similar to: Coexistence of Dynamic and Static routing

Hi, I am trying to do some simple ingress limiting based on fwmark. I know the ability and sense to do INGRESS limiting is ehm... limited ;-) but still I want to try it. I tried several things. === 1 === tcq ingress handle ffff: tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 12mbit burst 10k drop tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw police rate 10mbit burst 10k drop

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

Hi Nitin, First of all, you can verify that ntpd is responding on ingress with netcat : nc -u ingress 123 (udp connection on port 123) also try a netstat -an on ingress to be sure that the port 123 is in listen state... I recently install ntpdate, and it has worked as a client and a local ntp server immediatly. Good Luck, Yannick / Annecy in France -----Message d''origine----- De :

Hello, Stephen, List! Attached is the patch for iproute2 to add the possibility to use fwmark in u32 filters. The kernel part was included in 2.6.10. Please apply! Thank you! For more info: - Kernel patch (not needed for 2.6.10): http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/net-match-nfmark-in-u32.patch - Examples: http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/mark_in_u32/examples.txt --- Catalin(ux aka Dino)

Greetings from a newbie! (Well, to this list anyway) I''m having a problem and I hope someone here might be able to help... I am strongly expecting an answer along the lines of "upgrade to v2.4.x", but I would REALLY preffer to avoid that for now... The setup: "Home brewed" v2.2.24 (will patch to v2.2.25 later today) with the DS8 patch applied. Currently

Hi all! In short: Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets? Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives, like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio? In long: I''m a hungarian univ student involved in a project (RMD-QoS stuff) which needs

Before I start, I don''t want to do ECMP or simple bonding ... I have multiple Internet connections available to multiple boxes on one of my networks. Box A connects to ISPs 1, 2 and 3 Box B connects to ISPs 1 and 4 Boxes A and B are both connected to each other and the rest of the network. 1) I would like to set up some dynamic routing in such a way that any given outgoing packet from

My setup: LAN A | |-- Wireless-r1 --| |-- Wireless-r2 --| ..................| .................LAN B LAN A is my primary (external) LAN. LAN B is my wireless LAN. LAN A does iBGP and OSPF routing. Each wireless router does the following: 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN A 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN B 2 VLANs on LAN A 5 VLANs on LAN B UCARP on each wireless

Hello, thanks for the time to read this. I am doing a proof of concept in the following context. I have a NT 4.0 domain and because I don't want AD, I am moving towards a MIT Kerberos managed domain which still gives me SSO and thru kerberized SAMBA, file sharing. What I have setup so far is XP workstations SSO into the MIT Kerberos domain, I can access shares on the Samba server

Hi, currently I got the following problem: The system contains a HFC-PCI card, it's running without problems under zaphfc. Now this system also should send/receive faxes. Receiving faxes works with rxfax (spandsp) but txfax is not comfortable enough and doesnt bring the demanded results. So an older external ISDN modem and mgetty-sendfax is used for sending faxes. I'd like to send the

I am running Dovecot 1.2.16 and considering moving up to 2.0.8. I have found <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0> but there's not a lot about deploying a 2.0 server alongside an existing 1.2. Any hints on a seamless approach to this, especially one that might allow me to upgrade individual users in place, without moving their maildirs into a new tree and still avoid issues with

Is it still considered best practice to uninstall sssd to ensure there are no conflicts with winbind? I ask because Red Hat is installing sssd by default even on a minimal install of RHEL 8.8 (may apply to earlier releases of RHEL 8). This caught me off guard as MINIMAL is supposed to mean something... ::sigh:: I only discovered this by accident when checking to ensure the /etc/nsswitch.conf

On a custom compiled Linux 2.6.13 kernel... # tc qdisc add dev ppp145 handle ffff: ingress # tc filter add dev ppp145 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 384kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument This works fine on a CentOS machine and my Fedora Core 2 box with default kernel. I''m trying to figure out what is missing in the

Hi Guys, I would just like to have advice and pointers of the best way would be, Someting like BGP or OSPF? I have 2 internet connections at diffrent locations. let say connection A and B 1.) router A has a fast internet connection and a seperate interface for clients using /lan/pppoe/ipsec etc and another ethernet interface going to router B 2.) router B has similiar setup as router A and

I am trying to execute a program under rh 7.2 with an application switch '/'. Though the documentation states this is possible I have been unable to execute with success. I have tried many escape variations for the slash but that has not worked either. Any thoughts? Thanks! Loren

Hi, I am trying to implement a simple scaled-down version of the AF traffic class type. As such I basically want to remark non-conforming AF11 packets to AF13. Here is m script that I have been using on the ingress router of my network: ---------------------------------------- Link=''dev eth1'' Rate1=''rate 800Kbit'' Rate2=''rate 2500Kbit''

Dear Sir, I have point-point ethernet connections to my linux boxes on which I am running Zebra OSPFD. I am unable to understand the output of the tcpdump. Please clarify the terms in the output. The output of the command tcpdump on BOX 1 is as follows: I have also shown a part of my network below. 14:0831.849801 eth0 M 192.168.2.2 > 224.0.0.5: OSPF v2-hello 48: rtrid 192.168.4.2 backbone

Hi I am trying to have a built in initramfs along with the traditional initrd. So I mount the initrd from the initramfs, but am facing problems in trying to run the 'linuxrc'. Following are the issues: 1. I mount the initrd from the initramfs and exceve 'linuxrc'. It starts executing linuxrc, but gives the following errors and panics: Red hat nash version 3.4.42 starting

Hi Everyone; Please find below a mail I sent to quagga mailing list, covering lartc/quagga issue. So far, I have no reply from them. I think that maybe you guys would have an idea about this. Thanks in advance ! Best, -----Forwarded Message----- Hi There, I''m new to quagga and to dynamic routing in general, so please forgive me if my question are foobar. I''m trying to

Hi all I have a trouble configuring the qdiscs, when I indicate the "perturb 10" option to tc, i gives me this error: tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 5:1323 handle 1323 sfq perturb 10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument if I don''t put the "perturb 10" option, it works. another question is about iptables, when I indicate the " --set-mark" option: iptables -t