similar to: htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!

FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using

>>eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I''ve done that >>because I couldn''t work out any other way to use the static IP address >>that out ISP have given us. >> > >Aha, this is a config question. You can just add as many ip addresses to each physical card as you like. I forget the exact syntax, but check man pages for

>>Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address >>and I was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router >>and set up the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and >>routing. I figured I''d have to set up alises for other IP addresses >>eg ifconfig eth0:0 >>xx.xx.xx.193 but once I''ve done that

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

I''m sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov''s routing patch, but I can''t seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

>> No I am using the EN5861, just that we have two ADSL lines and only >> one >> EN5861 and rather than buying another I''d like to use linux to do the >> same job as the en5861, if you know what I mean. > >You can, but since you have two ADSL lines, you''ll need two ADSL devices of some kind, whether it''s a pair of 5861s, or a 5861 and an

Working at setting up some new firewalls with multi-path routing over 2 isps. Doing it with debian sarge. Problem is the normal network scripts use ifconfig and route. In my tests I did a simple setup script. Feel like I am reinventing the wheel :-) Is it OK to use the network scripts to setup the interface and then remove the routes ifconfig created and add any needed routes with ip

hi, question. i was reading the howto, and the part about load balancing talk about to providers, well i have one provider and make to dial-modem conection, so i have the same gateway in both (ppp0 and ppp1) but to diferent IP. what do i have to do? just set up the default route to be a multipath route? or do i need to split the access? _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box with 5 N/W cards of which one is 10/100/1000T and the others are 10/100T. I connected all the cards and turned on the machine. I wanted to force eth0 to be the 1000T cards but the cards get allotted eth0 to eth4 randomly. Is there some way wherein I can force my 1000T card to be eth0. Also I want to turn off auto negotation & flow control on the 1000T

I''m running 2.6.7 + (julian''s multi-path patch) + IMQ (imq2+beta6) and I got the following on my console while doing some stress testing: KERNEL: assertion (tp->retrans_out == 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1827) I don''t know what I would do to try to reproduce this condition; it only appeared once. tcp_input.c sounds deep enough to scare me off from looking

At the list archive page (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/) there is an amazing message from the future: the year 2032 (q1). Not that I know anything about mailman, but someone might want to "maintain" that. -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

Hey all, I had asked a question a little while ago about CPU usage being outrageous while using tc and a cbq qdisc. Ed was very kind and offered a few suggestions. One of these was to look at hashing. So after pounding away at it for about a week, I have a general understanding of how it works and have tried to implement it. Unfortunately, and quite obviously since I''m posting here, it

I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in /var/log/messages: Feb 9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn''t work conserving ?! The class it''s referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can anyone tell me why HTB would complain in this way? If I understand correctly, HTB isn''t a work-conserving qdisc anyway.

I''m a new comer. I have problems using tc+htb. I run the following commands, and expect outgoing ssh flow goes into 1:11. But actually it goes into default 12. What''s wrong? tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 2000kbit prio 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbit ceil

> Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:44:26 -0700 > From: Nicholas Erkert <nick@erkert.com> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread > > Glen Mabey wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:07:57PM -0400, Jos? Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: >>> >> >>>>>you can use an Athlon

Dear Gurus, We're having bizarre problems/behaviour. Admittedly we have an unusual set-up: - users on linux desktops (RedHat/KDE) mounting files over SMB using samba-2.2.5-10 -client and -common rpms. - files are on a SAN, clustered behind 2 netware servers (6.5), wihch run the cifs.nlm (netware guy has gone home - can't tell you the version just now) Files are spontaneously

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

Can someone verify that using fw as a filter in iproute2-2.6.11-050330 is broken. Doesn''t seem to work in any case and I saw an earlier post that would lead me to believe this is the case. If so does anyone have a temporary fix? Thanks, Troy

Dear all I have a dataset that looks like: fr.wt site 1 4400 glen 2 235 glen 3 225 glen ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 82 550 glen 83 550 kom 84 550 kom ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 191 820 kom 192 2000 soet ' ' ' ' ' ' I need to do a series of histograms for each of the codes, levels or factors in