similar to: Shaping Device Aliases

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

Hi all Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet interfaces in my Linux box. Thansk in advanced -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I wanna do some shaping on a DSL line that is plugged to the eth1 nic. Should I attach the qdiscs directly to the ppp device or can I use the eth1 device instead? What (and why) makes more sense? thx cb _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello again, I may have a common problem to solve but it seems it is harder than I thought... I have 2 internet providers (each one having a different gateway). Behind the router there are around 100 clients that are SNAT-ed. I want some clients to be SNAT-ed to the first provider, while the others to the second one. The following lines should work: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

Hello, I connected the network 192.168.1.0 with 192.168.2.0 over the internet trough a GRE-Tunnel. I don''t know if I set up all things right: The client-pcs in both networks have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.2.x''s default gateway is the server wich has started the tunnel. The 192.168.1.x''s default gateway is 192.168.1.250 wich routes traffic destinated to

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

Hi, i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing problem (?). eth0: external interface eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. Services like DNS, HTTP is configured to run using eth1 ip address. The problem is when i try to connect from internet to firewall, i can´t see eth1 ip address... only eth0 ip address. So, when i try to connect to web

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hi, I''ve modified my copy of the wondershaper script to add a few filters that allow traffic to and from a few specific ips go through with a speed of up to 100Mbits... I increased the root from 10 to 100mbit, and added this bit of code a bit further down the script; # Real time hosts for i in 62.101.244.63/32 216.74.158.11/32 216.74.158.3/32 216.74.158.57/32; do tc filter add dev

Hullo :) I appear to be having a common problem, but the standard fix hasn''t worked for me :/ I''m using a 2.4.23 kernel, with QoS options thusly: # QoS and/or fair queueing # CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y # CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ is not set CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=m # CONFIG_NET_SCH_CSZ is not set CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=m

Two easy questions after having read the LARTC HOWTO document (which by the way is a *fantastic* document. Congratulations to all who contributed!) First is: Can I prioritise my "drops" on incoming traffic when the link is overloaded. ie instead of just tail dropping, can I "prefer" to drop certain classes of traffic? If so, do I do this by setting up, say, a HTB tree

I`m trying to shape both upload (eth0) and download(eth1). I made this script to acomplishthis but the filters are not working even though the classes and qdiscs are created. What am I doing wrong? #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc class add dev

Hi, I am new to this group. I use this script tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit ceil 500kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 300Kbit ceil 500kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 200kbit ceil 500kbit I like to know: If two customers of the same class (for example 1:2) work