similar to: Destination routing and its implementations?

Hello, I''ve got this problem. There is an linux server with 2.4.24 kernel and pinging from him to internet (or from lan) ping randomly jumps up: 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=387 ttl=59 time=30.0 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=388 ttl=59 time=32.6 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=389 ttl=59 time=34.9 ms

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 Summary: inverse limit match doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Mandrake Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 Bug ID: 1124 Summary: manual page does not describe special icmp type of 255 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

Hi all - I've been working on a lite ORM and database abstraction package for R. Formatting complex queries by hand has always been an error-prone hassle, so I've tried to do away with that as much as possible, instead, using R objects to represent elements of a database system (statements, clauses, operators, functions, fields, tables, etc.). R5 classes have made the development of this

For some reason whenever I try and create a timestamp column with migrations and mysql I get a datetime column instead. That''s kind of annoying because I want the column to update every time the row gets changed. Is this a bug, or is there something I can do about it? (Obviously I can manually change my mysql table, but that kind of defeats the point of migrations!) In my migration

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hi everybody, I''m trying to set up routing for 2 links to the internet on a box which produces traffic itself (e.g. DNS) and will route all our local traffic. AS one route is quick and expensive and the other one slow and cheap, I want to be able to route packets for some high-level protocols to the second link. If I correctly understood table 3-2 in

Hello Routing Gurus ;-) I''d like to know if it''s possible to make a routing decision for pakets originating from a specific port of the local machine without using ipfilter/iptables to mark the pakets. I read about the tc filter stuff but that seems only to be able to sort the pakets to a different queue on the same interface and not choose a different interface for example. Is

I found a bug in ActiveRecord. Being a good netizen, I thought I would write a test to illustrate the bug, fix it, and then submit a patch to the maintainers. However, I can''t run the AR tests. I followed the instructions in RUNNING_UNIT_TESTS but it generates an error immediately /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/test cremes$ ruby -I

dose Ruby or ActiveRecord have the Java/JDBC equivalent for retrieving ResultSet meta data... PreparedStatement statement = null; try { statement = connection.prepareStatement("select * from some_table"); ResultSet rs = null; try { rs = statement.executeQuery(); ResultSetMetaData rsMetaData = rs.getMetaData(); int columnCount = rsMetaData.getColumnCount(); more

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=468 Summary: There is no real documentation for knowing how to configure the kernel for iptables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

HI folks, I have a linux router connected to two separate internet connection from an ISP. There is a third interface ( ip -> 192.168.1.1 ) in the router connected to the local network. Configured the routing tables and added the rules and everything seems to be working fine from the routing box. Traceroute to external internet sites reveal that traffic is being routed correctly and

is there anybody who can tell me how to forward request to other host, i would like to forward all dns requests to other dns server and it must be done with packet forwarding because dns server (resolver) must go down. There is many docs about port forwarding based on nat table and explanation consider linux box act like nat with two e cards. thanks, alens

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul rate

Hi, I have the following situation: 1 gateway box with 2 WAN interfaces (eth1 and eth2). 1 LAN interface eth0 default gateway is eth2 I want to route all traffic with destination protocol tcp 22 (ssh) NOT over the default gateway eth2 but force them to find it''s route over eth1. All other traffic must go the normal way over eth2. Is this possible with tc or an other tool? --

Hello! This arguments never run on my system, but I need this: #!/bin/bash -x echo "1" iptables -t mangle -p tcp -d 0/0 --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 2 echo "2" echo "201 T1" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables echo "3" ip rule add fwmark 2 table T1 echo "4" ip route add default via 192.168.21.2 dev eth1 table T1 echo "5" ip route

Hi, I am trying to categorize the network traffic and to send it out across two different providers. For this I mark the packets in the firewall (in the PREROUTING chain of table mangle), and then use another routing table for the marked packets, which has a different gateway from the main routing table. Basicaly I am following the cookbook example in this page:

Buenas erreros!! Una cuestión de las que tengo ciertas dudas es saber en que se diferencian Spark y H2o, si son competencia, si valen para lo mismo o no.... Según lo poco que se, Spark es una manera de agilizar el Map-Reduce, y con la libreria MLlib, puedes hacer datamining de grandes datasheets, y si lo conectas con R o con Python, puedes usar ese lenguaje. H2O es una herramienta que nos

Hello everyone I'm trying to use Scheffe's complete cubic model (mixture design). In the bibliographies, they indicate that the term is of the type: A * B * (A-B). But I see that trying to adjust the three cubic terms results in singularities. I know this implies not having the inverse matrix: solve (t (X)% *% X) does not exist. The bibliographies show all three cubic terms. So my

Hi to all! I am using H2O with R on Ubuntu. I start it using h2o.init() Then I execute my R/H2O code, just h2o.distance(df1,df2) that expends 3 mins to run. When this is runing I do an htop to see the resources, and I see the issue, that only 1 of the 4 available threads is in use. The other 3 at 0%. I check the cluster status with h2o.clusterStatus I see that the number of theards is