similar to: Mongrel 0.3.18 PR -- Lightning Fast Turnaround

This small patch extends configure_socket_options to support FreeBSD''s accf_http(9), which defers accept() until there''s a full HTTP request to read. Seems to work fine on 6.1-STABLE. DragonflyBSD should work too provided the /freebsd/ line is modified to match it. accf_http(9): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accf_http&sektion=9 -- Thomas

Hello Minions! It''s *finally* here. Mongrel 1.0 RC1 for everyone to test, even the win32 folks. I managed to get everything to build on windows, including fastthread, and even cleaned up the "releases source":http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ so that it should install cleaner. Win32 will have to try and report problems, as it seems rubygems is real finicky on win32.

Hello Everyone, We''re hard at work getting the hot new win32 service Luis wrote out and ready for production. We''re hoping to have that included in the 1.0 RC1 release we make very soon. This pre-release is just to make sure that we didn''t step on any toes. Install it with: $ gem install fastthread --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases $ gem install

Hello All, I''m putting out a quick half-release because there''s some work on the MIME types I''ve included that needs to be done by all of you. Read at the end to understand your role in what you started. This release features two major capitulations on Mongrel''s stance of not being a full web server. The first is Mongrel now sports a YAML file with 739 MIME

Hi, Thanks Zed - this is very interesting. One item in particular caught my eye: Does anyone on this list have any comments or validation that Rails 1.2.1 is 2-4 times as slow as Rails 1.1.6? Topfunky provided a link that purports what looks like really horrible performance and memory characteristics for Rails 1.2.1, even v. 1.1.6:

With Mongrel 0.3.18, I have not seen a single one of the hangs that I have been grousing about for the past N weeks. Thanks MenTaLguY and Zed! Q: Mongrel loads fastthread, Mongrel loads Rails, Rails loads OCI8, OCI8 requires ''thread''. That means OCI8 is using fastthread too, right? Steve

So I have updated to the latest mongrel and fastthread and my environment is as follows: Debian 3.1 Rails 1.1.6 Ruby 1.8.5 Mongrel 0.3.18 Fastthread 0.4 Mongrel Cluster 0.2.1 Apache 2.2.3 I again woke up this morning to my disappointment of seeing the strange Status: 500 Internal Server error. It happens the same every morning, I have three mongrels running, two give the error, one

Another fancy release with just a few little changes from yesterday: * Set-Cookie, Set-Cookie2, Warning, and WWW-Authenticate are allowed as duplicate headers. * mongrel_rails stop now has a --wait option to go with --force. It will wait for either the given timeout in SECONDS or the PID file to go away. If the PID file goes away it just exits. If the timeout happens then it does a kill -9 on

I just realized -- if fastthread can be included while Mutex-using code is already running, then the definition and replacement of the classes needs to happen atomically. Otherwise, it creates a race condition where a thread can e.g. end up seeing an incompletely defined Mutex class or none at all. fastthread 0.6.1 addresses this by defining the classes and then atomically swapping the constant

Hi folks, I took a break from Mongrel today and instead whipped up an Atom feed generator for my site. People who love or utterly hate my essays will lover or utterly hate to subscribe to it. http://www.zedshaw.com/feed.atom Let me know if it isn''t working well in your favorite feed reader. -- Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu http://www.zedshaw.com/

Calling All Mongrel Minions! I wanna have some fun and would like this as a Christmas present. The site http://www.workingwithrails.com/ has this lame popularity system that''s kind of irking some of the main Ruby contributors. I think it''s kind of funny, but would like to demonstrate what an army of motivated people can do to these kinds of popularity contests. So, as a

Hi, A quick search didn''t explain what fastthread is, and how it relates to mongrel. Why would I want to install fastthread? Thanks, Joe

Just a quick note that I''ve committed the bits for fastthread 0.5; the most important differences are that all the thread.rb classes are once again marshallable, and we''ve got Luis'' commit which eliminates some warnings when building on Win32. -mental -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

I''m setting up a Rails app for a client that uses Windows. I''m getting this error: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.18/lib/mongrel/rails.rb: 32: uninitial ized constant Mongrel::HttpHandler (NameError) from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:21:in `re quire'' from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-0.3.18/bin/

I''m running a site that gets ~30k to 40k page hits per day. In the last 4 days my mongrel processes have been jumping into high CPU usage a couple of times a day to the point where my site becomes unresponsive (database on a diff machine with no load). The only way for me to resolve the problem and reduce load on the machine is to delete my rails cache directory (I have plenty of space

Alright Mongrel people, thanks for contributing to the mayhem around popularity by making me the official King of the Internet. In case you all missed it, here''s my blog post on my first act as King: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2006-12-26.html Stay tuned for pedro. I want to make this reign very democratic and chaotic. (I wonder if the Nitro folks will help with pedro?) The whole

Hey guys, I''m running the mongrel server that comes with rails-1.2rc1 for development on a winxp box, anticipating taking it into production on a win2k3 box in the next few weeks. I''ve had a couple of crashes occur during development that give me pause, however. I made a ticket for the last one here: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6841 I know, or at least believe, that

Hey Everyone, Topfunky (Geoffry) has created a great PeepCode screencast on using httperf to performance measure your web applications: http://nubyonrails.topfunky.com/articles/2007/03/05/peepcode-page-caching-and-httperf http://peepcode.com/products/benchmarking-with-httperf Topfunky put a ton of work into this and really got it right. The attention to detail is very good and he researched

I really wanted to thank everyone personally for voting for me, but man I don''t have the time. So, like a good programmer I just automated it with espeak: $ speak -w thank_you_everyone.wav -s 168 -v en/en-f -p 60 -a 120 -l 50 -f who.txt $ lame -V2 thank_you_everyone.wav thank_you_everyone.mp3 And now you all get a personalized thanks from some electronic British woman:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey, I''ve been using Mongrel for quite some time now but I ran into an issue that threw me back to lighttpd + fastcgi. The application in question was running fine in the production environment with SQLSessionStore and using a mongrel cluster behind a load balancer. However, by switching to a MemcacheSessionStore (using either