similar to: SFQ with Per Flow Caps

I think that there are no qdiscs that permit to drop the oldest frame of a queue when this queue is full, but I would like to be wrong: bfifo drops arriving frames when the max queue length is reached. red also drops arriving frames in a more elaborate fashion, with a drop probability that increases above a limit and becomes a drop certitude when the max queue length is reached. sfq drops

Hi, When installing packages in Windows (currently using Windows 10 with all service packs), occasionally, I get a warning similar to the following: package 'Rcpp' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked Warning in install.packages : unable to move temporary installation 'C:\Users\William Denney\Documents\R\win-library\3.4\file32701900456\Rcpp' to

Hello Tom, I recieve the answer on my question from Patrick McHardy which discuss ''cls_flow'' module on ''http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/search/@subject+%22%5BNET_SCHED+00/04%5D:+External+SFQ+classifiers/flow+classifier%22/linux-netdev''. May be his answer help you to understand as we can use this module. Regards, Alex

On Windows, if you load a dll, this is locked. Hence, for package installations, close all R instances, start one without loading packages and then update packages. Best, Uwe Ligges On 26.08.2017 15:18, Bill Denney wrote: > Hi, > > > > When installing packages in Windows (currently using Windows 10 with all > service packs), occasionally, I get a warning similar to the

I think that this response should be added to R for Windows FAQ 3.5. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On August 26, 2017 11:45:55 PM PDT, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: >On Windows, if you load a dll, this is locked. >Hence, for package installations, close all R instances, start one >without loading packages and then update packages. >

Well, things seem to be going really well with tbf, prio and sfq. But I''m a nosey bugger. :-) I''d love to be able to audit what''s going through each of the prio bands. The super ideal solution would be to be able to attach tcpdump to each band and see what''s going through it with the benefit of tcpdump''s filtering so that I can examine and filter

Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- I haven't pushed these changes to renouveau.xml yet, I'll do it soon if you guys are OK with this. nouveau/nouveau_class.h | 1036 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 518 insertions(+), 518 deletions(-) diff --git a/nouveau/nouveau_class.h b/nouveau/nouveau_class.h index c5fe5d7..87e167b

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:10 rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:11 rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:12 rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src 172.16.11.2 flowid 1:10 i login

Hello, First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing my problems here now... I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a

I''m grappling with a problem that looks like sfq is not working (packets don''t get fairly queued, they appear to be always sent FIFO). My configuration appears to be correct. The machine is running quite an old kernel and if I could convince myself that the sfq code it has is just broken, I''d spend the time to upgrade it. Is there any way to inspect or dump the sfq hash

Anyone notices that using sfq qdisc adds latency compared to pfifo? With "sfq perturb 10" ping latency is around 100-120ms, while with "pfifo limit 3" drops to ~10-30ms (qdiscs belong to htb class). I''m missing something or is this expected? { $TC_CLASS parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb prio 0 rate 900kbit ceil 1000kbit burst 7k $TC_QDISC parent 1:20 handle 200: {pfifo

> > SFQ is very useful as a leaf qdisc. But by default, its internal queue > > length is 128 which is too much for small classes or even for > > not-so-fast links. Changing SFQ_DEPTH in net/sched/ sch_sfq.c to about > > 10-20 results in flows responding much faster to bandwidth changes. I''m not sure I understand what problem is being described, but I suspect

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Can I use the same SFQ queue dicipline for all the classe in a CBQ or HBT system?

Hello, Why linux users use SFQ as leaf queueing discipline instead of RED and other? -- Best Regards, S.Mehdi Sheikhalishahi, Bye.

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

Can I attach a SFQ qdisc after a TBF qdisc?

Hello all, I have a few question regarding PRIO and what it is. Is it used to prioritize what classes get what? I read the how to but it isn''t exactly clear. Also about SFQ. Does this disciplines keep traffic within a queue fair? for example if I classify all http connections to 1:10 and I have packets in the queue and another person is also sending packets to the queue.

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:35 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Jody: I don''t know if you answer basic HTB questions but I''l try anyway. I''m implementing AF and EF with a

http://ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages I finished some more manpages, and improved others. New are tc-tbf.8, tc-sfq.8, tc-prio.8 and tc-red.8. Please check & use them. http://ds9a.nl/lartc/manpages -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl -