similar to: ensure game server latency

Dear list, I have experimented some time now with HTB queues, and have received a lot of help from this list, especially from Stef. Thank you. My currect Shaper looks like this: http://www.designobjekt.de/test/rc.trafficshaper Unfortunately I still experience lags of this type: -players from the internet playing on my server feel lags -I feel lags when I play on a different server on the

Hi Guys, I''ve prepared a simple writeup on how to implement QoS/Trafficshaping using Shorewall and a Hacked Version of Wondershaper-1.1a. After searching through the net for 1+ month, I finally found a solution to my bandwidth hog problem. However, due to the fact that I do not have a personal Webpage I am offering anyone who''s interested this document in a

Hi all :) I''m new to this list, as I''m new too to traffic shaping ;) I''ve set up an FTP server in my ADSL line and I wanted it to serve as fast as possible as long as I don''t use my outgoing ADSL bandwidth, and I''m currently using HTB for that (succesfully, I must add). The problem is (when the FTP server is serving higher than its

I don''t know whether this is the right place to ask, but kindly point me to an FM that I can R if it isn''t. My wife is creating lots of Kazaa traffic, and I am using rsync to create a full mirror of Red Hat''s FTP site, Aurora Linux FTP site, the LDP site, and some other stuff. Clearly, when one is moving well over 100GB over a 128 Kbps link, this is going to take a

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

greetings all, i''ve searched high and low for this, but can''t seem to find an answer anywhere.. having read the docs and the wondershaper script itself, it occurred to me that the documentation promises an immediate drop in interactive app latency, specifically mentioning SSH as a big winner. however, looking through the script i can''t really tell just *how*

Hi, first of all, let me thank you for your great Shoreline Firewall. I use it with great success at home (protecting my WiFi connection). And now if I could have a question about traffic shaping. I did read everything I could find but I still have two problems: first, the MARK from tcrules is not working in HTB based simple tc filter line ("handle $MARK fw classid 1:20"). If I switch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Hi everybody! I know this discussion list isn´t just about wondershaper, but i think someone can help me. I used to have a linux box running red hat 8, as firewall on my lan. I upgraded to debian 3.0 and tried to use the same wondershaper files under debian, but, when i run wondershaper on ppp0 device, it just stops transfering. Remember: its the same files i used with success under red hat 8.

I''m currently building a firewall for a network with 2 ISP links. Unfortunately, one of the ISP''s doesn''t support BGP yet, otherwise I would be doing load balancing at the router, instead of the firewall. I''ve been trying to find information on how to get WonderShaper working, but everything I''ve found talks about setting it up for a firewall with one

Hi all, ive got wondershaper working well with the highest download while maintaing minimal latency but the problem is this: ive got 2 nics in the linux router eth0 and eth1. eth1= internet interface but this is connected to a router say 10.0.0.190, now off that router there are other servers, mail server, domino server etc now if i shape on eth1 ingress and egress using the wondershaper script

Hi ! I´ve been using the wonderful wondershaper from chapter 15.8 of the LARTC Howto for some time. It´s really wonderful. Actually, I use the version from http://freshmeat.net/projects/wshaper/?topic_id=87 Now I tried to put some hosts to low priority, and it doesn´t work. The traffic is splitted equally between the noprio and the other hosts. Is this because I use ip masquerading, and all

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi I am very unclear about the wonder shaper and a bit of a novice with Unix all together I have a question for you and I hope you can answer Basically my office is getting a couple of people slowing down the network so ive been looking around and found wondershaper What I want to know is that can I rather than having low priority ports have it with high priority ports And

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

I''ve been using the wondershaper 1.1 with much success. My problem is that I want to guarantee bandwidth to mail/VPN & web surfing and make sure that I don''t break the existing script. If not how do I make sure that I can guarantee bandwidth for mail, VPN & web surfing without hurting ftp uploads. Thanks

Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range? I have a ftp server on port 65432 and passive ports 50000-60000. Is there a way to set a range? or do they have to be individually listed? The following doesnt seem to work: # low priority source ports NOPRIOPORTSRC=65432, 50000:60000 # low priority destination ports NOPRIOPORTDST= Mark