similar to: Setting up dual WAN firewalling bridge

i apologize if this has been asked before, but things are too busy to preclude a full search of the list. i have both cable and dsl from the local providers here. due to wiring issues here, i''ve been forced to put the cable modem in one end of the house and the dsl modem in the other. the cable modem is firewalled off by a cisco pix 501 (192.168.2.12). the dsl modem is firewalled off

Hello, from the Samba3 docs I learnt that Samba currently cannot function as an ADS "secondary" domain controller. Imagine the following setup: At location A of a company, I have a W2K ADS domain controller and a Samba3 machine as an ADS member server. Connectivity is via 2Mbit to the Internet. At location B, which is located in another country and connected to the Internet with a

We have a client that wants to bond 2 DSL circuits instead of getting a T-1 (or similar) at their office to run their VoIP traffic on. We came across this Multihomed Gateway (MH200): http://www.cyberpathinc.com/mh200/details.htm Does anybody think this would work if installed at the client location handling NAT for 10 Cisco 7960's and connecting to our public asterisk server? My concern

I have a setup where I have three NIC in a Debian box. I have eth1 conected to internet and eth0 NAT''ed to 192.168.1.1. eth1 and eth2 are bridged together, given ip 192.168.122.2. What I want to achieve is to perform traffic shaping on the bridge as well as prioritizing the traffic from eth0 very low. (This is from trental flat ...) However it seems that I am unable to perform thhe

My situation: I have a cable modem (COMCAST 6Mbit d/l) and am about to also have DSL (Verizon 3 Mbit d/l). I was thinking of using CentOS (4.4, 4.5, or 5??) as a router/dhcp server/firewall for my home network consisting of 3 to 6 computers at any given time. I seek the wisdom of the members of this list on the following issues: -- Is CENTOS a good direction to go? I do not mind manually

Hi, I have been modifying the Wonder shaper to include another queue. My understanding was packets would be de queued to hardware in the following order: cbq1 -> sfq10 > sfq20 > sfq30. Also we only move onto the next queue when the preceding one is empty. However is seems to be prio xx number that reflects the order packets are de queued not to what flowid they belong to. If I

Hi all I need to use three 512 kbps aDSL internet connections, in a load-sharing, link-failover scenario. Presently I am using Ipcop with a single DSL. Now, I seem to have two options...one..an Edimax quad wan port adsl router, with firewalling and NAT and second install a minimal linux distro for routing...something on the lines of LARTC....and keep NATTING, IDS & Firewalling on the linux

Hi, I am connected to two DSL providers (DSL 1 - 1Mbps downlink/384kbps uplink and DSL 2 - 2Mbps downlink/512kpbs uplink) I would like to only allow ftp, pop3 and http via the DSL 1 and only smtp, ipsec and pptp via DSL 2. How can I do so? Can I use iproute to route these protocols? Below is my ip routing: - # DSL 1 ip route add 2.2.2.208/30 dev eth0 src 2.2.2.210 table 1 ip route add

Hello... We have a NT4 Domain in our mainoffice. Now we have to install servers all over germany. (About 20 locations) The offices are connectet over DSL/VPN. We think about using samba to have a stable and inexpensive solution. Is there a solution to use samba over a wide area network? We have alraedy one standalone samba-domain (domain-logons with machine-accounts) in a small office in

Hi Guys, This is such an annoying issue whenever it comes up. The sender and receive always receive the source public IP no matter what in the IP packets but then SIP packets go out with something like 192.168.0.20. In this instance, a Bell Canada DSL modem is installed and I saw the SPA-2102 register properly but only to fail later on due to sending it's LAN IP to the Asterisk server. So,

Hi List, Does anyone know of a good dual wan router that can handle SIP well and can failover between connections if there is a SIP issue on one of the lines (meaning there still is a connection however there isnt enough bandwith or sip packets arent going thru etc.) ? Thanks. Dovid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

Is tinc able to use multiple gateways for outgoing connections? Or is it restricted to the default gateway? In other words... If I have a branch office with a cable connection and a dsl connection, could it use both in an active/hot-standby fashion?

[1]Si vous n'arrivez pas ? lire correctement ce message cliquez ici [2]Disponis le crdit selon vous [3][email-noel_02.gif] [4][email-noel_03.gif] [5][email-noel_04.gif] [6][email-noel_05.gif] [7][email-noel_06.gif]

I am wondering if someone can examine why my set up does not give me the desired result. What I aim to achieve is to make DNS, ICMP, POP3, HTTP, SSH, SMTP traffic at a higher priority than FTP serving and Kazza traffic. However, when the FTP server is busy servicing FTP traffic, web browsing traffic has dragged to almost unusable. Abstract of my iptables script follows:- # Mark traffic on

Hi everybody, I have a network that only uses terminal services. Look at the diagram. 20 machines running WinXP <-> LinuxFW-1 <-> 1Mbit link dedicated fiber link <–> LinuxFW-2 <–> Terminal Server I’d like to give the maximum priority for bandwidth to terminal services (port 3389). I’ve changed the CBQ script from LARTC site to suite my needs, but every time I

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless

Hello folks, I hope somebody here can help shed light on this peculiar behaviour of smbclient. When we execute: smbclient -L <host> and the host is across a VPN link traversing a WAN (DSL) link we get the following: 1. <host> is Windows 98SE: OK, smbclient completes 2. <host> is Windows XP or Samba 3.x: smbclient is able to retrieve the share list but hangs trying to get

Hello all, I am providing broadband service through DVB circuit. I have 4KB uplink and 32KB downlink. I want to share 32KB downlink bandwidth among 192.168.0.0/24 (20 users in this subnet i.e 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.22)subnet where each user will get 2KB to 6KB bandwidth. And from 4KB uplink bandwidth each users will get only 1KB to 2KB bandwidth.

Is anybody using Asterisk with a dual WAN router (Xincom XC-DPG602, Hawking H2WR54G, Fortinet FortiGate-60, SonicWall etc) ? -- #Joseph