similar to: Per Ip bandwidth

Dear R users and developers, Would any of you be interested in giving a lecture about R and/or R use cases at the following free software conference that takes place in Amiens, France, next summer? We already had a talk on R last year by Yves Croissant (http://2006.rmll.info/theme_26?lang=en) but are still open to any submission this year. We expect some talks this year (to be confirmed) about

Hello, I want to ask what am I doing wrong. A few seconds after running this script my gateway freezes. I use the 2.4.1 kernel compiled on RH 7.0 system using the kgcc (egcs-1.1.2) compiler. I have two ethernet cards. The Internet interface eth1 is connected to the ISP, who shapes out traffic to 128Kbit. I would like to give the high priority to the e-mail and ssh traffic and to shape others

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hello! I have an internet connection of 64kbps garanteed in a channel of 256kbps. On this connection the metropolitan speed is 10Mbps and in the provider''s network the speed is 100Mbps. I have a few clients behind my linux box and i want to set up some limitations because some of them are using it irrational. I am marking the packets with 0 for internet; 1 for metropolitan 2 for

Hello, I am new to R. I often collect data at multiple sites and need to create separate graphs (such as scatterplots or histograms) of specific variables for each site. I have tried to do this by splitting the data frame and then using lapply, but it seems that the graphing commands cannot be called as functions. Here is a sample of my data, called "seeddist2": site

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Hello! I have a problem with i detalied in an early mail but there was no answer so i will try to be more specific. i have this tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 64kbit ceil 256kbit burst 15k quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:100 htb rate 32kbit ceil 256kbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100 handle 100: sfq perturb 5 quantum 1500 tc

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?

I have this problem: I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a min speed: Vmax and Vmin. The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the actual bandwidth (you don''t not how much, you only know the speed is between Vmax and Vmin) for N clients. The bandwidth should be shared so nobody can get more bandwidth than the others.

Congratulations to our 2009 Google Summer of Code Students: Claudiu Mihail Liu Aleaxander Claudiu will work on CLI/parser migration to C, and Liu will work on ext4 support and filesystem migration to C. In combination, this should help get Syslinux into a much more portable state. We're looking forward to your work! -hpa

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

i''am new here and i saw some tutorials but those was old for the 2.4.xkernel and i don''t know were to start correctly. many thanks to all of you. sincerly: Timi _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc