similar to: imq patch question

> From: "Roy" <roy@xxx.lt> > > I want to set interface to promisc mode and do all routing with iptables. > Is it somehow possible? as I see now kernel do not pass everything to > ipables. > > Basicaly I want to ignore ethernet addess and use only ip for routing. > > I suppose this may require writting special kernel driver or it > is possible > in

lartc-request,hello! 　　 I find a line in tbf_change() in sch_tbf.c: ptab = xchg(&q->P_tab, ptab); Can I consider that the pointers are exchanged between q->P_tab and ptab? as following: prev=q->R_tab; q->R_tab = rtab; rtab = prev; Is my understanding righ? ======= 2002-03-23 12:01:00 you wrote:======= >Send LARTC mailing list

I''ve followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a couple of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was his name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in my test environment. I now need to implement it in my production environment. My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection to the

Hello All Its first time i posting to this mail list :). I have done something (maybe) important. I write new IMQ device driver based from Martin Devera and Patrick McHardy implementation with device EOS support. My current implementation supporting only egress trafic shaping and kernel 2.4.25. For more details, source and examples have look at my page http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos Ill

Hi Guys, I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9 and I want to know is this procedure is correct: ---------------------------------------- - In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux) # cd /usr/src/linux # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff # patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff - In Patch O Matic Directory

Hello, Sorry for the many Ccs, but I hope to reach all parties involved. I want to do traffic shaping with NAT and I wanted to do it with IFB instead of IMQ [1]. I tried a lot of things but now I am stuck (and maybe confused). The setup: eth0 eth1 WAN/(Internet) <-> Linux Router <-> LAN Linux router: - does NAT for the LANs - runs local processes

Hello there, Can someone please explain why do one neeed IMQ ? I can already shape incoming traffic on my nat router by creating qdiscs on LAN-side interface. I have done some tests, whith simple bandwidth limmiting, and it works. I''ve read just about all the stuff on www.linuximq.net ... but couldn''t make myself an ideea on why would someone need IMQ for ingress policing ...

Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as it was in previous relases. Are there

Hi! I would like to thank very much for this great page with Kernel Packet Traveling Diagram and to suggest small update concerning IMQ. I think the sentence: "IMQ in input comes before nat so IMQ does not know the real ip address. Ingress comes after nat, so ingress knows the real ip address." could be more precise like that: "By default IMQ in PREROUTING comes before nat and

I am attempting to implement IMQ on a 2.4.31 version kernel with iptables 1.3.3. I am following the example at http://www.linuximq.net/usage.html. When I enter the line iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j IMQ --todev1 (eth1 is the external interface), the computer slows to a crawl. OK, the CPU is only an AMD K6 233 which is not the world''s greatest CPU, but egress shaping is

I have a linux box with kernel 2.4.22 and iptables 1.2.9 First, i patch linux kernel with Norbet Buckmuller''s .diff #cd \usr\src\linux #patch -p1 < imq-combo-debian-2.4.22.diff All correct Second, i -try to- patch iptables (following www.linuximq.net/faq.html) #cd /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter I edit IMQ.pom-ng.patch and replace $KERNEL_DIR with /usr/src/linux #patch

Hi there, I''m trying to contact imq maintainers but there is no contact address in www.linuximq.net. There is only a yahoo group but I don''t have a yahoo account and it seems it doesn''t like me a lot (it refused to create a new account). Anyone knows an email address for any IMQ developer? Its about an IMQ patch submission. <<V13>>

Hi, I see some inertion on www.linuximq.net, while kernels are at full speed, so here is my testing proposition for IMQ with: - some minor bugs removed in imq.c (like improper err handling while registering queue handler), - changes in ipt_IMQ.c and ip6t_IMQ.c to work with linux-2.6.17.4 (iptables-1.3.5), - added functionality to change behavior with module parameter (without recompiling).

Hi, I''m working on the IMQ patch for 2.6.14-rc* and ran in trouble with nfcache. I have to be honest that I''m not following kernel devel as I should so I need to ask for a little help here. I know Mr Harald Welte removed nfcache but I''m not sure about the way to go. I have this at net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt-IMQ.c: static unsigned int imq_target(struct sk_buff **pskb,

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit

Hello I''ve been messing with traffic controlling for some time and encountered singularities I''d like to talk about. First explaining of my pow (can''t tell how much each point is relevant) Box with Debian, Intel PII*2 old and fancy:), ADSL link with dyn IP, some servers (f. ex. squid), loc net with dhcp, (although IP statically given by MAC); MASQ. Such circumstances

Hi! I answer to two messages from this thread (I use digest). lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: ibro tj <ibb_linux@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip. > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br > > Hi, > > the hint from Martin A Brown which I am

Hi, I''ve been having a really strange thing happen. I can''t remember when it happened, or if it coincided with a shorewall update, but if I have shorewall "running", my 100mbps connection is limited to about 1-6mbps per connection. This is with TC/Shaping/QoS disabled or enabled. I have no idea if its shorewall doing something funky or ipables or what, but if I

I agree, but this is still better than crashing the machine... Aron -----Original Message----- From: Michael Renzmann [mailto:mrenzmann@otaku42.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: Aron Brand Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; roy@xxx.lt Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Hi. Aron Brand wrote: > does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the

Hey folks, I stumbled across the Mastershaper project ( http://www.mastershaper.org/ ) but I have a little problem: I wanted to shape the traffic coming from the router itself aswell as coming from the LAN behind the router, for that task I need IMQ, but with IMQ iptables-(layer7)-matching is not possible. Now I''ve talked with the programmer and he said the following: >The problem is