similar to: Setkey

I just wanted to drop a success notice to the list. We always hear the failures, and rarely the successes! ;-) After switching from FC1 and freeS/WAN ipsec to the new native linux 2.6 ipsec (ie: setkey-based) my QoS code suddenly started working properly! Previously, with FC1 and freeS/WAN, I found it impossible and rather buggy (kernel panics!) to get QoS to make any difference at all. My

Hi all :-) I have a problem with my current configuration of ipsec. I''m using ipsec with kernel 2.6 and racoon. I have two computers linked by wireless cards. The first (192.168.1.1 Zeus) is connected to internet through a DSL modem and the second (192.168.1.2 Memphis) is accessing internet through the first. I want with ipsec to encrypt all datas between the two computers. I can

hello i am trying to set up ipsec in my network, for now just between two hosts, using to use AH & ESP in tunnel mode to get all of packet encrypted. keys are negotiated with racoon. mayby using tunnel mode in this case can seems strange, but i know what i am doing. after setting up everything i have done few tests with ping & tcpdump. but the results are very suprising. bellow is what i

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way:

Hello, I''m trying to put 3 nodes in a vpn in tunnel mode. When I run setkey on the following file, I end up with The result of line 33: File exists. That error isn''t overly helpful, so I was hoping that someone could explain the issue. Here''s the file, with line 33 highlighted. Help appreciated. Mike # Flush the SAD and SPD flush; spdflush; # Add SA for

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Hello. I try to configure IPSEC to bybass ssh protocol. For example: setkey -FP setkey -F setkey -c << EOF spdadd 10.1.1.1/32 10.6.10.50[22] tcp -P in none ; spdadd 10.1.1.1/32 10.6.10.50 tcp -P in ipsec ah/transport//require ; EOF (Pass incoming ssh packets to 10.6.10.50, block other tcp packets) This works under fresh 7-CURRENT(FAST_IPSEC). On fresh 6-STABLE (neither FAST_IPSEC nor

Hi, First, never compare a linux box with a cheap and dumb broadband router. I''m not sure if i understand very well your scenario but I asume is like this: 192.168.0.1--------- -----------| ipsec | | --------- 128.X.X.X --------- 192.168.0.254 | ISP ----------| linux |------------------| --------- | ---------

Lots of updates to the IPSEC documentation on http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.ipsec.html The page lists 4 patches which should be applied to 2.5.47 and 1 patch to be applied to the kame racoon Internet Key Exchange daemon. If these are all applied, everything I throw at it works, modulo some annoying logmessages. Especially new & cool is http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.ipsec.automatic.keying.html

Hi all. The IPSec part of the LARTC howto is great, but I''ve hit a problem in 7.3. IPSEC tunnels. The example given is for manual keying: add 10.0.0.216 10.0.0.11 esp 34501 -m tunnel -E 3des-cbc "123456789012123456789012"; How does one setup "tunnel mode" using racoon? Trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between two subnets: 10.10.42.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 using a

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

hi there, I just wanted to share a recent discovery I did on how to setup a secure VPN implementation for linux 2.4.x (I''m using 2.4.20 but it should be working, as far as documentation states, for > 2.4.18) without using FreeS/WAN. The tool (ipsec_tunnel: http://ringstrom.mine.nu/ipsec_tunnel/, by Tobias Ringström) is a kernel module based on ipip and ip_gre. It uses CyptoAPI to

> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Panula [mailto:greg.panula@dolaninformation.com] > Sent: 12 May 2003 11:10 > To: Matthew Braithwaite > Cc: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: iHEADS UP: ipsec packet filtering change > > You don't really need the gif tunnels for ipsec. Gif is more geared > towards ipv4 <=> ipv6 type tunnels. A few of ipsec

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

Hi there, I am just starting out with the TC and iproute2 tools. I have given Bert Hubert''s Linux Advanced Routing And Traffic Control Howto a couple of reads but know I don''t have a full grasp of concepts yet. My immediate need is to make sure ipsec traffic between two linux firewall/routers is given the greatest priority over all other traffic. In more detail I have

Hi, I''m not sure this is the right list for this type of question... as IPSec isn''t exactly routing. If someone can point me to a dedicated IPSec list (for the 2.6 implementation) i''d be very grateful :) Onto the actual problem... I''m going to be using IPSec to secure a wireless access point. So far, in my experimentation, i have the tunnel from

Here''s a challenging problem for you experts to tackle: I''m trying to shape traffic going into an IPSEC interface which then goes over a DSL PPPoE interface. I figure I need to shape the DSL interface to keep it''s hardware queue mostly empty, and to