similar to: question re ip rules logic

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Bug ID: 1117 Summary: Table ipv4-nat prerouting dnat doesn't accept dest IP:PORT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hi, my box is connected to 3 networks, eth0 eth1 wlan0. I want "my" traffic to go via wlan0 and everything from eth1 NATed to eth0: eth0 192.168.1.10/24 eth1 172.16.1.1/12 wlan0 192.168.10.190/24 I first tried this with two single hosts: iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o eth0 -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o wlan0 -t nat echo 200 Forw >>

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan

Hi, I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that I can not explain: default gw (WORKS) ---------- rabbit@Thesaurus:~$ ping -c 1 yahoo.com PING yahoo.com

Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221 Bug ID: 1221 Summary: "fib" produces strange results with an IPv6 default route Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5

Hi, Please suppose following config: Two external interfaces for two different providers On each of them configured NAT for specific IP addr. ie. 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 1.1.1.30/30 brd 1.1.1.31 scope global eth2 6: eth4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 2.2.2.66/27 brd 2.2.2.95 scope global eth4 On eth2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1220 Bug ID: 1220 Summary: Reverse path filtering using "fib" needs better documentation Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft

Using R 2.7.0 under WinXP. I need to write a function that takes a non-negative vector and returns the parallell maximum between a percentage of this argument and a fixed value. Both the percentages and the fixed values depend on which interval x falls in. Intervals are as follows: >From | To | % of x | Minimum

Dear folks, I had to rewrite UPS::Nut because it was not developed since 2002 and it was based a very old version of upsd speaking a totally outdated protocol. If some of you interested in it you can get from my debian repository. package name is libups-nut-perl. Add this to your APT sources: deb http://debian6.ki.iif.hu/ lenny contrib deb-src http://debian6.ki.iif.hu/ lenny contrib Or simply

Dear all, I have problems with iif function using sqldf library. I counted abundance (Num) of different "SPECIES" in two moments (esf) saving the information in two Tables (esf50, esf100): esf50 SAMPLE SPECIES Num esf 1289 diso1 44 50 1289 diso2 5 50 1289 diso3

Hi all, I''m trying to set up a computer with 2 routes to the internet, much as described at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html .One of my interfaces (eth5, 192.168.2.2) is only used for traffic originating inside the network. The other (eth1, 192.168.1.2) is only used for a VPN, where all (udp) traffic originates from outside our network. I have created a second

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

Hi all, i''m puzzled by a ploblem and I don''t know how to debug it... I have a firewall with 2 gateways, adsl and isdn. Main gateway is via adsl, backup via isdn. I setup 2 table ''adsl'' and ''isdn''. You can find a description below. I made a script to test both tables. That mainly 1. adds an iptables -t mangle -A

Lars, interesting - do you have an example of what that might look like in the config file? Thanks! On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 6:00 PM Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> wrote: > Hello Christoph, > > I am glad, that you discovered the source of the problem! > > > Am Sat, 4 May 2019 08:30:28 +0200 > schrieb "Christopher Klinge" <Christ.Klinge at web.de>:

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM Ido Schimmel <idosch at idosch.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:04:25AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:15 AM Ido Schimmel <idosch at idosch.org> wrote: > > > > > > +Willem > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 08:45:40AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

I am making a plot from R indicating an average, min and max value for a number of sample types. as horizontal lines with the sample types on the y-axis. (see http://home.newmedia.no/sickel/R.html for the plot and code) In some cases, the min value is the detection limit, and I would like to indicate that bu using a <, rather than the usual | I use for indicating the value. I am plotting each

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 Bug ID: 1371 Summary: Concatenations Literal sets Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: