similar to: IMQ stability

Hi Guys, Here is our patch to allow broadcast packets over a GRE tunnel. Hopefully it might be accepted into the source someday. You need to enabled bridging and GRE tunnels in your kernel. No other options are required. The gre patch determines what type of protocol type to put in the GRE header based on the whether the packet is forwarded from a bridge or not. To use the patch: # Create

[I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 This is effective but is there any way to

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

Hi Guys, I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9 and I want to know is this procedure is correct: ---------------------------------------- - In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux) # cd /usr/src/linux # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff # patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff - In Patch O Matic Directory

Two easy questions after having read the LARTC HOWTO document (which by the way is a *fantastic* document. Congratulations to all who contributed!) First is: Can I prioritise my "drops" on incoming traffic when the link is overloaded. ie instead of just tail dropping, can I "prefer" to drop certain classes of traffic? If so, do I do this by setting up, say, a HTB tree

I''ve followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a couple of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was his name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in my test environment. I now need to implement it in my production environment. My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection to the

Hello again, I may have a common problem to solve but it seems it is harder than I thought... I have 2 internet providers (each one having a different gateway). Behind the router there are around 100 clients that are SNAT-ed. I want some clients to be SNAT-ed to the first provider, while the others to the second one. The following lines should work: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as it was in previous relases. Are there

Hello, I connected the network 192.168.1.0 with 192.168.2.0 over the internet trough a GRE-Tunnel. I don''t know if I set up all things right: The client-pcs in both networks have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.2.x''s default gateway is the server wich has started the tunnel. The 192.168.1.x''s default gateway is 192.168.1.250 wich routes traffic destinated to

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

Hi all Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet interfaces in my Linux box. Thansk in advanced -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hello all, I´ve read http://lartc.org/howto/ and now i am just confused, i think my skills with linux are not very good, so asking for help. I have a linux box with two ethernets cards eth0(gateway 1mb) with is the host for some sites and emails and eth1(nat interface) with provide internet acess to other 5 pcs. I would like to limit the bandwith 512 k for the eth0 and 512 k for eth1 however

Hi, i have one firewall/gateway server with two interfaces and a routing problem (?). eth0: external interface eth1: internal interface. Both ip address are valid. Services like DNS, HTTP is configured to run using eth1 ip address. The problem is when i try to connect from internet to firewall, i can´t see eth1 ip address... only eth0 ip address. So, when i try to connect to web

Hi, I just installed wondershapper 1.1a on my ipcop firewall box. I have roadrunner cable with a ftp server setup. My download speed is 2mbit (I get 225 KBytes) and my upload is 384kbit (I send at 43 KBytes). What should the settings in wshaper? I can ping yahoo.com at 90msec with little traffic.....and at around 220msec with full upload traffic. Mark

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

Hi, I''ve modified my copy of the wondershaper script to add a few filters that allow traffic to and from a few specific ips go through with a speed of up to 100Mbits... I increased the root from 10 to 100mbit, and added this bit of code a bit further down the script; # Real time hosts for i in 62.101.244.63/32 216.74.158.11/32 216.74.158.3/32 216.74.158.57/32; do tc filter add dev