similar to: Trafic monitor

Hi all... How do i set U32 to filter a port range, instead of a single port? In normal use: source port 80 we use: "... match ip sport 80 0xffff ..." - I know that is something about the 0xffff parameter.... I need to filter ports 1 ~ 1024 to a higher priority class... i tried with IPTABLES MARK and TC FW, but it''s not working.... (...) # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi ! I have an error in this script as it is not working and I can''t figure out what that is. Anyone can help? Thanks! #!/bin/bash ### unitati de masura pt debit # kbps - kilobytes per second # mbps - megabytes per second # kbit - kilbits per second # mbit - megabits per second EXT_IF="eth0" INT_IF="eth1" TC=/sbin/tc IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables # RATE

>Dear Speex developers >I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 >I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one >frame >Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? >Best Regards >Zohar fox I have an own optimisation for Speex for different versions of ARM architecture. Here is Measurements of performance for STM32 72 MHz. 4000

I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories. For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis

Looks good to me. Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Hi > > Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only > change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, > as requested by Ivo. > > Many thanks for your input. > > I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group > > > /alfred > > Ivo

I am completely new to this.. I am trying to make simple traffic control.. I have read quite some manuals and posts that i found, but i don''t understand much, i think.. My situation is: i have linux server which i am using for firewall for local network.. also on same linux server i have torrentflux for downloading torrents.. What i want to do is to give priority to local clients(2-3

I had expected that the default bitrate for the encoder would be the same as setting it to OPUS_AUTO, but I'm getting difference results: >opusenc --comp 4 sample.wav sample.opus Encoding using libopus 1.3-rc2 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 8 kHz, 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 25 kbit/s VBR Preskip: 312

Hi all, I''ve got a BOX running CentOS 4.5. It acts as a firewall + router. I have installed both iptables and iproute2. I has 3 network cards. eth0 is connected to Internet (is has an internet ip. pls assume its ip is 1.2.3.4/29). it is a 256 Kbit link. eth1 is DMZ. its ip is 192.168.100.254 eth2 is LAN. Its ip is 192.168.101.254 I have alreday shaped traffic to 64 Kbit on eth1 for

Hello to all speex developers, I have question regarding payload length of narrowband speex in RTP. I were watching tcpdump of the xlite softphone and have found that it uses weird payload length namely 75 Bytes I went through various source and without success. To be clear: For 8000Hz sample in 20 ms that is 160 samples per frame. This makes 50 frames per sec. modes bit-rate 8 kbit/s

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

hi all i want to first apollogiaze if my message will annoy you(my guess is because it will be quite large:)) i have the following situation on my hands i was recently faced with the problem of traffic shaping/bandwith limiting. my setup is(very common i guess) -internet comming in(going out) through eth0 -internet is being "shared" with the private local network via eth1. i

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

OK - this is starting to get frustrating... Are there any known issues with 2.6.9 and traffic shaping? I am using 2.6.9 with geoip 20041115, and get odd oopses. The following script oopses my box: ----------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh -x IFOUT=''eth1'' IFIN=''eth0'' TC=''/sbin/tc''

Hi, all I''ve got problems with tc qdisc ingress. I''m using vanillia kernel 2.6.14.4 patched with http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.14-12.diff, and iproute2-2.6.14-051107. i am using ingress to limit incoming traffic : (DEV is eth1 / DOWNLINK is 7700) # attach ingress policer: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # filter *everything* to it (0.0.0.0/0), drop everything

Hello, I''m a total tc newbie, and I''m trying to tweak the wondershaper script (http://lartc.org/wondershaper/) to get a slightly different result. Excuse me if I will not use the correct technical terms, it''s a whole new world to me :) wondershaper.htb creates 3 HTB classes; 1:10 is high prio, 1:20 is bulk (default), and 1:30 is low priority. The classes are

If I understand correctly, Ogg Vorbis is a lossless format. But then why does it support bitrates? Ogg Vorbis does not delete any information. When I encode a 128 kbit MP3 file to 32 kbit OggVorbis, the resulting file has a bitrate of about 110 kbit. And when I encode it to 320 kbit, the file will be bigger, but the quality won't improve because of the quality of the original. So what purpose

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

I am currently using the ultimate-tc script from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.ultimate-tc.html and I want to make sure that internet radio packets (mp3 streaming audio) will always get through no matter what. I have added some iptables commands like this: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 8000 -j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --sport 8000 -j