similar to: Using multiple uplinks

Hi, after migrating to shorewall firewall from my own iptables rule set (to utilise freeswan vpn tunnels) I have successfully configured a 3 interface firewall with net2net vpn tunnels, with the help of the shorewall documentation. However I cannot seem to configure my final step which is to masq another subnet attached to my LAN (LANB, via Cisco 1603 router) to get internet access via the

Could you inform the Shorewall work with four internet interfaces adapters? and how I do? thank''s Antonio de Jesus S. Nascimento (5561) 3033-7728 / 9933-9500 Security OpenSource - Soc para o desenv e Implant da Tec da Segurança da Informação utilizando Software Livre www.securityopensource.org.br

Atencao: samba@samba.org. Um Virus foi encontrado numa mensagem de Email que acabou de ser enviada por voce. Este scanner de Email a interceptou e impediu a mensagem de chegar no seu destino. O Virus foi reportado como sendo: the W32/Netsky.p@MM virus !!! Por favor atualize seu antivirus ou contate o seu suporte tecnico o mais rapido possivel pois voce tem um virus no seu computador.

Hello ! I''m trying hard to make gpl xen pv drivers  work in windows 2000 server. I have edited all inf files as described by James Harper and successfully installed all drivers, but when i boot with /gplpv i get the same  bsod that Kris Adler got.  I am running  xen  3.2.1 on gentoo with kernel 2.6.21. I have tested it several times with all versions of xen pv drivers ( last

Hi, I read the howto of iproute, I have the same case with HOWTO, the difference is that the whole incoming traffic goes through interface 0, the other difference is that I do not want to balance the out going traffic, because I have specific networks to take it throughout another interface. Mi Case IF1 --> Input and Output IF2 --> Only aoutput for three Network I need Help, How can I

Hi! I had two uplinks till today. We stopped one of them today, so i thought i could share my experience. (it is maybe useful for somebody) I hadn''t managed to configure it using a LARTC howto, but the Nano-howto (http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt) and julian''s kernel patches. I had some problems with icq connections, because it is a two step connection (It is just theory). 1.

provide me complete detail of your linux box like firewall script (iptables script), kernel''s .config file, multigatway file (i.e. /sbin/ip ....... commands file) so i can check and try to resolve your issue. sonu.... --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

Hi. Contents: 1) Introduction 2) 2 Questions * Introduction: I used this HOWTO to use multiple providers. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html The box is a load balancer, using the Linux Virtual Server. We have a problem with lost connections, and it seems you get issues when you combine this setup with DNAT [1]. The proposed solution [1] is to use these rules to mark

Next week I''m replacing my single SDSL connection with two ADSL connections. I''ve got a plan for dealing with this, but I''d like any thoughts on potential problems I might run into. My goal is not to load balance the bandwidth (yet), but I do want to run all traffic through a single router. At the moment this router only has one ethernet port for both of the ADSL

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

I am hoping that someone with more experience and knowledge than I can assist me in finding a solution ;) We have a RedHat AS4 box with 5 interfaces. Two interfaces serve two different networks and two interfaces connect to two different uplinks. The fifth interface is our management interface. Since a picture is worth a thousand words I attempted to come up with a diagram:

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hello, I''m trying to achieve the following. 2 ISP''s and 1 LAN with failover. So, when 1 internet connection fails the other need to take over. I''m aware of the restrictions. The current sessions are lost. I did this before, one and a half year ago or something. But at that router wasn''t failover. Now i''ve read the nano howto and followed it.

hello, my name is Denny. I am new in this list. I am trying use multiple uplinks as describe in the lartc documentation (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) with squid transparent proxy in my gateway server. let me draw the configuration : /----------------- -----DSL1-----| \ |Transparent proxy |----Local network -----DSL2-----|

Hello everyone. I've stumbled upon a strange networking issue with multiple interfaces on CentOS 5. The network setup is just like the diagram in http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html It looks like linux is not routing correctly outgoing packets on interfaces different from the one of the default gateway, but instead broadcasts an ARP request on the link, looking for the

Hello, I am trying something crazy here. I have gone through the old archives, lartc.org and lot''s of documentation, but still something is wrong. Here is the situation; The server is Fedora core 2 running kernel 2.6.5 I have 2 uplinks to two different ISP''s. (It will be 3-4 in the future). These ISP''s should serve the bandwith to local clients with multiple subnets.

Hello! I have set up a LINUX router with two seperate uplinks to do load balancing. I made all the configuration after the "NANO-HOWTO to use more than one independent Internet connection" document. I patched my 2.4.24 kernel with patches, described in this document. My configuration is: --------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash

Folks, Ive got two ISP connections that I am using with: --- ip route add 192.168.200.0/24 dev eth2 src 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip route add default via 192.168.200.1 table connection1 ip route add x.175.244.0/24 dev eth1 src x.175.244.2 table connection2 ip route add default via x.175.244.1 table connection2 ip rule add from 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip rule add from x.175.244.2