similar to: [Fwd: HTB in 3 levels for shaping on both VLAN and QOS]

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

I first saw this problem when our internetgateway refused to boot its new kernel, it was a 4.7-RELEASE. Then i loaded the old kernel and went home to check if my 4.8-STABLE does likewise. And the answer was yes! Both kernels were GENERIC + these options taken from the dummynet man pages: options DUMMYNET options NMBCLUSTERS options HZ When i boot the machine it suddently

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hello everyone... I have a little trouble and need some help :P How can I check on which interface the packet is going (eth0, eth1; I have two ISP and on eth3 little LAN), using to check it TC and IMQ? (HTB script) I tried to mark packets, but on chain POSTROUTING this does not work... Maybe because packets fall on IMQ before signing. I tried marking it on FORWARD but packets also

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

I first met this problem when our (60 students) internetgateway refused to boot its new kernel, it was a 4.7-RELEASE. Then i loaded the old kernel and went home to check if my 4.8-STABLE does likewise. And the answer was yes! Both kernels were GENERIC + these options taken from the dummynet man pages: options DUMMYNET options NMBCLUSTERS options HZ When i boot the machine

Hi folks, I have three network cards on my Slackware box and eth0 and eth1 are for two Internet connections. They have imq0 and imq1. All traffic shaping works fine. Internal eth2 does no traffic shaping. But recently I have put two OpenVPN tunnels (tun devices) and both work via eth0. So my question is - how to shape the traffic on these tun0 and tun1 devices? Thanks Remus

Hi all, I have a script that allocates an ADSL(1500K/256K) bandwidth to three users. My idea is to allow each user having a guarentee rate, while each one is allowed to burst to the max rate while no one is using the bandwidth. I use imq0 for uplink (for some mobility reason) and imq1 for downlink. Everything works smoothly except for VoIP traffic. There are three VoIP phones attached to a

Hello At first I must tell you that I´m a real newbie with Linux (and english as well...) I´m using 2 vlans and shaping works quite well without vlan Now I want to do load balancing at these vlans. Any vlan should get the same minimum/maximum bandwidth of download and use the bandwidth that isn´t used by the other one at the moment. But with vlan the shaping doesn´t work. Can you please tell me

i''m trying to limit upload and download but something is wrong(it is about NAT) i will post here my "script" maybe someone could tell me what is wrong my kernel(2.6.9) is patch with imq(linuximq.net) and my iptables(1.2.11) also #flush tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc del dev imq0 root tc qdisc del dev imq1 root ifconfig imq0 down

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Thanks, The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child classes if I have 200 clients... Let me explain the problem better I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil) 1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority: 256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible) 256/1024 - HTTP 256/1024 - FTP

Hello I have problem with wrr and more than 1300 classes when i try to add qdisc like: tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:21 handle 1000: wrr dest ip 1512 0 then i have a message like: RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory And some other problem: When I do more than 2048 filters I have message like: Classes: tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:1 classid 1:9 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 2048kbit .. tc

Hi. The configuration script is at the bottom. My configuration looks similar to this: imq0 | 1:1 (12mbit) | 1:2 (10mbit) | 3:0 | 3:1 (256kbit) / \ 3:2 3:3 icmp (rest) both 3:2 and 3:3 have rate 1kbit ceil 256kbit Icmp bucklet have priority 1 (better), "rest" bucklet have prio 2 (worse) I tested the script with heavy download

Hello i''m having some issues trying to match packets using iptables mark, iproute filter and tc filter.- i mean, when i do iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 20 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -o eth1 --dport 25 -j MARK --set-mark 10 $TC qdisc del dev $INET_IFACE root $TC

Hi. I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future? Anyway, for the time being the only option that seems to leave is to fwmark packets differently for each device alias and then shape based on that. Is it possible to set multiple marks on the packets? Alternatively, is it possible to check for a specific

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Hi, Is there any tested good HTB script for traffic shaping available like as that of CBQ available at. http://freshmeat.net/projects/cbq.init I am n new bie and need to work on htb. -- Regards, M Arman _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

here is the situation i am using htb.init with fwmark to do QoS. i have 2 parent classes with RATE=CEIL which then have some leafs each on his own. the first one works fine (it shapes the packets to the specified rate) class htb 1:21 root rate 1Mbit ceil 1Mbit burst 2909b cburst 2909b Sent 631520262 bytes 651550 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 131573bps 141pps lended: 380595 borrowed: 0