Romulo Curty Cerqueira
2004-Aug-22 03:34 UTC
Compiling tcng on Linux SuSE 9.1 Professional
Hi I have tried to compile tcng-9m using Linux SuSE 9.1 Professional on my Intel box but it doesn''t work as follows: Step 1 - Downloaded iproute2-2.4.7_now_ss020116_try-i386-2.tgz Step 2 - Downloaded tcng-9m.tar.gz Step 3 - Downloaded linux-2.5.4.tar.bz2 Step 4 - Source kernel 2.5.4 extracted to directory ~/tcng/tcsim Step 5 - Source iproute2-2.4.7 extracted to directory ~/tcng/tcsim/iproute2 Step 6 - Run ~/tcng/configure Error message = : invalid option I have tried to make the docs in ~/tcng/docs but it also doesn''t work. Error message = make: ../scripts/rlatex: Command not found make: *** [tcng.dvi] Error 127 So, does anybody knows where can I find a step by step configuration doc ? Thanks in advance. Romulo Curty Cerqueira < curty@ieee.org > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
lartc@manchotnetworks.net
2004-Aug-24 15:27 UTC
Re: Compiling tcng on Linux SuSE 9.1 Professional
Hi Romulo, I think that you do have the tetex-latex package installed and therefore you are unable to compile the documentation. You can install the package or do a ./configure --no-manual Hope this Helps! Cheers Charles On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 05:34, Romulo Curty Cerqueira wrote:> Hi > > I have tried to compile tcng-9m using > Linux SuSE 9.1 Professional on my Intel box but it doesn''t work as follows: > > Step 1 - Downloaded iproute2-2.4.7_now_ss020116_try-i386-2.tgz > Step 2 - Downloaded tcng-9m.tar.gz > > Step 3 - Downloaded linux-2.5.4.tar.bz2 > > Step 4 - Source kernel 2.5.4 extracted to directory ~/tcng/tcsim > > Step 5 - Source iproute2-2.4.7 extracted to directory ~/tcng/tcsim/iproute2 > > Step 6 - Run ~/tcng/configure > > Error message = > : invalid option > > I have tried to make the docs in ~/tcng/docs but it also doesn''t work. > Error message = > make: ../scripts/rlatex: Command not found > make: *** [tcng.dvi] Error 127 > > So, does anybody knows where can I find a step by step configuration doc ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Romulo Curty Cerqueira < curty@ieee.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi there guys, i am on my last year of career, and as my final Project i am interested in doing something about QoS. The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the users. For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics welcome :) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the > beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. > > Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that > based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" > in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the > parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the > users. > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > welcome :)Very good idea, I don''t know how hard it would be to implement it, though. -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:18:03 +0200 Damjan <gdamjan@mail.net.mk> wrote:> > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > > welcome :) > > Very good idea, > I don''t know how hard it would be to implement it, though.This idea was once my Master Science work proposal. I was crucified by the Phd''s saying that AI does not goes well with packet classifying at high speeds (something to do with ''too big decision tree''). You can read ''high speeds'' like 100+ Mbits networks. My 2 cents. All the best -- Ethy H. Brito /"\ InterNexo Ltda. \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML +55 (12) 3941-6860 X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL S.J.Campos - Brasil / \ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
GoMi, For an ongoing project on QoS we looked at something similar but were weary of complex decisions being made at high speeds, particularly as most users questioned would prefer to have a guaranteed equal share of the bandwidth. Currently we are working on a GUI that allows users to mark their traffic as belonging to Gold/Silver or Bronze classes of service. They are then charged appropriately per volume. The results obtained by this approach thus far are quite satisfactory. Regards Brian On 24 Aug 2004 at 18:47, GoMi wrote:> Hi there guys, i am on my last year of career, and as my final Project i am > interested in doing something about QoS. > > The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the > beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. > > Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that > based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" > in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the > parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the > users. > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > welcome :) > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/-- Brian Carrig Department of Computing & Networking Institute of Technology, Carlow Tel. No.: +353 59 9176209 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Witam There is similar, finished project that also uses concept of neural networks. http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/SR/prace-mgr/kaszynski/ Unfortunately, this is all in polish. -- Pozdrawiam Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
or use this link : http://www.tranexp.com:2000/InterTran?type=url&url=http%3A%2F%2Frainbow.mimuw.edu.pl%2FSR%2Fprace-mgr%2Fkaszynski%2F&text=&from=pol&to=eng adrian> Witam > > There is similar, finished project that also uses concept of neural > networks. > http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/SR/prace-mgr/kaszynski/ > > Unfortunately, this is all in polish. > > > -- > Pozdrawiam > Marcin mailto:slacklist@op.pl > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > > > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > > > welcome :) > > > > Very good idea, > > I don''t know how hard it would be to implement it, though. > > This idea was once my Master Science work proposal. I was crucified by the Phd''s saying that AI does not goes well with packet classifying at high speeds (something to do with ''too big decision tree''). You can read ''high speeds'' like 100+ Mbits networks.You don''t need to make an AI decission for every packet transmited, you just need the AI to sligthly reconfigure your TC setup, based on stats already gathered by the TC system. -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/