuming that you need to check if it is empty or not) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Rails 3 adds after_commit and after_rollback callbacks, but it appears they are not available as methods in an Observer. Is that the way it''s supposed to be, an oversight, or am I doing it wrong? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rubyonrails-core/i2k7dn-jRVg/discussion What do you think about bringing the possibility to test after_commit hooks while also using transactional fixtures to rails 4? Would the approach used here https://gist.github.com/1169763 be acceptable? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.

Hello, I am still reading Agile Web Developer pdf, it says about after_initialize and after_find. There is a Joe asks part when I read that they are special, however I didn''t really get the idea, why they are. On rubyonrails.org in the manual there is some sort description about their speciality, however their full descriptions are missing. What are the difference between

Does after_save in a model delete if an exception is raised in there? I simply did def after_save raise ''hmmm'' end and it raised the exception but there was nothing in the database. I removed that entire method and its in the database. Is this correct? Thank You, Ben Johnson E: bjohnson@contuitive.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

How to update attribute(s) and save a record instance without triggering the hooks: after_save, after_create, after_update? I know it''s possible with Record.update() but this is dynamic. Only receive the instance, without knowing its class (thus cannot call the class method update()). Or is there a way of knowing the class and calling the class method? Thank you. -- Posted via

Hi all - I''ve got a model Foo that has an after_save() method. I''d like to disable it while doing a rake conversion. Seems I should be able to just redeclare Foo.after_save() somehow, but I''m not quite sure how to do that in the rake task... Any ideas? Thanks! -philip

does after_save get called if failed save? Thanks, Chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.