similar to: Fwd: Re: IPP2P: Simular project l7-filter.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/l7-filter/ Providse and posibly replaces your project. Thay use regex(in kernel space) to filter packets in much the same way you do. How ever regex is not going into the kernel! Here is a mail that describes the situation. http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2004/02/msg00051.html Hopefully the l7 ppl will FINALY get a copy, now that I know thay

I had been using L7-Filter[1] successfully for edonkey/eMule traffic until recently. I upgraded to the latest release of mldonkey, 2.5.28a, which implements eMule compatibility, and with support for Kademlia[2] enabled, network latency increases greatly. [1] http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://www.infoanarchy.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Kademlia Has anyone created a new pattern match for

Hi! How I can use L7-Filter (http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/) with Shorewall? Thank you very much! Bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Hi, some minutes ago IPP2P 0.7 has been released. It offers a couple of new features including: -UDP filtering support for some P2P networks -improved SoulSeek filter -Ares/AresLite matching support -debug option to print matchinfo into kernel log Please consult the README and documentation found at http://www.ipp2p.org for information about changes and new features. You can download the source

Subject almost says it all, I wonder if there is a way for me to use iptables matches like l7 and/or ipp2p match in a bridge ( one ethernet in and one ethernet out ) ? Regards.

... Not so long time ago there was a mail about distros. I made packages of ipp2p and l7-filter for ALT Linux Sisyphus repository -- so, now there is one more PC-oriented distro with both these tools. ... About ncsh: * new docs: http://www.radlinux.org/docs/static/en/ncsh_usecases.html (not proofreaded yet, I''ll send it to Mohan with next mail) * new capability: l7-filter frontend

Hi, can anybody comment on the cost of matching with IPP2P vs. Layer7. Also, does a iptables rule with more complicated matching mechanism also slow down processing if all the packets are matched before they reach the rule. I.e. is the mere existence of a potentially costly rule already slowing down processing or only if packets are actually processed by it? Thanks very much in advance.

Hello, Just a word to let you know that I have improved -l7 high compression quality setting, thanks to a new processing and I have also corrected an error in the residual coding.Now it has more neatness/definition.Files size is also a little smaller (and please keep in mind that the entropy coding schemes are not optimal for now, so we can save 1.5Ko-2Ko per .nhw file). Actually I find -l7

Hey guys, Here''s an easy one. Is it possible to use the l7-filter extension on a box that performs NAT? The HOWTO says the filter only works 100% of the time if it can see both sides of the connection. I tried putting the l7 MARK rules in the POSTROUTING chain on a box that does NAT and it does successfully mark some packets. I''m not 100% sure if it''s working, or if

Hi All Is it possible to add the l7 patch http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ to the Xen Kernel Tree. I want to make sure this will not cause any problems with the system. I also wonder if http://www.linuximq.net/ kernel patch is also compatible. If someone can advise this it will be great Thanks Sassy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi All Is it possible to add the l7 patch http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ to the Xen Kernel Tree. I want to make sure this will not cause any problems with the system. I also wonder if http://www.linuximq.net/ kernel patch is also compatible. If someone can advise this it will be great Thanks Sassy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi, those who are interested in l7-filter on C4.4, here is the testing repo. http://homen.vsb.cz/~hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/RPMS/repodata/ Kernels and iptables RPMS are compiled with l7-filter. Feel free to test and send the reports. Packages are not signed, not even with special release version. Should be fixed on final release. New release should also include IMQ, ESFQ. Iproute is the only

Hello, loading conntrack resolve my problem ... layer 7 have got a dependency with conntrack but doesn''t load it automaticaly... so module is loaded but no packets match with l7-protocols ... reported as a bug http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1596065&group_id=80085&atid=558668 regards ArcosCom Linux User a écrit : > With: >

Hi all. I remember someone in here was at least affiliated with the above mentioned ipp2p-project (an extension to iptables that allows to match peer-to-peer traffic). About two weeks ago I tried to contact the author of this extension via the address that is mentioned on the project website, since I wanted to send in a patch, but with no success. At least I didn''t receive a reply.

Hello every one! I''m making a project to a discipline in the university and the project is make a Linux router that grants QoS to Multimedia connections (the prof. say we can use Open Source Soft. :) or reinvent the wheel). I have been googeling and googeling and i found the l7-filter in source forge and the spectacular simple language that is TCNG. Well the problem is how can i

Hello, Is there a way to route p2p traffic on a separate ISP connection, just as you would choose a separate connection for http traffic? I tried all sorts of setups based on: http://www.braindump.dk/en/wiki/?wikipage=PolicyRouting but with no luck. Please help :) (ipp2p is up and running) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hello, I guess a few of you know about the iptables-p2p project at the http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptables-p2p site. This suite has an excellent filter of which I use today and its running very smoothly. The main reason why I use this is because I desperately need to block torrents. IPP2P does not do this at this time (it seems to me in the doc at least). Is it maybe some way we could merge

The shorewall work with l7-filter? _____________________________________________________ Keny Hayakawa Schmeling Diretor Comercial/Administravivo Tel: 5566-1465 Fax: 5566-6541 http://www.optinfo.com.br kenyhs@optinfo.com.br _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/

Hello all, Just a quick message to let you know that I have added to the NHW Project a -l7 high compression quality setting. This setting is still experimental and can be improved, but actually (I am certainly not objective) I find it competitive with x265 (HEVC), mainly because it has a good neatness. Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ You can also find sample 512x512 test bitmap images

Hello all, Just a quick message to let you know that I have improved -l6 and -l7 high compression settings. These settings are notably better now, with more neatness and more precision.I find them competitive with x265 (HEVC) now!!! Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ Else I realize that the strength of the NHW Project is that it is royalty-free, and competitive with the great x265 codec