Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "TEQL+HTB (?)"
2005 Feb 15
2
Poll: what features are you lusting for in v4
While we're waiting on the keebler elves to make the new CentOS 4, what
feature(s) are you most lusting after in RHEL/CentOS 4?
For me:
- official Mysql 4!!! (man does this make me happy)
- official Subversion
..are my top two, they will make me a happy camper for so many projects.
:) Sure sure the 2.6 kernel is nice, but that super-patched 2.4 kernel
on v3 seems to work quite well
2005 Jul 12
0
Teql and NetEm can''t work together
Thanks in advance!
Summary: when I load netem and teql together, teql doesn''t work
correctly. (If I load teql only, everything is fine)
I loaded both netem and teql. Netem is associated with eth0, and teql is
associated with both eth0 and eth1. But traffic only goes out of eth1.
Attached are the commands that I used to configure teql and netem (on
machine 1), and commands to
2005 Aug 10
0
teql on virtual network interfaces ?
Hi all,
I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to
interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create
multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql
will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted
teql is achieved (my guess).
I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I
2003 May 07
0
teql and gre tunnel
Hi everybody,
I want to do the following setup :
| | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | |
Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B
| | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | |
This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the
encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel.
It seems to work fine
2000 Oct 10
3
TEQL: 2 Mbit eth1 + 2Mbit eth2 = 1Mbit teql0
Hi there,
I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them
together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate
1Mbit/s!
My setup:
I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by
two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I
first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the
2005 Jan 14
2
PHP+Oracle problem
Hi!
I have succesfully installed Oracle 9.2.0.4 on Centos. Everything is
fine with it.
Then I recompiled php-4.3.2-19.ent.src.rpm with
rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'oracle 1' php-4.3.2-19.ent.src.rpm
The compilation was successful, and I got the php and the php-oci8
rpms.
Then I installed them both. After this one running the following PHP
script:
<?php
$c =
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Bridge + Teql!
Dear Gurus,
Can you please help/guide me with the following:
I have 3 NICs in my Linux RH 9 (kernel 2.4.20) machine. (eth0, eth1
and eth2). I want to setup a 'link equalizer' (teql) between eth0 and
eth1. This I am able to do with the required commands (using the
utilities 'tc' and 'ip').
Now I need to setup a bridge between eth2 and this new interface
2003 Mar 12
0
nat on teql devices
HI,
I have a problem with nat on teql devices, i set the nat on iptables and
he''s accept well , but don''t work ... he don''t masq or nat anything, i try
using -j MASQUERADE too, but without results.. i m using the command:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 10.0.0.0/24 --to ip-teql-device
On kernel 2.2x with ipchains works great.
2005 Jun 22
2
Question: TEQL via gateway
Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided
that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and
hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam.
I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The
two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a
gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send
2002 May 02
0
Using TEQL with two ADSL connection
Sorry this is the right message.
Hi all,
in my school I have:
- two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT),
- one linux box with 3 ethernet card
I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line.
I have configured the system as follow:
The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address
(A) 192.168.0.254
(B) 192.168.2.254
The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address:
-eth2
2006 Oct 31
0
TEQL: how to notice link down?
Is it possible to detect if a link is down in a TEQL device, so that I
will receive a mail on such occasion?
TIA
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
web: www.askesis.nl
2005 Jul 25
0
teql load balancing on tap devices
Hello list,
I''d like to use teql with tap devices (two OpenVPN tunnels). This works,
but the doc /usr/src/linux-<version>/net/sched/sch_teql.c says:
"1. Slave devices MUST be active devices, i.e., they must raise the
tbusy signal and generate EOI events. If you want to equalize virtual
devices like tunnels, use a normal eql device."
I can''t find if tap devices
2005 Jun 21
0
TEQL and Subnet problem (reformatted)
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1,
P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2
and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between
P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL
is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by
round-robin sending packets
2005 Jun 23
6
urgent TEQL problem
OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t
solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on
it :( )
The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected
directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is
connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My
problem is teql can''t
2005 Jun 21
2
TEQL and Subnet problem
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My
problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"),
the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to
P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking
for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route
to
2007 Jul 19
0
tc qdisc TEQL limited to two interfaces? [ 1.8Gbps ]
I''am using the following script to aggregate the bandwidth of one quad
gigabit ethernet controller (pci-express).
#!/bin/bash
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 30
ifconfig eth1 up
ifconfig eth2 up
ifconfig eth3 up
ifconfig eth4 up
modprobe sch_teql
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0
tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0
tc qdisc del dev eth3 root teql0
tc qdisc del dev eth4 root teql0
ip link
2007 Aug 24
0
Wireless Ad Hoc and TEQL
I''m trying to follow Chapter 10 of the howto and apply it to two
ubuntu machines each with two 802.11b/g interfaces. However, I cannot
get a connection.
I would like the 4 interfaces to create 2 ad hoc links on separate
channels. I have set this up successfully with the following:
/etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop
wlanconfig ath0 destroy
wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0
2003 Jan 24
0
problem with iproute and TEQL over predefinited tables
hi, I''ve encrountred some problem with iproute2...
I''m building a router with kernel 2.4.20 but my script fail when I try to do
a load balancing over a specific traffic, how explained on LARTC for
balance the access between more link we should simple:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via IP1 dev ETH0 weight 1 \
nexthop via IP2 dev ETH1 weight 1
for specific traffic
2013 Nov 19
0
[SOLVED] ibm x440 xen not boot (rootfs not found)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
All.
Just in then case if anyone is using some old piece of hardware like the
ibm x440, I could successfully run xen 4.2.3 on it.
I have a working kernel .config and a set of xen boot parameters, along
with some tuneups in the x440''s BIOS. The problem was quite complex (irq
handling pci bus problems, ethtool magics, etc). Occasionally (once
2002 Oct 31
4
Egress shaping over multiple interfaces?
Hello,
After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over
ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because
our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device.
We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that
works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and