similar to: small netwok traffic shaping

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there interest in ipp2p support in Shorewall? While the ipp2p code is not part of the standard kernel.org distributions, my experience is that it is very easy to install and I would be willing to provide support for it if there is interest. See http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html for information about ipp2p. - -Tom - -- Tom

Greetings, I''ve searched, found ftwall, and some other commercial solutions, but am wondering if anyone on this list has any solutions using a linux firewall to block p2p traffic, more specifically Kazaa. Walter Wickersham _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Interesante !! lo probaste con 2.4 ? o 2.6 ? -> -----Mensaje original----- -> De: Esteban Ribicic [mailto:esteban@dejawu.com.ar] -> Enviado el: Lunes, 02 de Febrero de 2004 08:11 p.m. -> Para: ''ThE PhP_KiD'' -> Asunto: RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p -> -> -> Probaste layering 7 matching? -> -> -> -----Mensaje original----- -> De:

On the ipp2p web site, on the download section (http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html) there is no kernel patch for ipp2p 0.5c or for ipp2p 0.6. Just the source for the iptables module. Is there something missing ? Do I not have to patch the kernel for 0.5c or 0.6 ? jnk _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hello people, This the first time i post in list. I read the lartc how-to and decided that IMQ with HTB was the solution to solve my problem. The ingress shaping i want is simple, shape the traffic to my ftp-server, i just want to give 8kbps to each client because they only upload to my ftp-server, and i dont want to any class borrowing, each client only send(upload) at 8kbps, not above this

I do not how to use match string to deny kazaa traffic, if I put the word kazaa only http content is deny but the kazaa aplication is running, are there special commands to match string? thanks _________________________________________________________________ Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.microsoft.com/es

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901

I had been using L7-Filter[1] successfully for edonkey/eMule traffic until recently. I upgraded to the latest release of mldonkey, 2.5.28a, which implements eMule compatibility, and with support for Kademlia[2] enabled, network latency increases greatly. [1] http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://www.infoanarchy.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Kademlia Has anyone created a new pattern match for

Dear Friends, I compiled with secessfull module P2P to iptables on CENTOS 4.2, but after the Centos load ipt_p2p.ko the kernel PANIC. Below I show follow steps for compile. # tar -zxpvf iptables-p2p-0.3.0a.tar.gz # rpm -ivh iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4.scr.rpm # cp -a /usr/src/iptables/include/* /usr/include # cp /usr/src/iptables-p2p-0.3.0a/common/* /usr/include Before compilation I had to

Dear All, I'm reading the following pages: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/TaskRoutedNetworkSetupVirtManager http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/TaskNATSetupVirtManager http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/TaskIsolatedNetworkSetupVirtManager routed mode, NAT mode and Isolated mode, But above pages explain with GUI, a sysadmin forgets GUI... Question is What's replacement of above command? ---Best

I have a problem with a mismatch between RSpec Rails and the actual behavior when using GetText, and would be glad for suggestions how to best solve this. When using GetText a failure is reported for the following simplified specification: describe SamplesController, "when requesting /samples" do it "should render index " do get ''index''

Hi all, I want to modify a large number of text files (ca 4000) by replacing a value found on a particular line in them with a value from an R object. For a single file I would normally use: con<-file ("foo.txt", open="r+") content<-readLines(con) content[n]<-"test" writeLines(content,con) close(con) For repeating this for several files I can

Hello, I need some help with this problem that i have. I want to accept connection from 1 ip address to my linux box, but i cannot telnet the port 139. I added the rule in rules: ACCEPT net:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx fw tcp 139 but still i cannot see this port from outside. >From inside the netowork everything is ok. Can someone tell me what i am doing worng? or what i need to do to be able to

Hi list, I made an open source CMS powered by Rails, named Rubricks. I have a web page for Rubricks. You can download it or view a flash demo there. Please try them and feed me back, like bug report etc. Check it out at: http://rubricks.org/index_en.html Thanks. Shouta

Dear useRs, I recently began a job at a very large and heavily bureaucratic organization. We're setting up a research office and statistical analysis will form the backbone of our work. We'll be working with large datasets such the SIPP as well as our own administrative data. Due to the bureaucracy, it will take some time to get the licenses for proprietary software like Stata. Right

Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to 384k because I told it so.I guess, since wshaper takes only one card as argument, I can''t

Hello, i use doevecot 2.2.18 current. My Problem is with email-extension and case sensitiv folders. Example: user+extenstion will be delivered to the user and subfolder extenstion so this is okay. but user+extenstion will not be delivert to the user and exiting subfolder Extenstion so that is not okay. The mail will be also delivered in the subfolder extension. The exiting Folder Extension will

Hello there, I''m having lots of problems with my setup here. Let me explain: I am network administrator for my university dorm. We are about 300 users, and we have 2 ADSL connections doing load balancing with 300kbits upstream and 2Mbit downstream. The load balancing is working great, we are doing connection tracking so I can mark and hence prioritize interactive traffic and ACKS

Am 30.07.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Jost Krieger: > On Wed Jul 29 22:42:32 2015, Sascha wrote: > >> i use doevecot 2.2.18 current. My Problem is with email-extension and >> case sensitiv folders. >> >> Example: >> user+extenstion will be delivered to the user and subfolder extenstion >> so this is okay. >> but user+extenstion will not be delivert to the