similar to: tc show error for ingress

I am successfully running ingress (IMQ) and egress (HTB) shaping on a bridge. Is there any way to combine and share the bandwidth between ingress and egress? Example: I have set up www service for egress at 128 KB and ingress at 256 KB. The shaping on them works fine separately. However, I want to create a single virtual pipe for www traffic and limit both ingress and egress combined to 256 KB.

Hi guys , i am starting to "play" with qos in linux. Well , i am trying to setup an ingress filter but i do not know why it is not working. tc add qdisc dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 160kbit burst 256kbit drop flowid :1 After that : iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle --sport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 So , i think this

Hello everybody on the list, I have the following situation where I want to police the speed of incoming packets from specific subnets to 1024kbps and then police all the rest to 256kbps, which is the speed my ISP grants for the rest of the internet. So, eth1 is the one connected to the cable modem and then to the internet. I do: tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress handle ffff: then: tc filter

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics reporting. I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? Rajesh

I''m trying to do some very simple rate-shaping on an interface. I want to limit my 100baseT interface to 7 megs both ingress and egress of the interface. I''ve been hacking my way through the documentation and some examples and I''ve come up with the following configuration for tcng that seems to do what I want. I''m curious if some of the other experts out

Hi all, I''m looking for the best way to set up a Linux router with "tc" to limit the incoming bandwidth my ISP''s clients use. Please assist me with the following: Diagram: INTERNET | | | |eth0 ----------- Linux router/shaper |eth1 | | | --------------- Clients1(64k)/2(128k)/3(64k)/... Clients normally purchase bandwidth in bundles of

Hi all, It is my understanding that with HTB, the rate and the ceiling are divided over the elements of the class. E.g. using a rate of 100 kb and a ceiling of 2000 kb for a class with 10 elements on a 100Mb NIC, the effect of the ceiling will be that if all elements are generating their maximimum possible trafic they will be effectively limited to ~ ceiling / number of elements, in this case

Hi! I am learning tcng without having experiance of tc and I am trying to build something that shall schedule traffic dependent on the value in the IPv4 packets ip_ttl field. I have read the tcng reference manual and cannot find information about forwarding. Is it possible to farward packets from ingress to egress without sending them upwards in layers?

Hi All, I''m trying to do some traffic shaping on an ethernet bridge. Currently, I have the following setup working: ifconfig eth0 down brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl stp br0 off ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig br0 up This creates a bridge consisting of eth0 and eth1. So far so good. I now want to use tc to shape traffic

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class

Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ Please Guide -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi all! I''m working in a " _really_ end user simple", yet powerfull, flexible, scalable, GPL htb/htb-init front end, but now, in the "test fase" im facing an utlimate problem... Absoult minimalistic scenario: #Use a FIXEDFONT to read this #inet-ethx-|FIREWALL|-lan-ethx <-> |client_host_1| # #FIREWALL class(rate,ceil) at lan-ethx

I would like to test police in ingress. I use kernel 2.4.20. I use this configuration: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1001 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1002 -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1003 -j

Guys Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great input! I don''t want to mention names, I''ll most certainly leave someone out. With this mail I''d like to test some theory on bandwidth management, with my own successes and failures during the past year. Sharing a link between 200

Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and

How to use IFB as replacement of IMQ There is not much documentation about it Please explain with example -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello, after spending several hours reading archives, I decided to write new post. I successfully set up packet classification, made some basic HTB setup, made some simple graphical representation from HTB statistics data... BUT, I cannot figure out how to refine HTB to get this behaviour: I need that class "p2p" should be the last one to get some link capacity. If I set both RATE

Hello, I am using the following iptables POSTROUTING rule to NAT some RFC 1918 addresses: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.19.23 ! 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j SNAT --to-source 10.32.4.2 (I am using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE for performance reasons). I have several addresses on the 192.168.0.0/16 subnet that I am SNAT''ing similarly. Problem is, ''tc

Hello, i noticed that the ingress qdisc is not working properly anymore in 3.0.4-1 (back in 3.0.2 the ingress qdisc was working for me): Install the ingress qdisc to peth0: # tc add qdisc dev peth0 ingress ... generate some traffic ... # tc -s qdisc show dev peth0 qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sent 324884 bytes 1749 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues