similar to: Conditional "link_to" helper function - AYUDAME POR FAVOR

Hello, I am trying to run the following model: domi ~ type*ratio+((1|id)+(0+type|id)+(1|face_id)+(1|car_id)) My question is whether the data coding for "face_id" and "car_id" variables is correct. As you see on the following sample data structure, "type" is repeated measure where 1=car, 0=face. Thus, I coded "face_id" as "0" when the type is 1

Hello, I know it''s off-topic. But I''m sure you are using SQL and can help me ;) I''ve a table CARS and a table KEYS and a LOCKS table. CARS id|name 1|audi 2|ford 3|mazda 4|porsche ... KEYS id|car_id|lock_id 1|1|1 2|2|1 3|2|2 4|3|1 5|3|2 6|4|1 7|4|2 8|4|3 ... LOCKS id|name 1|main 2|spare 3|engine ... A car can have many keys. Keys are for different locks. How can I

I am trying to give a quota of how many instructions can be run to a program. So create a simple function as below: define void @add_gas(i64 %gasCost) { __virtual_entry: %0 = load i64, i64* @__WAVM__XX__gGasUsed ### I am sure it exists, same as the __WAVM__XX__gGasLimit %addtmp = add i64 %0, %gasCost %1 = load i64, i64* @__WAVM__XX__gGasLimit %cmptmp = icmp sgt i64 %addtmp, %1 br i1

Hi,all, I find clang's integrated-as changes fast, My code which can't be compiled by llvm3.1 tool-chain can be compiled by llvm3.2 tool-chain now. However, there are still existing link-errors. My develop environment is: Apple LLVM version 4.2 (clang-425.0.24) (based on LLVM 3.2svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.1 Thread model: posix the code is attached, I get this error (there is no

Thanks, Renato. I'm actually porting a project which is based on GAS to iOS platform. I'll report my result. Best regards! ashi On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > I don't think there is such a document... > > There isn't a 1:1 compatibility assurance with any syntax, including the UAL and GAS, but there is good

I have two classes: a Widget and a User. The User has an id that is referenced in two places on the Widget: owner_id and operator_id. How should I structure that reference for has_many? Thanks folks - I appreciate any help on this. --David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

Hey all, I''m using a simple search function. It''s working great except for foreign keys. I have one table pets (id,name,owner_id) and another table people(id,name) owner_id being a foreign key of pet pointing to people name. here it is on the pet controller: @paginator, @pets= paginate(:pets, :conditions =>["name OR owner_id like

Hello there, Im currently taking a Senior Design Course at my college. We are developing an online document editor prototype with Rails. I am not well-versed in Rails. As a matter of fact, we chose it for the project in order to learn it. The problem we have is the following: We have a User model (id, username, password, email) and we have a Document model (id, name, content, owner_id). A

Can someone please help me with this. I have an Images table :- create table images ( id integer unsigned not null auto_increment primary key, image varchar(200) not null default '''' )ENGINE=InnoDB default CHARSET=latin1; And a car table :- create table cars ( id integer unsigned not null auto_increment primary key, user_id integer unsigned not null, title varchar(100) not

My application is going to have a work queue of scheduled tasks stored in the DB. This work queue will be shared across multiple Rails app servers. I need a way to ensure that no two servers get the same jobs if multiple servers pop jobs off the top of the queue simultaneously. Is there a fairly simple way to acheive this? Or do I need to come up with some fancy secondary server to dispatch

I have two models Club and users. users are regular authenticated users and some of them might create a club. A club can also have members (essentially users) and there are attributes and models that apply to member but not to users. Here is what I have right now. Club => belongs_to :user User => has_many clubs (since a user can host multiple clubs). Now how do I fit this member model

Sorry if this is a really lame question, I''m sure it''s something fairly obvious, but I just can''t see it at the moment... I''m trying to add something simple to the model for a project management/todo list/thing. The DB has ''first_name'' and ''last_name'', and I''d like to have "full_name" available. So -

Hi there, I''ve got installed ajax_scaffold_generator (3.1.2, 2.2.1) Anyway I''m following the example here <http://height1percent.com/ articles/2006/04/18/ajaxscaffold-3-1-0-released> which suggests the following in a model file: -------------------------------------------------------- require ''ajax_scaffold'' class Pet < ActiveRecord::Base

I have Users who can "own" Projects. There is only one owner. Users in general can be authorized to view certain projects. Here is my initial stab at this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :projects # ownership has_many :project_viewers, :dependent => :destroy has_many :projects, :through => :project_viewers, :uniq => true ... end class

I have been working through an upgrade of my 1.2.6 application to 2.2.2. I am almost there but I have hit a problem with ActiveRecord. Before the upgrade, the following code was working fine. def create_root(administrator) root = create_root_collection(self.pingee_name, administrator,

I''ve got two tables: "colors" has a color and id column and rows "red", "green", blue". "cars" has maker and id columns and rows for "ford", "chevy", "dodge". I''ve got a 3rd table, inventory. It''s got columns for car_id, color_id and qty. So I''d like to display a table on screen that

No matter what I try I''ve been unable to work how to get this to work with the cool ActiveRecord helpers. I''m not sure if it''s possible, Josh Susser''s blog suggests it is, but damned if I can work it out... I have: Container which can contain one or more Element. An Element is a polymorph of either a Container or a Chunk. An Element can exist in one or more

So is the official stance as per edge rails that multiple class definitions must go into separate files? I was trying to use STI with acts_as_attachment, to have all my attachment classes go into a single file, for example: attachment.rb class Attachment < ActiveRecord::Base end class UserPicture < Attachment belongs_to :user, :foreign_key => ''owner_id''

> I need a simple blog with categories and comments and an archive. I want a > nice posting system, but don''t want it in HTML. Is there something I can add > or make, kind of like BBCODE? http://whytheluckystiff.net/ruby/redcloth/ http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/RedCloth > I pretty much know what else I have to do, but there is one more thing. A > client section.

I''d like to always add a condition to any version of "find" (e.g. Thing.find(), Thing.find_by_name(), Thing.find_by_whatever) so that in addition to whatever conditions are set, an additional condition is set :conditions=>"user_id=#{current_user.id}" I''d like to make sure that a user only sees/edits/creates entries in the database that have the user_id