similar to: new to rails, quick (hopefully simple) question

On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? > Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

Hi, The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change include : - Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP with the current bridge and vlan code. - Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged vlan can

Using K-9 Mail to IDLE on a test folder "MyIncTmp". When there is a flag change on a message in the folder, which generates an untagged FETCH, K-9 Mail responds with a DONE, but dovecot does not exit IDLE state (LOG 1). However, if a new message is delivered, generating an untagged EXISTS, K-9 Mail responds the same way, with a DONE, and dovecot does exit IDLE state. (LOG 2) You

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

> > note: these bits are not really reserved for os or processor > specific use in ELF. in practice they are processor specific > so it will be STO_AARCH64_TAGGED. > Correct. note2: undefined symbol references will need correct marking > too if objects may get copy relocated into the main exe and > linkers should check if definitions match references. Yep - at this point I

Am 27.08.24 um 11:55 schrieb peter dalgaard: > Yes. A quirk, rather than a bug I'd say. One issue is that the internal logic of transform() relies on > > e <- eval(substitute(list(...)), `_data`, parent.frame()) > tags <- names(e) > > so untagged entries in ... will not be included. ... unless at least one is tagged: R> transform(BOD, 0:5, 1:6) Time

Hi everyone, I believe the ABI for exception unwinding on a stack tagged with MTE needs to be clarified -- hopefully we can start the discussion here? (Please feel free to add people to the thread that you think would be interested). I'll outline some possible approaches that I think seem good below, I know Evgenii and Peter have done a lot of investigation in this area for HWASAN, so

I''m using Restful Authentication, and the code to create a user is pretty straight forward - there is a before_save action and a before_create action: before_save :encrypt_password before_create :make_activation_code But for some reason when I try to create a user programmatically in the controller like this: User.new(:email =>

Hello, a bit of a problem with Dovecot. Version is 1.0.15 and is a default install (no changes to config) from FC8 repository... except that Dovecot is configured to use Maildir I have a user on the system who uses the tags in Thunderbird (Important, Personal etc). When she tags the messages they cannot be deleted and their tags cannot be changed. When deleting a message from the IMAP inbox

Setup as follows: class Resource < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user validates_presence_of :filename validates_uniqueness_of :filename, :scope => "user_id", :message => "already exists, try uploading another file or deleting first." acts_as_taggable :join_class_name => ''TagResource''

Hello. I''m trying to use vlan in domU, but have something strange: I created bridge on eth0. This interface was configured as trunk with vlan 300, 301. I use this bridge in my domU, and I can see tagged packets when run tcpdump in domU. Also I created interface on domU to work with vlan 300. On this interface I see untagged packets in vlan300. And everything looks fine. But when

I''m trying to implement simple untagged vlans on our switch and have misconfigured something.. ISP gw is on the default vlan1 (untagged) Router eth1 is setup on the switch with default vlan1 and member of vlan4. eth0 is default vlan4 which connects to the clients that are all default members of vlan4 eth0 is x.x.x.86/28 This is what clients are connecting to as their gw.. (no

Hi, I have a model called Stock with a value called "strength." I wrote a simple method in the Stock.rb model file to update the value of "strength" for each record in the stocks table. I created a controller called fix_controller.rb. I don''t have access to the live system, so the idea is that an admin will go to http://url/fix and a script will run to check and

Does substitute(...()) do what you want? > myFunc <- function(x, ...) substitute(...()) > myFunc(y=1/(1:10), x=sin(3:1), z=stop("Oops"), "untagged arg") $y 1/(1:10) $z stop("Oops") [[3]] [1] "untagged arg" > names(.Last.value) [1] "y" "z" "" Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at

Hi there, I''m puzzled by this apparently simple query I can''t manage to reassemble using ez_where plugin. cond = Caboose::EZ::Condition.new :my_table do start_on < Time.now any {end_on > Time.now; end_on.nil?} end I keep getting the following result : >> cond.to_sql => ["my_table.start_on < ? AND (my_table.end_on > ?)", Tue May 23

Just curious, if I have my Polycom IP 550 phone VLAN tag 30, will the packets I send from my PC(on the PC port of the phone) have the same VLAN tag? THe PC is sending untagged packets. This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and

So, under Sqlite2, if I want to update a database''s schema, I have to dump the DB, modify the table''s structure, then go and modify EVERY insert statement. The insert statements look like (from memory): INSERT INTO my_table VALUES (''some_id'', ''some_val'', '''', '''', '''', ''some_other

Can I use validates_presence_of somehow if I want to check that at least one of 2 fields is not empty? Thanks, Dmitry -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Any recommendations on an economical layer 3 switch? Preferably something that you have hands on experience with connecting to IP phones with attached PCs? Specifically I need the ability to set the VLAN in the phone to tag voice packets and to set a native VLAN on a per port basis on the switch to put the untagged packets from the attached PC into a separate VLAN. POE is not a requirement