similar to: HTB_Multiple_Interface_Query

Hi, my program works well with fedora-2 .with fedora-5 it's gives following errors.. get_it_i_say.c:549: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp' cc -o giis dir.o file.o get_it_i_say.o group.o init.o inode.o main.o searchnupdate.o uninit.o inode.o: In function `read_inode':inode.c:(.text+0x202): undefined reference to `S_ISDIR' inode.o: In function

Hi Stef, Reffering to page < http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/7.html > I found a para as follows, " CBQ is not always as accurate as it should be. See docum.org on the test page for some tests with bounded classes. The algorithm used by cbq is very "link sensitive". It calculates the link idle time and for that it needs the real link bandwidth, average

I wan to share internet to these 12 PCs. But my traffic control is not working. I''m using IP Masquerading to route internet to the LAN eth0 - LAN interface eth1 - Internet interface this is my firs htb script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root handle 1: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 25kbps ceil 48kbps #tc

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :

Hi all i have installed the FEDORA and i saw the fedora ships with latest IP and TC and HTB too when i add the with TC Script with HTB iam getting that HTB version. HTB init, kernel part version 3.12 and iam comparing with my old version which is installed and patched with TC 3.6 patch that is on RH 9.0 with TC and HTB patch shows HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 so which one is latest ,

I was using this setup and it worked fine untill i executed up2date in Redhat and updated a lot of the packages in linux. When i run the following script i get an error, which i pasted bellow. Script i run: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 171.100.20.110 -j MARK --set-mark 28 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 171.100.20.96/27 -d 171.100.20.110 -j MARK --set-mark 29

Hi I have tested with FC3 but iam not able get any good results on that. in the list some one recomend me that > 3.17 HTB should work I saw latest FC4 test2 has the HTB 3.17 with iptables 1.3.0 i have install in my P4 box, and trying to test when iam uploading its working perfect, but when iam downloading its going to default class can some one experinced the same problem below is the my

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

Hi, I''m trying to make a shaper / firewall to improve sharing of bandwidth on a ADSL (3mbit down / ½ mbit up) Since the ADSL is very asymmetric, down is unimportant, I make a ingress rate limit shaper to ensure, all shaping is at the Shaper, and not on the Router or the ISP. The Idea is then to make one HTB hierarchy and have each client (IP) filtererd and put in a child-HTB queue.

Hello all, I am testing CBQ and HTB these days and I got a lots problem which needs your help. It is a little long text :) Thank you! (All my test is based on Redhat Linux9.0) 1.Is isolated of CBQ working? I have read Mr. stef word that he never made cbq isolated work. 2. I have setup an environment to test cbq: one tcp flow which I should protect and a noisy udp flow who will eat much of the

My hardware is a Linksys AP with MIPS 300MHz and Linux kernel 2.4.20. The traffics are from two LAN switch ports to WAN port. And the traffics are generate at a rate of 80Mbit. So the total traffic to WAN port is 160Mbit. The shaping works well that the traffic to WAN port is about 50/30Mbit according to configuration. But the priority seems strange when the root rate is 50Mbit. When the root

I forward this to the list also, I attached SFQ leaf to parent class, and add QUANTUM value and PERTURB value. It worked! i tried 20hosts borrowing from the same parent, no problem. Each host get its own allocated bandwidth. Btw about last email sent to this list asking about QoS, i ve read LARTC document but i cant find the solution matches my case. Need help.. I have 100Kbit allocated to

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

Hello Stef, I am working on a Bandwidth management project as part of my college curriculum.I am running TCNG 10-b but I am not able to classify packets based on MAC address using tcng, so I am running tc commands in /tcng/bin and they are working. But is there a way out to classify packets based on MAC address using TCNG. And, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

I used Stef Coene''s snmp.pl. #./tc.sh #./get_snmp.pl #./snmp.pl #tc -s class ls dev eth0 class htb 20:1 root rate 80Mbit ceil 80Mbit burst 106440b cburst 106440b Sent 674762 bytes 5660 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 3bps lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 8313 ctokens: 8313 class htb 20:10 parent 20:1 rate 40Mbit ceil 80Mbit burst 54017b cburst 106440b Sent 670753

hi stef oone more pb while shaping incoming traffic with imq .this one tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: pfifo tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent

Hi iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc iam trying to access the stef scripts but its site is totally broken could some one point me where i can graph using good docs hare

hareram wrote: > Hi > > iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc > iam trying to access the stef scripts > but its site is totally broken > > could some one point me where i can graph using good docs > > hare > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from