similar to: routing strategies for 2 adsl setup

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't understand?

Just to clarify, I'm looking at this from an application layer Point of View. One of the reasons why I'm looking at it that way, is because Tim said he was looking at LinuxHA..."application level" redundancy that uses IP. Tim, just to let you know, I don't believe that LinuxHA will work in the way you described, only because of the different IP ranges. It looks like Linux

I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn''t get any answers. The problem is that traffic doesn''t get into the user classes (~150) when I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I dont''t associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well.

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 ------- Additional Comments From fhagur@gmail.com 2007-04-17 05:04 MET ------- I have been wondering about this bug and had similar problems myself here in my Debian system, linux-kernel 2.6.18 iptables 1.3.6. I too saw that some packets became transmitted illegally through the ppp0 interface, when they just shoudn't. What I

http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm ----Quote---- "The impact of this vulnerability varies by vendor and application, but in some deployment scenarios it is rated critical. Please see the vendor section below for further information. Alternatively contact your vendor for product specific information. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow an attacker to create a

We currently have a backup site at a different location to our main site. This backup site mirrors (as closely as possible) our main services, particularly web serving. Is there a way to have the backup site act as a failover for the main site using something like Linux-HA? They are on seperate internet connections with different IP ranges. Thanks -- Tim Edwards

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1) Category: contrib Module: tcpdump Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1) Category: contrib Module: tcpdump Announced:

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

Hi, I plan to implement a redundant Internet connection using BGP on 2 different Linux Routers. The routing daemon software I will be using is Zebra (zebra.org). I''m wondering if I should have my Linux firewall behind the 2 BGP routers, or could I keep the shorewall on both BGP routers? Has anyone had any experience with this? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Sam

hi all, first i wann to explain my network & it''s problem, i am using a redhat el5 for multigateway routing, i have 3 adsl lines which is connected with eth0, eth2 and eth3. eth1 is my local network. those 3 lines comes with adsl modem from same isp with equal bandwidth (512 Kbps). In this adsl modems there is one lan and one wan port, adsl modem''s lan ip is gateway for my

I am planning to replace our cisco 7200 core router with Linux. We currently serve around 1500 (3/4 DSL - different router) customers with probably half of them being concurrent at any given time. We have a fiber network and customers currently aren''t managed as far as how much bandwidth they can use at anytime. Therefore I have constructed a working tc qdisc Linux router as a test. It

Refering to pppoe i have next problem : I asked my isp if i can buy a class of real ip`s to be routed by them. They said elegantly it can`t be done . I want opinions . I am using an ADSL connection through a Speedtouch 510 configured in bridge. About Bgp : i asked someone if i can peer 2 different locations on 2 different ip`s using private asn number and he said yes , and what i don`t

Hi - I am trying to find a Linux based solution for one of my clients, I want to bond two adsl lines into one, with redundancy (if one fails the other does all the work). I''ve been looking into ECMP (Equal Cost Multipath), I know BGP would work, but something like ECMP would be much simpler. I have full control of both ends of the connections and I can have both ADSL lines terminate in

Last week someone in my localnetwork "abused" from our link, making everything slow... So I want to put the current Linux router as a traffic shaper. The setup is: +--- 128Kbit | "International" Local net --- [Linux router with ] -- ISP -- [magic routers]

OOPS <blush> http://vcalinus.gemenii.ro/quaggarealms.html is what should have been posted by me... This deals with the metropolitan / other issues, I think. I can''t read it... -- gypsy

I''ve read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I''ve read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP and port for the traffic. What I would like to do is 1) from the ISP standpoint,

Hello, I am trying to make a load balance at my box using two conections. I have compile my kernel with this patch routes-2.6.13-12.diff (tha I get from this website: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/~julian/#routes). The problem is that when I try to balance using weight sintaxe (i will put the script bellow) some conectios just drop. So I can enter some pages but other I could not...