similar to: Future of QoS in Linux

Hi I share my bandwith (adsl 512/128) between 12 users. I set up simple qos script for incoming (IMQ) and outgoing traffic using htb in root, 4 classess and esfq qdisc at leafs. Interactive traffic goeas to class1 , http,mail etc. to class2, p2p, ftp to class3, and rest to class4. Classess divide link in proportion 20% (prio 1), 40% (prio 2), 20% (prio 3) ,20% (prio 4) This works

Hi I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge. Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0). Br0 have public IP. Eth0 connects to the internet. Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs). Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24). My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit. I''m doing SNAT for my Lan. QoS on eth0 works fine for DMZ, but is there a possibility to doing QoS on

Hi Marcin, There is no problem to make limitation on a linux bridge. The rule must be the same as for a router: there must be applied on eth0 and eth1. All my best, Liviu On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:48 +0200, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi I have a small lan (10.0.0.0/8) behind my linux box. I use MASQUERADE to allow users connects to internet. I set up an esfq qdisc for outgoing traffic. And there is a little question. Does source hash type in esfq recognize NATed local ip''s? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing

Witam I''ve found many examples where packets are redirected to IMQ device in PREROUTING chain for ingress traffic shaping purposes. But is there any sense in redirecting packets to IMQ in FORWARD chain also for ingress traffic shaping purposes? -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi I have Linux box (Debian) that acting as a bridge. Eth0 and Eth1 are bridged (br0). Br0 have public IP. Eth0 connects to the internet. Eth1 connect to servers in DMZ (with public IPs). Eth2 connects my Lan (192.168.1.0/24). My connections is 2Mbit/2Mbit. I want to limit upload speed for each service on each server in DMZ, but also for users on my Lan. The same for

Witam Anybody know how to deal with dcc irc sessions? I want to put them to lower priority queue, but i dont know how to track them, and then mark to use with fw filter. I tried iptables with -m helper --helper irc, but it seems to match only outgoing dcc sessions. But what about incoming? I''m shaping traffic from and to my small, NATed lan. -- Pozdrawiam Marcin

Hi, I''m new to the list. I intend to learn about some Linux Networking features to help myself and others. I''m looking to control the bandwidth in my office. Basically there are like 20 computers, a 2MB Adsl Line. And I would love to let them only use a certain amount of bandwidth. For example let every client use 20KB of internet bandwidth of the 210KB we can download

Hi I have tried to compile tcng-9m using Linux SuSE 9.1 Professional on my Intel box but it doesn''t work as follows: Step 1 - Downloaded iproute2-2.4.7_now_ss020116_try-i386-2.tgz Step 2 - Downloaded tcng-9m.tar.gz Step 3 - Downloaded linux-2.5.4.tar.bz2 Step 4 - Source kernel 2.5.4 extracted to directory ~/tcng/tcsim Step 5 - Source iproute2-2.4.7 extracted to directory

Hi. I did send this to `jaazz@post.cz'', but I suspect the list is a more appropriate/useful place for it. It''s a question about Michal Charvat''s QoS extension to Net-SNMP. When I look at the MIB entries for the QoS handles, I get something like this - enterprises.qos.qosObjectTable.qosObject.qosHandle.0.0 = Gauge32: 0

I just wanted to drop a success notice to the list. We always hear the failures, and rarely the successes! ;-) After switching from FC1 and freeS/WAN ipsec to the new native linux 2.6 ipsec (ie: setkey-based) my QoS code suddenly started working properly! Previously, with FC1 and freeS/WAN, I found it impossible and rather buggy (kernel panics!) to get QoS to make any difference at all. My

Why not try something like Pebble linux from http://www.nycwireless.net/pebble It is a stripped down Debian install that is aimed at running a wireless hotspot but it is just Debian and you can install whatever you want. It fits on a 64MB flash card but if you install almost anything you will want a 128MB one. It does come with iptables and iproute2 tools as I recall. Patrick

Hi sombody know what is happen with Jim diGriz''s QoS Script Web Page ? www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script Regards _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello All, I am interested in QoS provided by Linux, when I looked into IP header I came accross ToS field, also while going more into detail about QoS I found that the QoS based on ToS is serviced thru DiffServ which in turn gives more priority to packets with higher value is ToS field, but I am not able to understand when we finally call dev->hard_start_xmit routine of underlying device

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Hi, i''m testing QoS MPLS on IP network. I''m confusing about what are features that permit Multi Protocol Label Switching to support QoS on a network. Can you clarify me it? In particular about the integration between MPLS and DiffServe Thanks in advance for the help _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hi all, I find the whole QOS area quite fascinating and I''m considering starting a small business to try and push QOS solutions in general to small and medium sized businesses. I would of course be happy to push Packeteer and Cisco kit to those who want it, but to be honest the product of choice from a cost and functionality point of view seems to be linux I would appreciate any

Hello, I''ve tried searching for this but I don''t seem to be able to find a way to search past archives in this list. Is there a way to get a per-process qos functionality in linux? At this very moment, I''m using with success a kind of ''workaround'' in my server, which involves creating multiple virtual ethernet interfaces with different IPs and binding

Please see below Jon Flechsenhaar Boeing WNW Team Network Services (714)-762-1231 202-E7 -----Original Message----- From: Flechsenhaar, Jon J Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:35 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: [LARTC] 2.6.14 - HTB/SFQ QoS broken? Jody: I don''t know if you answer basic HTB questions but I''l try anyway. I''m implementing AF and EF with a

Hello, Has anyone had any luck compiling Alexander''s QOS script on a vanilla FC3 or FC2 box? I just cant seem to get the darn thing to port right. Regards, Bryan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/