similar to: HTB''s scalability

Hello, I''ve just compiled the kernel 2.6.17 and noticed an odd HTB behaviour. For instance: tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbit ceil 750Kbit burst 15k tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 15 u32 match ip dst 192.168.5.1 classid 1:30 The filter works ok and the traffic to 192.168.5.1 flows through the class 1:30, but the rate gets much higher than

This is my simple situation: I want to policy download and shape upload going through my router. It has two interfaces: eth0 (10.4.10.222/24 connected to LAN) and eth1 (172.16.0.1/24 connected to my laptop). My setup: [eth1] tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 999 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1Mbit tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match

Hello, Currently I use following htb configuration: --------------- 1:0 ----------- / | \ 1:1 1:2 1:x / | \ / | \ / | \ 1:1001 1:2001 1:3001 1:1002 1:2002 1:3002 Classes like 1:1,1:2,1:3 limit my clients to some value, let''s say 128kbit/s. Classes like 1:1001 are

Hi, After spectacularly failing to get HTB to proportionately distribute excess bandwidth into multiple classes based on the rate, I decided to hack my requirements. Now I''m creating multiple classes with the sum of the bandwidths of the classes being equal to (OK, slightly less than) the link bandwidth. Scenario: Linux Router +------+ 256K

Hello all, I have using htb for last 10-12 months to manage the bandwidth share. Until last month everything was ok, but now after a kernel upgrade (from 2.4.20 to 2.4.26 because a kernel bug that generate a oops) the Linux router is droping packets. It is weird because the "tc -s class ls dev eth1" (in the class I monitor) reports no packet drop, the "tc -s qdisc ls dev

Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate

Help me  ... I try use the tc filter, but seems he doesn''t work, I already reconfigured my kernel ( 2.4.32 ) with all options related a QOS enabled ( like modules ) and nothing happens. I get the tc tool from HTB source package, well  this is my set : eth0 is my internal NIC. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate

Hi all ! I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem, and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please excuse my terrible english, i''m french. >From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations, readmes and lartc.org

Hi All, I have posted this messgage yesterday in the Beowulf mailing list, and did not get any responses, as i have tried different Centos kernels to see if the behaviour changes or not, and it did not change much, I am posting it here, I hope no one minds, and thanks in advance for any pointers or clues? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Walid <walid.shaari at gmail.com>

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

Hi there, I have a question with regards to cascading multiple HTB qdiscs. Assume that I want to build the following hierarchy: (qdisc htb 1:0) -> (class htb 1:1) -> (qdisc htb 2:0) -> (class htb 2:1) -> (class htb 2:2) I want to attache aggregate u32 filters at 1:0 for supernets, then at 2:0 (and 3:0, 4:0, etc), I attach the more specific u32 filters for say HTTP and

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hi, When I map directory using samba o nour Windows 2000, I have to type in the IP address of the samba server or the complete domain name; i.e, host.lmsw.lmco.com. I can't just type in the hostname; i.e. host. Your help is very much apreciated. Thanks Aissa Char Lockheed Martin Aero

Thank you Andy! I did''t find why I could''t use the fw match in ingress. Now it works. Now I ran into another problem: When I try to add a pfifo_fast leaf qdisc dor htb classes it seg.-faults. Is pfifo_fast a special qdisc? I can succesfully add other type of qdiscs. I found that a similar problem was reported in february on a MIPS architecture. root@zefir:/usr/src# tc qdisc

I have 4 VLANs which i would like to give different priority on our internet connection. I would also like to shape traffic, according to its FWmark, in EACH VLAN. I have created this setup, with a HTB classes in a HTB class in a HTB class. (3 levels). ROOT IMQ1 QDISC 1:0 | HTB 1:1 (HTB AT LINE UPPER LIMIT) |

I've got a user that wants an Access database shared out. I've got a decent machine serving out the directory (300 MHz Pentium II) running RedHat 5.0 (kernel 2.0.34) with Samba 1.9.17p4 (RPM is samba-1.9.17p4-3). I've created a simple share entry in the smb.conf file: [global] debug level = 1 browsable = yes comment = Samba under Linux (RedHat 5.0) domain master = yes

Hi, I''ve been migrating an existing htb-based traffic shaper from a hideous (I''m allowed to call it that - I wrote the damn atrocity myself) tc shell script into a TCNG configuration file, and after a few false starts I think I managed to get the syntax right. However, during tests it looks like some of the tiers aren''t passing their restrictions on to lower levels.

Hello everybody! With a HTB qdisc: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 99: htb How can I change the "final qdisc" of the default walk-throught class? # tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 99:0 handle 88: sfq results in: "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument" CBQ automatically creates a xx:0 root class where I can attach final qdiscs... - If there is a root class in htb, how is it

Newbie here... tcng version 10b I''m just learning about htb and using tcng. I am trying to make the example in Martin A. Brown''s Traffic Control with tcng and HTB HOWTO v0.5 example 2 /* * Simply commented example of a tcng traffic control file. * * Martin A. Brown <mabrown@securepipe.com> * * Example: Using class selection path. * * (If you are reading the

Hey everyone, For some reason my htb configuration isn''t allowing any class to burst up to its ceiling ever, even when the link is only being utilised by one class that class only ever gets its assigned rate and exactly that assigned rate... The hierarchy I have is 1: at the root with no default, then 1:2 and 1:3 under that, both with assigned rates, then 2: and 3: under those