similar to: Newbie question

Hi guys Finally , after reading a lot of docs from larc/opalsoft/etc, I decided to start learning some QoS First of all I''m trying to shape only download from a iptables+squid+qos machine for 4 machines at LAN ( eth0) Can anyone help me , cause it is not working properly.. ----------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash # 128Kbps

Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate

Hi to all, i''m following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i''m a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:22 handle 220: pfifo lmit 10 #

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate

hello folks, this is my first post to that list. so I hope I am not completely OT here :-) reading the (excellent!) lartc and then writing my own qos-script I have still some open questions which I will try to formulate now: - "Now we can optionally attach queuing disciplines to the leaf classes. If none is specified the default is pfifo." - I can''t find info about Pfifo.

Hi, I''m work on traffic shaping and I would like to know if it''s possible to mix differents Queueing Disciplines ?? I would like to combine the proporties of a PRIO discipline with that of a CBQ discipline. I read some documentation and I found nothing about that, can you help me ? I think to try something like that : tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq … tc class add dev

Anyone notices that using sfq qdisc adds latency compared to pfifo? With "sfq perturb 10" ping latency is around 100-120ms, while with "pfifo limit 3" drops to ~10-30ms (qdiscs belong to htb class). I''m missing something or is this expected? { $TC_CLASS parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb prio 0 rate 900kbit ceil 1000kbit burst 7k $TC_QDISC parent 1:20 handle 200: {pfifo

Hi, I have implemented qos at my gateway, mostly for speeding up dns and [video,voice] chat traffic and to slow down p2p traffic. It seems every thing is working properly, as by browsing speed has been improved. But I want to test it by sending various traffic and to see through which qdisc the traffic flows, so that i can be certain that it is working the way I want it to work. The rules

Hi anyone I try to use htb and got some strange situation My hbt config is root htb with default to 999 class Then I make 2 classes 999 and 998 And make many many (near 60) leafs attached to 998 root ! ! 999 998 ---...---> many leafs root attached to ethernet dotQ subinterface 999 make rate where high (50Mbit) but according to tc -s class

Hi all, Long email but please be patient :) I am part of EHAS [1], a non profit organization which main goal is to improve the Healthcare assistance in isolated rural areas in developing countries. Recently we have developed a long distance Wi-Fi network in Cuzco (Peru). This network provides connectivity to 12 nodes (they are in fact Health Centers). As VoIP is a essential service in this

Hi all. I''ve written a small htb script that uses U32 and FW (marked by IPTABLES) filters, but TC doesn''t seem to be using the "cls_fw.o" module !!! I''m using redhat v9.0, kernel 2.4.8-20, iproute 2.4.7-7. Here is my script: ========================================================== ##################### #Interface definition #####################

Hello all. I''ve been struggling to QoS VoIP at our site and have a successful implementation at this point. Basically I had to set aside enough bandwidth for VoIP by placing all other traffic behind an HTB (multiple classes and queues behind it). Everything is fine. Here''s the diagram: ------- | eth | ------- | --------

Hello, I''m still new in using tc...I wanna ask... 1. what is the difference between classless and classful qdisc?? when I made a qdisc, are I must create both of that qdisc...??? 2. what is the difference beetween three of the classless qdisc in linux redhat 2.4, sfq pfifo and tbf if I using the htb classful qdisc ??? because when I use htb classful qdisc it means I made a qdisc that

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Hello, I have problems setting up HTB. This is my setup : NET 1024/256 ADSL || eth1 Linux Firewall eth0 || LAN 10.a.a.a I want to GUARANTEE for an IP (10.x.y.z) a 800kbit bandwidth for HTTP download. But When 10.x.y.z does no HTTP download, other trafic must get the whole bandwidth, of course. The script I use (see below) is quite the same as presented at (the greeeeat page) :

Hi all, I am testing one QOS system, I want to control bandwidth by VLAN id. Here is my test network: Internet Gateway | | QOS control box ( Bridge box, Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28 patch) | | VLAN Switch | | PC PC In my QOS control box, it is a bridge box, I used Redhat 9, 2.4.28 kernel with ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28

Hi, A thought for the list. As I mentioned in another posting, there are a lot of QoS mechanisms out there. Linux supports some, but not all. Some patchsets add others, but don''t work for all kernels. There are also userland implementations, usually sitting in software routers, but there are other packages. Would it be helpful if I worked on a table of what''s out there for

Hi, all: I''m involved in the study about the QoS,but have some problems , hope someone could help me answer: 1. Why most traffic shaping implement in the egress side (Uplink) rather than the ingress side(Dnlink)?(e.g. why put the police rule on the smaller bandwidth side but not put on the larger side) 2. I can''t differ the functionalities exactly

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but