bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2017-Feb-20 21:42 UTC
[Bug 1124] New: manual page does not describe special icmp type of 255
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 Bug ID: 1124 Summary: manual page does not describe special icmp type of 255 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter: alexis at m2osw.com When I type `man iptables-extensions` under Ubuntu 16.04, I get a page with the following description of the ICMP type: icmp (IPv4-specific) This extension can be used if `--protocol icmp' is specified. It provides the following option: [!] --icmp-type {type[/code]|typename} This allows specification of the ICMP type, which can be a numeric ICMP type, type/code pair, or one of the ICMP type names shown by the command iptables -p icmp -h As we can see, there is no word about the "Note" found on this page: https://www.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial/chunkyhtml/a6339.html which clearly says that 255 is treated specially by iptables to mean "any". I think it would be a good thing to add that note to the manual page. Also since there is a name "any", maybe make a clear correlation between both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20170220/2a79bc85/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2019-Jul-16 16:20 UTC
[Bug 1124] manual page does not describe special icmp type of 255
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fw at strlen.de --- Comment #1 from Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> --- (In reply to Alexis Wilke from comment #0)> which clearly says that 255 is treated specially by iptables to mean "any". > > I think it would be a good thing to add that note to the manual page. Also > since there is a name "any", maybe make a clear correlation between both.Not sure why this was implemented, if you want to match all icmp you can use "-p icmp", no need for the icmp match. Am I missing anything? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20190716/62faabf7/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Destination routing and its implementations?
- [Bug 95] New: inverse limit match doesn't work
- [Bug 1221] New: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default route
- [Bug 1354] New: cat foo.nft | nft -f - produces syntax error not seen with nft -f foo.nft
- [Bug 1237] New: sets: timeout > 24d20h31m23s becomes 49d17h2m47s