similar to: QOS Script difficulty on bridge

Hi I''m newbie on this and i would appreciate some pointers on how to limit the http trafic to my users from my linux-gateway box. Thanx in advance -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi sombody know what is happen with Jim diGriz''s QoS Script Web Page ? www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script Regards _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi all, I found in http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/index.html#sources the precompiled iptables shared libs for 1.2.6 & 1.2.5, but my version is 1.2.9 (in Debian Sid) and I don''t know how to patch the .deb file. I need the -j IMQ target... ¿What can I do? Thanks!

Hi Guys, Using the 2.6.test kernel? Alex and I have done some more tests and this is the patch incase ur using jdg-qos script http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/index.html#qos-2.6 Thanks K _________________________________________________________________ Winterize your home with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Hello, I''m wondering which of these filters is the best method for filtering ACK packages to achieve lowest delay possible on a dsl-link. This one ist from the wondershaper from the lartc-site: /sbin/tc filter add dev $EXTIF parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 0 u32 \   match ip protocol 6 0xff \   match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \   match u16 0x0000 0xffc0 at 2 \   flowid 1:10 Thats a suggestion

Hi I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C Subnet with 512 IP-Addresses. 60% of the machines are Windows. The rest are SUN and Linux. At the moment Windows viruses and p2p-traffic eats most of our bandwidth. My Aims are:

Hello all, I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading posts on IMQ and it''s apparent stability / instability. I have seen a number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to me about IMQ''s stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps) and what was causing IMQ to fail if you know. Thanks, Mike

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is

Hi, I have typical situation, local LAN with private addresses, translated via NAT to internet. I need to shape ingress traffic (from internet to local LAN) in several HTB queues accorting to destination (private not public) IP. So I need mark packets to divide them to corresponding queue. According to http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/kptd/ I thing I have only one way how to do it, because

Hi, I can''t get traffic shaping working. This is my situation: -------- ------ Net1 ----- |router| -------------------- | TC | ----------- Net2 -------- leased line ------ eth1 eth0 We use the leased line for normal traffic but also for synchronisation between 2 servers. The leased line is 2mbit. The synchronisation

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hello, Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ, are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on scheduler in Linux enviroment: Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc in a router, we know, if there is packet which want to enqueue the packet, the Function red_enqueue is called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the Function red_dequeue

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

Hello, Has anyone had any luck compiling Alexander''s QOS script on a vanilla FC3 or FC2 box? I just cant seem to get the darn thing to port right. Regards, Bryan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

ok i gave up. can sb point me docs on how design proper qos rules ? about differences between them and the usage (which for wifi, which for ISPs which for homenet) ill read and do it -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl |

Hi I share my bandwith (adsl 512/128) between 12 users. I set up simple qos script for incoming (IMQ) and outgoing traffic using htb in root, 4 classess and esfq qdisc at leafs. Interactive traffic goeas to class1 , http,mail etc. to class2, p2p, ftp to class3, and rest to class4. Classess divide link in proportion 20% (prio 1), 40% (prio 2), 20% (prio 3) ,20% (prio 4) This works

Does anyone have any pointers on how other people have implemented tcp window adjustment to do bandwidth shaping? Granted the basic idea is to set the window size to be RTT * bandwidth, but a quick squiz at google turns up mostly papers on how to implement this at the sender end with a view to some new magic TCP implementation. I''m really interested in notes on how to implement at

Greetings list folk.. I have been reading up on QOS for a short time now with the idea of solving one problem I have but I cant seem to piece together a working system to do so. I have a linux box acting as a home gateway system running Gentoo and vanilla 2.4.26. I have a vonage uhh voip device that is connected behind the router. There are only 3-4 other hosts on the network. All I really

Hi guys, I run an internet cafe with 40 odd computers in it and would like some sugestions on sharing the data evenly for udp and tcp data. Currently i have all tcp data put into a class thats half our link speed and udp data doesnt get class''d at all. which works well but also means that the line doesnt get shared in terms of bandwidth evenly. What i would like tho is to setup a