similar to: I got scammed of $150 due to email phishing. Beware

I was wondering if anyone thought of applying filters to email post delivery, pre-read. Basically the idea would be to head off Spam, Malware or Phishing for already delivered email. Malware would probably be the least likely target, as (knock on wood) user workstations would be updated, but a targeted phishing scam would not create a public signature that would be downloaded, yet an

Boonex is a scam. I had to purchase their "Advanced" membership first to be able to contact anyone to ask questions or get help. Then after purchasing a license for $39 I posted on their forums and was dog piled by their staff and premium members who have been around so long they forgot how to be polite. I never got the software working because most hosts have restrictions for the .EXE

Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although

I am compiling svn head LLVM at the moment and I keep getting requests for password, which never used to occur before, followed by: Connection closed by 147.32.84.4, which is some site in Amsterdam. This occurs at this point in the make execution: make[3]: Entering directory `......./llvm/lib/Target/X86' Is this genuine, or has someone hacked the code and inserted some phishing attack into

[ Sorry, I did not see the renamed thread until I'd already replied on the old one. Calling this a phishing attack is exactly right. ] On 2010-01-30, Joachim Schipper wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you argue that connecting to malicious > hosts is currently secure, and will remain secure, but that it will > become easier to convince people to send the passphrase for

Joel Hammer wrote on Friday, 6 June 2003 8:46 a.m.: > Which, BTW, is how we could easily stop all spamming. If we all > respond to the spammers, that would but them out of business in one > day. So, all of us on this list should agree to respond to the > spammer hitting us, telling him we are interested. That would make > these guys stop spamming this list. The problem with

FYI/Heads up, I /just/ received what looks like a phishing attempt for information about Open Source PBX usage. It says it comes from Digium but all the links (including the one for digium.com) point elsewhere. Rod --

Hi List! any body use www.simpletelecom.com? I subscribe to www.simpletelecom.com for A-Z termination and paid US$15.00 and US$70.00 via credit card in two days, but my account has US$15.00 only. I checked my credit card from the bank and they said me the payment already paid to merchant. I've lost US$70.00 :( so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM? Thanks! </Madhawa>

hello list, I subscribe to Sixtel.net for a DID just to see how it worked. they say DID active inmediatly , but after 4 days , I have no DID , I tried to call tech support office and it seems they all ways are in hollidays, a support ticket no good luck, I call back service also not good luck. so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM? fortunally only put there $10 bucks but

This appears to be not as bad as I first feared. I had been using llvm previously on a remote machine and for some inexplicable reason a fresh compilation on my local machine wanted to make a connection to the remote one, in the context of: Updated Intrinsics.gen because Intrinsics.gen.tmp changed significantly. Though why this should be necessary, or useful, is beyond me.

Sorry about taking up the bandwith here, I have solved this interesting bug of my own now. It turns out I had inadvertently inserted a shell script into my search path which happened to have the same name as one of the more obscure system programs used in the LLVM Makefile execution and this was trying to connect to the remote machine instead of getting on with the job.... a warning against using

Did anyone else just get what looks like a phising attempt pretending to be from digium? It appears to be full of links to http://app.en25.com/e/er.aspx I must admit, it looks genuine.

> A problem with that, it's a bit cumbersome. You have to realize what the > cause of the problem, so that adding the flag will fix it (why is ssh > failing anyway?). And then check the exact syntax. And write that, on the > command-line. It is another option though. Personally, I set IdentitiesOnly yes as the global default in ~/.ssh/config, and explicitly set the preferred key

While I was running dovecot 1.2.9, I had my mailboxes using the old Courier IMAP format. i.e. my mailboxes would look like INBOX.Orders.Scams Going to dovecot 2 (but not 2.1), I see to have a few questions: 1) It seems I would device my mailbox thingies in 10-mail.conf: namespace inbox { inbox = yes separator = . location = prefix = INBOX. type = private mailbox SPAM {

I've paid them, tried to provision numbers, e-mailed support, instant messaged support, and got nowhere. I highly recommend everyone stays away from this provider.

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon > Messmer > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 6:56 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld > > On 01/29/2017 01:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I telnet to localhost 143 or 993 and I can connect, telneting to 25 > > or 465, connection refused.

Did anyone else who purchased the Rails betabook get a telephone call from someone at "Humboldt Merchants" (sp?) asking to verify their purchase, ostensibly to ensure there was no fraud (on the part of the merchant, not the person buying the book)? They knew my name, phone number, the title of the book I bought and the type of credit card I used. They didn''t give or ask for the

Read the free tutorial on Options trading which can teach you the basics. Start Option Trading with Knowledge and Minimum Risk. Read More<http://workfromhomedepot.blogspot.com/2008/01/getting-ready-for-option-trading.html> -- Yours Sincerely Team, Share N Care Blog. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Imagine the following scenario Last Saturday, 3:00 AM a big phishing attack hits our e-mail inboxes. Spamassassin does not mark them as spam, and our 50.000+ users have in their mdbox a very credible phishing attack. What doveadm-fu could I use to delete (or move to spam) that e-mail from each user INBOX (let?s imagine the Subject or a Header is known)? I repeat: already delivered e-mail, how

Hi all, Just finished all of the "annoyance" issues with IE7 and started putting together an IE7 policy template for System Policy Editor. This is just a "beta" release I guess. Get it Here: http://files.pcc-services.com/files/samba/ie7beta1.adm Here is what I included so far: - Always Show Menu bar - Set Menubar to Top Position These two basically make IE7 look more