similar to: Re: Still with HTB..

Original Message: ----------------- From: Stef Coene stef.coene@docum.org On Saturday 19 April 2003 12:10, GoMi wrote: >> Stef, if you are interested in working around this problem, maybe we >could >> meet in a chat room, and you can login to my box and see what happens, >> interested? >Yes, but not now. But I can check it out myself. >How do this DAP works? Do they

Kazaa, DAP, FlashGet, or anything that can consume high bandwidth welcome. I am not affraid anymore my clients open any program like that. With HTB qdisc every host get its allocated bandwidth fairly. The key is in SFQ leaf, with QUANTUM and PERTURB value that you must set correctly according to your needs. I am not so sure if you should create each host in one single class. I want to try my

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

Hello, Besides a very good functionality, I have a small, yet stressing, problem. Let''s say I have a bandwidth of N bits. I have X clients, everyone with his fixed bandwidth. I create htb qdsics for each client. Each leaf has sfq queueing discipline. A sample config would be like this : tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:346 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 32Kbit burst 4k

>From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> >To: tony.cheung@asiayeah.com, > Tony Yat-Tung Cheung <dragonman@asiayeah.com>, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simulation with Packet Lost and Packet Delays >Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:03:27 +0100 > >On Sunday 21 December 2003 16:31, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote: > > >>Hi All, >> >>I would

Hello all, I am testing CBQ and HTB these days and I got a lots problem which needs your help. It is a little long text :) Thank you! (All my test is based on Redhat Linux9.0) 1.Is isolated of CBQ working? I have read Mr. stef word that he never made cbq isolated work. 2. I have setup an environment to test cbq: one tcp flow which I should protect and a noisy udp flow who will eat much of the

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Because these tend to get lost, here are some links that I think everyone should know about: wiki: http://linux-net.osdl.org API: http://www.coverfire.com/lql/ Stef Coene: (Broken? I hope not. This is excellent stuff!) http://www.docum.org/docum.org/ Jason Boxman: http://edseek.com/~jasonb/articles/traffic_shaping/ Dan Singletary:

Hi, Steff. Next file are not found on your website: http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tc-snmp//example/html/mrtg.cfg can you post it ? Thank you ! Andres _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi Stef, Reffering to page < http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/7.html > I found a para as follows, " CBQ is not always as accurate as it should be. See docum.org on the test page for some tests with bounded classes. The algorithm used by cbq is very "link sensitive". It calculates the link idle time and for that it needs the real link bandwidth, average

Dear folks, Here goes my bandwidth manager: INTERNET | |eth0 202.14.41.1 BW.Manager | | | +----eth1----192.168.1.0/24 | +------eth2----192.168.2.0/24 Total incoming bandwidth to eth0 is 1024kbps should be shared to eth1 and eth2, which mean each get 512Kbps and burstable to 1024Kbps if other host is idle. My question is how do i apply HTB to these situation ? As far as i know eth1 and eth2

About the cbq.init. Four machines which traffic to limit in same LAN. Is the samething if I put limiting rules to four different files or all to the same file? Like: DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.0.5 RULE=192.168.0.6 RULE=192.168.0.7 RULE=192.168.0.8 OR four equal files with different IPs, Ids and no PARENT rule? What style of ID numbering you use if

Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB regards emil _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I''m subscribed to this mailing list for a long time. During that time, I enjoyed reading all posts and try to understand them :) LARTC started as a something I could use to impress my boss. After a while it became clear to me that my boss was not impressed ;(, but I kept following this list because it was fun. I also placed a lot documentation online on

Hi, machine: AMD K6 200 MHz Linux distribution: Mandrake 8.1 kernel: compiled 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and

Hello all, I have using htb for last 10-12 months to manage the bandwidth share. Until last month everything was ok, but now after a kernel upgrade (from 2.4.20 to 2.4.26 because a kernel bug that generate a oops) the Linux router is droping packets. It is weird because the "tc -s class ls dev eth1" (in the class I monitor) reports no packet drop, the "tc -s qdisc ls dev

I used Stef Coene''s snmp.pl. #./tc.sh #./get_snmp.pl #./snmp.pl #tc -s class ls dev eth0 class htb 20:1 root rate 80Mbit ceil 80Mbit burst 106440b cburst 106440b Sent 674762 bytes 5660 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 3bps lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 8313 ctokens: 8313 class htb 20:10 parent 20:1 rate 40Mbit ceil 80Mbit burst 54017b cburst 106440b Sent 670753

Hello again, I have a router/nat linux box. I managed to create some HTB classes and everything is OK. When perople are usig download managers like FlashGet and DAP (multiple connection ones), the ceil limiting works okay, but the rate parameter is somehow useles... The guaranteed bandwidth is never reached. So what can I do to limit the number of connections/computer? I want to make sure that